Dialogues With A Christ - The Wisdom of Divine Anarchy

If you are ready to invite
and assist in ushering in a New
Consciousness on this Planet, then
welcome to our Spiritual Dialogue
Board

 



Lawsuit Threat by Chicken Rescuer

Subject: RE: [internetcds.com #193685] A very serious problem...

To: arkent3@earthlink.com

NOTE:  I received this, this morning.  I have done all I am going to do regarding this matter and have posted all comments made by everyone on my site and sent a copy of this to my ISP. Should my ISP take any action regarding this "SETUP," they will have to remove me from their service and justify doing so in a court of law.

If the People neither care nor see what is going on, I have been wasting my time on the Internet and this society has chosen the voice they want to hear.

I have been libeled and do not intend to take this lightly.  Note  kathy lynn deans comments and insinuations: "
I just hope he's not physically dangerous and is only verbally abusive. That's all I need!" "I truly believe he is mentally ill,"  " PS...If he kills me, it's all your fault!"

See my comments to my ISP at the bottom of this post.

                                Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
                              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Oh, I can't thank you enough.   I owe you all a box of See's Candy!   It just got to be too much for me.   We are going through a false arrest ordeal with the Sheriff Dept; they are accusing my husband of stealing a free-range chicken.   The stress of that alone is enough without people sending me
these messages Ray keeps posting.   I don't have time to go looking for them, but he takes ANYTHING I say and does something to it.   I don't understand why, either.   We are both fighting to stop corruption in JoCo, but just in different ways.


I have never once said anything cruel about him, and in fact stand up for him.   I truly believe he is mentally ill, and I tried talking to his daughter that lives in Reno, but she ended up with the same attitude as Ray. He just needs help, but only his family, or he himself can seek it.


Unless you are a photographer, hardly anyone goes to the expense of using DigiMarc.   But even if I didn't have it, what Ray is doing is still illegal.   Believe it or not, it falls under the "Stalking Laws" that have recently been revised to cover Internet stalking.   I could have forced him to remove that trash either way, but this way is far less harmful to him. With seven felonies, he didn't need another one.  

I just hope he's not physically dangerous and is only verbally abusive. That's all I need!

Again, thank you so much.   I haven't removed any of his notes from our Yahoo Board, but there are three owners!   Maybe someone else did.   I haven't even had time to visit the board in ages.   I think I answered one members question from MS Outlook in the past week.   Almost 100% of my time is going into the damned Chicken Caper.   I'll send you an update I just put out.   You can see the documents and what they did to my husband on my website, www.kathylynndean.com

Bless you all; this was an early Christmas present!   K.  PS...If he kills me, it's all your fault!

               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Subject: RE: [internetcds.com #193685] A very serious problem...

To: arkent3@earthlink.com

I just got around to reading that crazy note Ray sent me, and he does not seem to understand that this does not have anything to do with a June 7 date, or whenever I happened to post that note he tore apart.   He has to remove all of my e-mails from his site.   He's still playing games, and trying to get around it somehow.   It's illegal if he leaves anything of mine on his site, because I could have him arrested for stalking.   He has literally spread my name to thousands of sites due to this childish nonsense of his.   We need to find a hobby for this man!   It's like he's possessed or something.   It's actually quite unnerving, and he is so rude.   He doesn't even seem to care what he says to people, and even seems proud of his rudeness.

Archiving messages and talking of jail and litigation.   He should be thankful all he has to do is remove them.   He's planning on sticking some sort of note in where my initials and message used to be?   Good Lord, where does he get the time?   He had better not mess around with me on this, or try to cause more problems than he already has.   Again, thanks so much...K.


-----Original Message-----
From: World Wide Web Owner [mailto:www@bb.internetcds.com] On Behalf Of Justin Dack via RT
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 5:13 PM
To: kathylynndean@direcway.com; arkent3@earthlink.com
Subject: [internetcds.com #193685] A very serious problem...

I explained to Ray that he has to remove any of her words, any direct quotes, because she's copyrighted her postings and emails so they cant be reproduced without prior consent.
 
he wanted to know why she could "say things about him and quote him in postings or on a website" but he couldnt.

i let him know that if he had noted his emails or postings to be copyrighted as she had, he could then file a complaint against her site or the bulletin board host, same as she did.

explained that while her postings can be viewed publicly, they can't be reproduced without permission, and that this comes as a surprise to him because most people, 99% or something, dont bother copyrighting their postings or e-mails.

it was made clear that i couldnt provide an exact list because showing him our dialogue with her would be an unnecessary involvement on our part,  but that he had to remove all references to exact quotes by her.

i also warned against changing her statements to his own words and saying she said them, as it would likely land another complaint.
 
he wanted to know if it was legal to post his comments, then put a note that hers had been removed due to copyright law following his comments,  which it is as far as i know.

He made it clear that he understood and would remove everything.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Lawsuit Threat by Chicken Rescuer

Jaye, & Justin,

  This is for your information.  On June 7th, I responded to kathy lynn dean's comments smearing my reputation  to another person on her bulletin board, a board from which I was banned by her.  This was the first mention made of copyright.  It read: 

"kld: >> Since I am a photographer, I have used a company called DigiMarc for quite some time.   What this does is embed a watermark and copyright status into all my work.   I can chose to have the watermark show, or not.  I can choose if I want it for the web, printing or screen viewing.   Then, after the photograph, letter, e-mail, anything that HTML format to it is embedded with my watermark, I can trace it through a system called DigiMarc MarcSpyder.   What it does is it scans the Internet with its crawler, and searches for "plagiarized" copies.
 
kld: >.  Just for the heck of it, I copyrighted the above links.   I set the watermark to about medium so you can kind of see it in the background.

rk: "Just for the heck of it . . . so you can kind of see it" well isn't that SPESHUL!!!

rk:  Have you ever thought about not being so damned surreptitious about your actions and boldly post the copyright (not that it would have any legal effect in the routine fair use interactions of public bulletin board subscribers)?  Oh, I forget, you wouldn't be able to carry on this charade of "poor me" "poor me" for very long, would you?  We would all get to see what and who is hiding behind the mask of "poor me, poor me."

kld: >>  I did the same with several of the e-mails that Ray illegally posted elsewhere.

rk:  I copied and pasted articles off the bulletin board.  Remember, you banned me from posting my comments on the board, then for a week now (and still ongoing), you have been smearing my reputation without giving me an opportunity for rebuttal.  Is that your idea of "ILLEGAL," kathy lynn dean?

kld: >>  So what Ray did was not only illegal via standard Internet rules, he also broke the law by cross posting information of mine that was watermarked and legally copyrighted.

rk: I have already demanded a full investigation into the government/media mind contro/disinformation campaign to which you have given a platform.  Someone's going to go to jail over this one. Any bets on who?

kld:   The above links have copyright data of:
http://www.digimarc.com/cgi-bin/ci.pl%3F4+372344+0+2004+5   but you should be able to either right or left click on it and the copyright info should show up.

rk:  Nothing obvious about its presence, is there, kathy lynn dean?  Do you see how you indict your own integrity and rationality with such surreptitious tactics?  Hell, isn't it?

kld: >>  Everything links back to my website just because I have it set that way."

Jaye & Justin, I have posted the following notice on all articles subsequent to June 7th, 2004 and have indeed deleted all of kathy lynn dean's comments as per your instructions.  However, I have left comments prior to june 7, 2004 regarding the public notice of copyright dean made on her public bulletin board.  Apparently, dean feels she can destroy evidence through such defacto announcements of copyright.  NOWHERE CAN ANY COPYRIGHT NOTICE BE LEGIBLY FOUND ON THE BULLETIN BOARD AT http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JOCO_SheriffsWatch/

rk:  How can selective enforcement of such defacto copyright announcement stand when all others who write and participate in the JOCO SheriffsWatch bulletin board are not equally affected by it?  It smacks of discrimination!!

Please get back to me on this before your 48 hour deadline, as I do not desire to cause any undue problems for InternetCDS, but I do intend to defend myself and expect you folks to act responsibly in this matter and not hang a subscriber out to dry because it is expedient.  I suggest you turn this over to your lawyers and get a decision from them.

              Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

The following was publicly posted on my website and attached to all articles subsequent to June 7th wherein kathy lynn dean's comments were deleted.  rk

               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTE THE FOLLOWING WAS RECEIVED FROM MY ISP Dated: Jul 7, 2004 3:42 PM

Jaye Mathisen InternetCDS wrote:

Ray,

jm: >  We have received a DMCA violation notice from a Kathy Dean, stating that you are taking copyrighted material posted by her, mangling or otherwise changing it, and then posting it on  your own website w/o her permission.

jm: >  The DMCA requires ISP's to act immediately upon receipt of a DMCA violation, so we  are giving you 48 hours to get the offending material removed, or we will remove it for you, and charge accordingly.

jm: >  If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a line.

rk:  Ms. Dean has removed all evidence of comments made by me and posted by her after banning me from participation on the Josephine County SheriffsWatch bulletin board.   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JOCO_SheriffsWatch/

rk:  Since no evidence or notice of surreptitious copyrighting was given to all participants of the JOCO SheriffsWatch Bulletin Board by Ms. Dean prior to the article "Raymond Karczewski Addresses BINKY, WONKY, and Sheriff Dave Daniel, Too!!" posted on June 7, 2004" all articles predating such notice remain AS IS.
 
rk:  I have personally archived all posts between Ms Dean and myself in the event of future litigation launched by her.

rk:  I am leaving the articles subsequent to the June 7th, notice on my web site but am removing "her" comments as per instructions by my ISP.

rk:  Perhaps the true story can still be told.

rk:  By the way, my comments are not copyrighted and may be used as seen fit by others.  Our Freedom of Speech is under attack!!!

Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

     



Lawsuit Threat by Chicken Rescuer

To: Raymond Karczewski <arkent3@earthlink.net>

Cc: webmaster@internetcds.com

Date: 8 Jul 2004 20:28:17 -0000
 
"Jaye Mathisen via RT" <webmaster@bb.internetcds.com> wrote:

Raymond Karczewski (arkent3@earthlink.net) wrote:

jm:  > Nobody has to "claim" copyright.  it is implicit whenever a document is produced.  There are things such as compilation copyrights (like on collected works or such, but they only apply tothe collection as a whole, not the individual copyrighted items.)

jm:  > IN order to "prove" it, some people file a copy of the document and dates with the copyright office, but it is not required as long as they have some way of documenting it.

rk:  Then I suggest that as a responsible manager of my ISP you demand such proof/documentation from kathy lynn dean before you take action on her bogus claims and libelous insinuations (this has already been documented for you in an earlier communication).  This requires integrity on your part, not mere mechanical action.

jm:  > So in a nutshell, you need to remove all of it that quotes KLD's material directly, regardless of the date.

rk:  Since 1996, when we became subscribers with InternetCDS Anita and I have spent thousands of dollars for the service. Aside from dialup/hookup, we have received little in the way of service in return for it. Throughout those years, in the operation of our domain, I have called upon InternetCDS support staff to deal with the multiple problems attendant to these Internet attacks: Mail bomb campaigns, hacking, etc.  Each time I called upon your staff for technical guidance on computer matters unfamiliar to me, I was told by your staff you could do nothing, stating that it was my problem to solve. 

rk:  Well I have taken action to solve this problem. And now you sit by and once again tell me there is nothing you can do for the thousands of dollars we have paid your company for service over the last eight years. 

rk:  I have no intention of going beyond the present actions that I have taken -- those of which I have already advised you.

rk:  I expect InternetCDS to show some responsibility for arbitrarily taking action without a scintilla of evidence, but for the word of kathy lynn dean.  The evidence to substantiate  my firm and inarguable position is easily found on my website http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialchst.htm  Do a find, and as you have said yourself in this communication, "Knock yourself out!!" 

rk:  By the way, jaye, I am witholding payment for service until you folks have made a good faith effort to understand who is doing what to whom!!  I expect no less than that from a responsible ISP in carrying out their policies.  I will send you the check immediately when such good faith effort has been taken by your staff in the resolution of this matter.

rk:  Jaye, you are aware of the ordeal we have gone through over the years, why not set a standard for other ISP's to follow in this insidious attack upon Free and responsible Speech on the Internet.

              Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

jm:  > As to the legal threats and stuff, knock yourself out.  The DMCA gives explicit instructions and protection to ISPs in the process of pursuing good-faith DMCA violation notices.  I have no reason not to believe that you have done what she claims.  And if you don't agree with her, or believe she's made a bad-faith claim, you're welcome to sue her and pursue it as you see fit.



     



SHUT DOWN OF SERVICE

To: Raymond Karczewski <arkent3@earthlink.net>
 

"Jaye Mathisen via RT" <webmaster@bb.internetcds.com> wrote:

You don't understand how the DMCA works, and it's not my responsibility to explain it to you.  If you need assistance understanding it, hire yourself a lawyer, and pay him to explain it to you.

In short, if somebody submits a DMCA violation notice, it's not an issue of us "judging" it on it's merits, we're required to notify the violator or take down the site.  We are not obligated, nor responsible for judging the veracity of the claim, if you don' tthink it's valid, then you'll have to take it up with Kathy.  But since we have no reason to think it isn't perfectly valid, we have to proceed as we are required.  And it's all the evidence we need, your opinion on the subject withstanding.  If you don't like the DMCA, get the law changed.  Until then, that's the way it is.

So you can write anything you want about the subject but it doesn't change *anything*.

Since our position and actions are not going to change, and you're not going to comply, we don't have any choice (And since your'e not going to pay, since you dont' think we're doing what you want).  Your site will be deactivated tomorrow morning when the webmaster arrives.

You will need to make alternate arrangements for hosting.

On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 05:33:08PM -0700, Raymond Karczewski wrote:  Lawsuit Threat by Chicken Rescuer
 
To: Raymond Karczewski <arkent3@earthlink.net>
 
Cc: webmaster@internetcds.com
 
Date: 8 Jul 2004 20:28:17 -0000
 
"Jaye Mathisen via RT" <webmaster@bb.internetcds.com> wrote:
 
Raymond Karczewski (arkent3@earthlink.net) wrote:
 
jm:  > Nobody has to "claim" copyright.  it is implicit whenever a document  is produced.  There are things such as compilation copyrights (like on  collected works or such, but they only apply tothe collection as a whole,  not the individual copyrighted items.)
 
jm:  > IN order to "prove" it, some people file a copy of the document and dates with the copyright office, but it is not required as long as they  have some way of documenting it.
 
rk:  Then I suggest that as a responsible manager of my ISP you demand such  proof/documentation from kathy lynn dean before you take action on her  bogus claims and libelous insinuations (this has already been documented  for you in an earlier communication).  This requires integrity on your  part, not mere mechanical action.
 
jm:  > So in a nutshell, you need to remove all of it that quotes KLD's  material directly, regardless of the date.
 
rk:  Since 1996, when we became subscribers with InternetCDS Anita and I  have spent thousands of dollars for the service. Aside from dialup/hookup,  we have received little in the way of service in return for it. Throughout  those years, in the operation of our domain, I have called upon InternetCDS  support staff to deal with the multiple problems attendant to these  Internet attacks: Mail bomb campaigns, hacking, etc.  Each time I called  upon your staff for technical guidance on computer matters unfamiliar to  me, I was told by your staff you could do nothing, stating that it was my  problem to solve.
 
rk:  Well I have taken action to solve this problem. And now you sit by and  once again tell me there is nothing you can do for the thousands of dollars  we have paid your company for service over the last eight years.
 
rk:  I have no intention of going beyond the present actions that I have  taken -- those of which I have already advised you.
 
rk:  I expect InternetCDS to show some responsibility for arbitrarily  taking action without a scintilla of evidence, but for the word of kathy  lynn dean.  The evidence to substantiate  my firm and inarguable position  is easily found on my website
http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialchst.htm  Do a find, and as you have said  yourself in this communication, "Knock yourself out!!"
 
rk:  By the way, jaye, I am witholding payment for service until you folks  have made a good faith effort to understand who is doing what to whom!!  I  expect no less than that from a responsible ISP in carrying out their  policies.  I will send you the check immediately when such good faith  effort has been taken by your staff in the resolution of this matter.
 
rk:  Jaye, you are aware of the ordeal we have gone through over the years,  why not set a standard for other ISP's to follow in this insidious attack  upon Free and responsible Speech on the Internet.
 
              Raymond Ronald Karczewski?
 
jm:  > As to the legal threats and stuff, knock yourself out.  The DMCA  gives explicit instructions and protection to ISPs in the process of  pursuing good-faith DMCA violation notices.  I have no reason not to  believe that you have done what she claims.  And if you don't agree with  her, or believe she's made a bad-faith claim, you're welcome to sue her and  pursue it as you see fit.


     



SHUT DOWN OF SERVICE (Was: Lawsuit Threat by Chicken Rescuer)

To: Raymond Karczewski <arkent3@earthlink.net>

Date: 9 Jul 2004 02:22:12 -0000 

"Jaye Mathisen via RT" <webmaster@bb.internetcds.com> wrote:

Raymond Karczewski (arkent3@earthlink.net) wrote:

jm:  >  You don't understand how the DMCA works, and it's not my responsibility to explain it to you.  If you need assistance understanding it, hire yourself a lawyer, and pay him to explain it to you.

rk:  Now, jaye, that's the kind of service I have been receiving from you folks for the $70.00 per month (until you shifted dialup to earthlink recently) you charge for hosting my domain.  At least you are consistent.

jm:  >  In short, if somebody submits a DMCA violation notice, it's not an issue of us "judging" it on it's merits, we're required to notify the violator or take down the site.  We are not obligated, nor responsible for judging the veracity of the claim, if you don' tthink it's valid, then you'll have to take it up with Kathy.  But since we have no reason to think it isn't perfectly valid, we have to proceed as we are required.  And it's all the evidence we need, your opinion on the subject withstanding.  If you don't like the DMCA, get the law changed.  Until then, that's the way it is.

rk:  You "are not obligated, nor responsible for judging the veracity of the claim," eh?  "But since we have no reason to think it isn't perfectly valid, we have to proceed as we are required." These are your direct words that I have quoted, jaye mathisen.  I have not altered your words one bit, have I?  Well this is the same thing I did with kathy lynn dean. Did I twist your words? Did I mangle them? Did I do anything but repeat them AS IS.  Would you call that an indication of a "scary," mentally ill individual, and that you were afraid of being killed by the person who repeated your words, AS IS?  Well, jaye, that is precisely what kathy lynn dean did as she participated in a conspiracy to libel campaign in smearing my reputation both on and off her bulletin board, long after she banned me from her site for doing what I just did to you. 

rk:  You see, jaye, she involved you in the conspiracy to destroy the evidence of her libel.  She removed all traces of her crime (yes conspiracy to libel is a crime) from her site, but still faced the problem of removing evidence from mine and other sites. That is where you came in.  With your own statements you confess to participation in the coverup or at least negligence in not conducting a reasonable preliminary investigation in order to validate her charges. You just took her word for it. Is that any way for a responsible businessman to operate?

rk: Until you do so, jaye, may I suggest you leave my domain alone.  You are involving yourself in a landmark case of Internet censorship and destruction of our First Amendment rights, along with our right to face and defend ourselves against the libels of accusers through such frivolous, kneejerk, prejudiced actions.

rk:  Is that what you really want to subject yourself and your company to?  By the way, jaye, you will also note that everything I write on my website is copyrighted also.  When I was banned from the JOCO SheriffWatch website and they were smearing my reputation long after I was gone, did not kathy lynn dean do exactly what she has accused another of?  Be that as it may, if this foolish decision of yours to remove my site goes forward, I guarantee you this interference with First Amendment rights to express and defend oneself on the Internet has just begun.

rk:  By the way, jaye, I am sending this to the Josephine County Sheriff's Office for investigation.  You and kathy lynn dean are about to understand the message contained in the adage, "Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive."

rk:  As usual, I will post this on the Internet newsgroups and forums and ask all who are concerned about this infringement upon fair use of dialogue on the Internet to call you at your business and give their opinion on this matter.

rk:  jaye mathisen may be contacted by anybody concerned about such heavy handed censorship of our Constitutional Rights and complicity in covering up crimes at 1-800-943-4639 or email him at mrcpu@internetcds.com

jm:  >  So you can write anything you want about the subject but it doesn't change *anything*.

rk:  We shall see about that!!

jm:  >  Since our position and actions are not going to change, and you're not going to comply, we don't have any choice (And since your'e not going to pay, since you dont' think we're doing what you want).  Your site will be deactivated tomorrow morning when the webmaster arrives.

jm:  >  You will need to make alternate arrangements for hosting.

rk:  We shall see about that!!
 
                Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 05:33:08PM -0700, Raymond Karczewski wrote:  Lawsuit Threat by Chicken Rescuer
 
To: Raymond Karczewski <arkent3@earthlink.net>
 
Cc: webmaster@internetcds.com
 
Date: 8 Jul 2004 20:28:17 -0000
 
"Jaye Mathisen via RT" <webmaster@bb.internetcds.com> wrote:
 
Raymond Karczewski (arkent3@earthlink.net) wrote:
 
jm:  > Nobody has to "claim" copyright.  it is implicit whenever a document  is produced.  There are things such as compilation copyrights (like on  collected works or such, but they only apply tothe collection as a whole,  not the individual copyrighted items.)
 
jm:  > IN order to "prove" it, some people file a copy of the document and dates with the copyright office, but it is not required as long as they  have some way of documenting it.
 
rk:  Then I suggest that as a responsible manager of my ISP you demand such  proof/documentation from kathy lynn dean before you take action on her  bogus claims and libelous insinuations (this has already been documented  for you in an earlier communication).  This requires integrity on your  part, not mere mechanical action.
 
jm:  > So in a nutshell, you need to remove all of it that quotes KLD's  material directly, regardless of the date.
 
rk:  Since 1996, when we became subscribers with InternetCDS Anita and I  have spent thousands of dollars for the service. Aside from dialup/hookup,  we have received little in the way of service in return for it. Throughout  those years, in the operation of our domain, I have called upon InternetCDS
support staff to deal with the multiple problems attendant to these  Internet attacks: Mail bomb campaigns, hacking, etc.  Each time I called  upon your staff for technical guidance on computer matters unfamiliar to  me, I was told by your staff you could do nothing, stating that it was my  problem to solve.
 
rk:  Well I have taken action to solve this problem. And now you sit by and  once again tell me there is nothing you can do for the thousands of dollars  we have paid your company for service over the last eight years.
 
rk:  I have no intention of going beyond the present actions that I have  taken -- those of which I have already advised you.
 
rk:  I expect InternetCDS to show some responsibility for arbitrarily  taking action without a scintilla of evidence, but for the word of kathy  lynn dean.  The evidence to substantiate  my firm and inarguable position  is easily found on my website  http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialchst.htm  Do a find, and as you have said  yourself in this communication, "Knock yourself out!!"
 
rk:  By the way, jaye, I am witholding payment for service until you folks  have made a good faith effort to understand who is doing what to whom!!  I  expect no less than that from a responsible ISP in carrying out their  policies.  I will send you the check immediately when such good faith  effort has been taken by your staff in the resolution of this matter.
 
rk:  Jaye, you are aware of the ordeal we have gone through over the years,  why not set a standard for other ISP's to follow in this insidious attack  upon Free and responsible Speech on the Internet.
 
              Raymond Ronald Karczewski?
 
jm:  > As to the legal threats and stuff, knock yourself out.  The DMCA  gives explicit instructions and protection to ISPs in the process of  pursuing good-faith DMCA violation notices.  I have no reason not to  believe that you have done what she claims.  And if you don't agree with  her, or believe she's made a bad-faith claim, you're welcome to sue her and  pursue it as you see fit.


     



Thanks Bobby!!

To: Bobby Waddell
Hays  North Carolina

From Raymond Karczewski (arkent3@earthlink.net)

July 10, 2004

Dear Bobby,

  Thank you for your support.  You're the first and so far, the only contributor to the legal fund. 

  If you've tried to reach my website lately, you will note that it has been taken down by my ISP.   CENSORSHIP AT ITS FINEST!!

  It was shut off because of a complaint made that I had posted verbatim evidence of conspiracy to libel, an attempt to smear and discredit my reputation.  This has been going on for years.  No government agency will launch an investigation into it from the FBI on down.  I ought to have my website up in a day or two by going to a different ISP.

  Bobby, I'm glad you're there.  Take my word for it, the average person either can't or won't face the fact that we are losing our country through the outrageous and treasonous actions of a corrupt judiciary operating at all levels of our government.

  As you may or may not know, Rick Stanley of Denver, CO, a high profile activist goes for sentencing in September after he was found guilty for filing court papers, a routine procedure used by all attorneys engaged in court actions.  His actions were not much different from mine, yet they are going to put him away to make an example of him to others, while they released me after two convictions and seven bogus felonies which carried with them a maximum of 35 years (combined) in prison.  Two hunger strikes amounting to a total of 55 days convinced them I was serious.

  The difference between the cases, I feel, is that I represented myself pro se while Rick hired attorneys, i.e., "officers of the court and members of the BAR Assoc.  I also changed my legal status from debtor to creditor via the Redemption Process.   They are walking on eggs around this issue of unauthorized use of the copyrighed name.  All legal correspondence by State lawyers is  addressed to "Mr. K" instead of my name, i.e., my  full legal name.  They're walking on eggs around this issue.  

  It is my perception that the key to the matter is and always has been jurisdiction by a legal fiction court which has jurisdiction only over other legal fictions such as the ALL CAPITAL letter name of the "JURISTIC PERSON" a legal, corporate entity, but does not have jurisdiction over "living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, natural men/women, unless they waive their unalienable rights and agree to act as a surety for the debtor/defendant. That little trick tied to the registration of Birth Certificates has made slaves (Human Resources) out of just about every man, woman, and child, who is kept ignorant of their right to regain their true legal status.

  It is amazing to what degree the court and DA violated my Rights in the prosecution of my two court trials.  However, unless they are challenged, the old truism still stands, "those who make the rules, need not follow their own rules and therefore usually wind up winning the game." We're going to put that one to the test with your kind-spirited assistance.

  If I cannot generate enough money to cover the legal expenses for moving forward in this matter, I will send your check back to you, again, with my thanks.

  Bobby read the following interchange between the CEO of my ISP and myself.  You'll get a feel as to how insane our legal system now is.  It appears that evidence of a crime can now be destroyed by the mere declaration that a verbatim confession can be copyrighted and therefore cannot be used without the prior consent of the criminal.  How's that for nonsense?

  If you're so inclined, pass this interchange around to your like-minded friends.  Maybe they will see that a precedent set in dealing with an insane justice system can return the controls of our country into the hands where it belongs --     WE THE PEOPLE.

                 Again, Bobby, my thanks to you,
                     Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

P.S.  Bobby, one more thing.  When I get my website back up, would you mind if I listed your name/generic North Carolina Address as a contributor? It might shake some people loose from their conceptual/theoretical mode of thinking and cause them to look at it as a realistic approach to fighting tyranny without subjecting themselves to direct involvement with corrupt courts.  Let me know via email at arkent3@earthlink.net

     



Copyright be damned:  THIS IS ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE IN ANY COURT OF LAW!!

This is but a small sample of the evidence that kathy lynn dean sought to suppress through getting my website shut down with bogus, uninvestigated complaints of copyright infringement.  jaye mathisen of InternetCDS arbitrarily shut down the site BELEIVING such bogus charges without so much as a preliminary investigation as to the veracity of the charges made.  Nor did Mathisen quote the statute authorizing such unprecedented CENSORSHIP.  Thus mathisen and InternetCDS and its support employees have sacrificed any immunity granted ISP's by statute and are culpable for damages their CENSORSHIP has done to my reputation.

Statements of various Death Threats and libelous statements reported by kathy lynn dean

Subject: RE: [internetcds.com #193685] A very serious problem...
To: arkent3@earthlink.com

to: Jaye Mathisen InternetCDS CEO

Oh, I can't thank you enough.   I owe you all a box of See's Candy!   It just got to be too much for me.   We are going through a false arrest ordeal with the Sheriff Dept; they are accusing my husband of stealing a free-range chicken.   The stress of that alone is enough without people sending me
these messages Ray keeps posting.   I don't have time to go looking for them, but he takes ANYTHING I say and does something to it.   I don't understand why, either.   We are both fighting to stop corruption in JoCo, but just in different ways.


I have never once said anything cruel about him, and in fact stand up for him.   I truly believe he is mentally ill, and I tried talking to his daughter that lives in Reno, but she ended up with the same attitude as Ray. He just needs help, but only his family, or he himself can seek it.


Unless you are a photographer, hardly anyone goes to the expense of using DigiMarc.   But even if I didn't have it, what Ray is doing is still illegal.   Believe it or not, it falls under the "Stalking Laws" that have recently been revised to cover Internet stalking.   I could have forced him to remove that trash either way, but this way is far less harmful to him. With seven felonies, he didn't need another one.  


I just hope he's not physically dangerous and is only verbally abusive. That's all I need!


Again, thank you so much.   I haven't removed any of his notes from our Yahoo Board, but there are three owners!   Maybe someone else did.   I haven't even had time to visit the board in ages.   I think I answered one members question from MS Outlook in the past week.   Almost 100% of my time is going into the damned Chicken Caper.   I'll send you an update I just put out.   You can see the documents and what they did to my husband on my website, www.kathylynndean.com


Bless you all; this was an early Christmas present!   K.  PS...If he kills me, it's all your fault!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Referring to Ray's Phone Call

Second, I received a rather frightening phone call from this man today, but I have caller ID so didn't pick up.   What he left on my answering machine is quite shocking.   Since JoCo has a "First Time Doesn't Count" threat law, there is nothing I can do about it.   By the way, we now have that rule on video tape.   Both Justema and Tripp explained it in detail to Nick at our front gate.
 
Thirdly, I'm beginning to get a little worried.   I not only have to watch my back for cops, I now have to watch it for this guy, too.   And, I assume for the people on his list.

rk:  Did you not characterize the phone call I made to you as a "SHOCKING, FRIGHTENING,THREATENING, PHONE CALL?  I invite the readership to listen to the actual tape recording of the message I left on your answering machine.  SHOCKING?  FRIGHTENING?  THREATENING?  Listen to the call again at http://www.arkenterprises.com/kathyd.html


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


KLD Claims Another Death Threat

  Message 706 of 706  |   Previous |  Next  [ Up Thread ]     Message Index    
  Msg #
From:  "Kathy L. Dean" <kathylynndean@d...>
Date:  Sat Jul 10, 2004  9:15 pm
Subject:  07-07-04 Short Chicken Chat...


I received a death threat today from a neighbor, and reported it to the State Police. I BEGGED them to please talk to me since I couldn't phone the Sheriff Department. After explaining the whole situation to four different people, at last an Officer Couch took my story. I won't go into all details, but a neighbor that lives close to us threatened to kill me over the phone. It was the first time I have ever talked to him, I have never met him, and I have only seen him from a distance (about 150 feet) several times. We don't know them, we have never associated with them, and I do not have any idea why he said it to me. Not a clue. I even feed all his peacocks and peahens that are all on my property daily.

BOTTOM LINE: It's legal in Oregon to tell a person you are going to kill them, just like Tripp said. Since I had phoned the neighbor to ask about the property he has for sale next to us, I instigated the conversation. I tried explaining to Officer Couch that people keep thinking it's our land for sale, since it adjoins our property, so I wanted to let him know. Makes no difference; it's legal to tell someone you are going to kill them. Period.

If you find this hard to believe, phone 541 776-6114 and ask for Officer Couch. Their office is in Central Point.

Since the property for sale that is next to us joins the property he lives on right behind it, I'm a sitting duck. Literally. The 12 acres of undeveloped property next to us is heavily treed, and every time I went out the back door this afternoon, I peeked out the sliding glass door first to check for movement, or the glint of the barrel of a rifle. And of course now everything over there is moving and in constant action, shadows bouncing off trees, a startled deer and her does, ravens crying out in spots they never were before and even all my ducks were lined up looking in that direction. Motion all over the place where I of course never noticed any before.

Well, that's more than you wanted to know about anything, I'm sure. Nighty night...K.


rk:  COMMENT:  Look to dean's fixation with death threats and harm.  SHE NEVER MET THE GUY (HER NEIGHBOR), SAW HIM AT 150 FEET AND CLAIMS THE GUY THREATENED HER LIFE.  

rk:  Listen to my actual recorded  phone call to her  which she characterizes as "SHOCKING, FRIGHTENING,THREATENING,"  

rk: Then ask yourself, WHAT'S WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE???

Raymond Ronald Karczewski©


     



JOSEPHINE COUNTY OREGON: A Land Where Crimes are Copyrighted!!

By Raymond Karczewski

You cannot copyright a crime.  Or can you? Apparently you can in Josephine County Oregon.

If you are wondering what has happened to "the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave," wonder no more.  It has sunk into the predictable and inevitable depravity and moral decay of a society ruled by lawyers and corrupt judges.

Many who have been to my (former) website, http://www.arkenterprises.com now find an empty space where it once stood amongst the countless other websites of the world wide web. Why?  Because my ISP (InternetCDS of Medford, Oregon) shut it down because of a claim of copyright infringement.

What was the copyright infringement?  I exposed the libelous words of another, and the perpetrator of libel and vicious, unfounded smears who claims that her words were copyrighted, even though no evidence of copyright was found in any of her bulletin board smears.

Without investigation, nor following my advice to turn the evidence of libel over to the company lawyers before any action was taken in coercing me to remove evidence "deemed" to be copyrighted by the libelous perpetrator, the CEO of InternetCDS preemptively acted by shutting down my website when I told him I was withholding my monthly payment until a reasonable prelimanary investigation could be made by InternetCDS into the matter.

Insane?  You bet!!  What are the ramifications of such insanity? 

Could all written and oral criminal confessions to a crime extracted by police in their subsequent investigation now be declared null and void because the suspect later claims it was copyrighted and therefore inadmissable in a court of Law?

Have our lawmakers gone NUTS?!!  Has our Judiciary joined them? Has America and citizens of Josephine County Oregon lost its collective mind?

Have you sat idly by, in fear and trepidation, intimidated, paralyzed from action because of such organized insanity?

If so, you share responsibility for the death of our Constitutional Republic, a purported government "Of the People, By the People, and For the People."

What are you going to do about it?!

I can't do it alone, though I have tried since 1997 to get the FBI to investigate the organized government/media mind control/disinformation campaign used against unwary computer-using citizens of this once great country.  All I get is a STONE WALL OF SILENCE. From the White House, Congress, State and local government and FBI.

Now I have taken it to the Sheriff of Josephine County Oregon, Dave H. Daniel, as his department bulletin board http://www.cyberhouse.org/public/phpbb2/index.php has been used as a platform for conspiracy to libel by these same government/media Disinformation operatives.  As a result, he is tapdancing like hell trying to "shuffle off to buffalo," his responsibilities to his Oath of Office and the people he has sworn to serve.

Public Officials are public servants.  They work for "the People".  "The People"do not exist to serve government.  The latter is the evidence of tyranny, plain and simple.

I'm pretty much fed up with an ignorant populace which continues to allow their freedoms to be stripped away by wordtwisting lawyers and judges, whose agenda of insanity has caused Americans to take leave of their senses and cause them to embrace slavery as the legacy they leave for their children and their children's children.

It may have not begun that way, but I assure you the end is inevitable when crimes are copyrightable.

Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

     



Rick Stanley, Take Heart!!

Rick,

  I heard you on Michael Corbin's "4 a Closer Look" show the other day.  You sounded down and disheartened.  I understand that feeling when you are surrounded by people who urge you on to expose the corrupt system which has enslaved the American People, but who suddenly disappear or dry up when it's time for them to take action.

  Have heart, my brother.  As long as there exists the Spirit of Truth withn the hearts of SOME men, our innermost stirrings for justice and to oust the SATANIC influence over this world shall not be in vain.

  Rick, my ISP, InternetCDS, has shut down my website and I can no longer receive your newsletter at my old address of arkent@arkenterprises.com    Would you forward your newsletter to my earthlink address of arkent3@earthlink.net

  Have faith, Rick.  You will not be alone when you face the pharisitcal charade of your sentencing.  The key to redeeming our country is to awaken our sleeping brothers and sisters to their hypnotic conditioning.  That awakening will allow  dutiful "munchkins" to be sovereign MEN/WOMEN once again.  You, I, and others have no choice but to serve Truth and accept all that comes with it.  Perhaps by such service to Truth, we shall awaken our sleeping brothers and sisters to get beyond the letter-of-the-word laws constructed and interpreted  by wordsmith lawyers/judges, and listen to the undeniable Spirit of Truth contained in the word -- the essence that can be heard by all men/women who have the eyes to see and ears to hear.
 

     



JOCO SHERIFFS WATCH BULLETIN BOARD -- HYPOCRISY AT ITS ZENITH!!

As of July 11, 2004:
"A slightly moderated discussion group that will be shining light on the Josephine County Sheriff's Office in an attempt to bring citizens and law enforcement into a dialogue that is not permitted by the SHERIFF "moderators" "discovering" the identities of the posters and banning them and deleting their posts at the County run website. In other words, establishing a fair playing field for discussion on issues that are important to the whole community."

rk:  That is what meets the eye of the newcomer to the Joco SheriffWatch bulletin board http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JOCO_SheriffsWatch/  purportedly owned and run by a Josephine County Public Official who chooses to remain anonymous. (My sources tells me it is a JOCO Commissioner.)

rk:  Isn't that Speshul!!!  Political Intrigue in JOSEPHINE COUNTY, OREGON --  WHODDA THUNK???

rk:  Reread the introduction paragraph and apply its content to how Raymond Ronald Karczewski has been treated by such policies.

rk: Can you say H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-S-Y??!!!


Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

     



SLAVERY AWAITS ALL AMERICAN DUMB-DUMBS--YOU'VE EARNED IT!!

Date: 2004-07-11 03:59:59 PST

DrPostman (Look@mysig.foremail) wrote:

On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 05:53:16 GMT, "Henry Weems Jr." <nul@127.0.0.1> wrote:

Raymond Karczewski (arkent3@earthlink.net) wrote:

Subject: Re: Raymond Karczewski and Censorship
 

hw: >>  I find it ironic that Raymond Karczewski is complaining about censorship. He has filed numerous complaints with my ISP to have my subscription terminated because I dared to criticize him.  How is it that he believes that he should be free to say what he will about anyone (calling folks names such as "ignoramus", "pipsqueak", and "yahoo" and attempting to link them to activities such as "transvestitism", "drug addiction", "government operations" etc.), yet when another dares to disagree with him, they are breaking the law (what law by the way)?  How is it that when he attacks another with spates of ad hominems it is "mirroring" but when someone sincerely questions his mental health it is "libel", "smear tactics", and "government sponsored disinformation?"

hw: >>He should have payed his fine, but he refused.  He should have honored the subpoena that mandated his appearance in court, but he refused.  He should have payed his web hosting company, but not only did he refuse, he sent them a rude letter.  How can this be anyone else's fault but his?

hw: >> Just a little food for thought.

pm: > Ray is seriously clue challenged.

rk:  let's face it, this yahoo who calls himself Henry Weems Jr is just another phony government/media disinformation cover name.  In the 8 years I have been on the Internet, I have NEVER CONTACTED ANYBODY'S ISP to complain about them -- NOT EVER!!!

rk:  Like the pack of jackals these cowardly anonymous disinformation yahoos are, I meet them head-on on groups and forums, singularly or collectively.  Being demolished by the "Mirror of Truth," they all eventually turn tail, run, gather in their retreat, lick their wounds only to come back under other aliases.  Hell, isn't it?

rk:  What puzzles me is what the hell is it going to take to break through the hypnotic spell which accounts for the low level of intelligence/awareness of the American Public? 

rk:  I am referring to those in their conditioned blindness who cannot see the obvious "in your face" tactics used by these anonymous cowards and sit by inertly like impotent "munchkins" unable to stand up like MEN and do something, anything to clean up this mess, this government/media mind control operation.  I can only surmise they have become intimate with the psychological chains that bind them, the links of slavery which each day weighs more heavily upon the dumbed-down American Psyche.

rk:  Do you want proof of what I have just said?:  I ran a check on the email address "weems" posts under, i.e., <nul@127.0.0.1>.  It showed that from Oct 2, 1998 to Jun 30, 2004 the poster at that address went under the name of Robert Burris
On Jun 30, 2004, miraculously, Burris became Henry Weems Jr.

rk:  God only knows how many other phony aliases BURRIS/WEEMS has posted under.

rk;  The simple fact is that none of what WEEMS claimed I did is true.  It is a complete fiction, made up from beginning to end.  You know what Hitler did with the "BIG LIE."  Well, your government is doing it to you today.

rk:  Since they cannot face a simple man of Truth, a "living Christ", the almighty government with all its resources (stolen from it's enslaved people) cannot allow Pandora's box to be opened, SO THEY ARE LEFT WITH THE ONLY TACTIC AVAILABLE TO THEM -- ERECTING A STONE WALL OF SILENCE!!!

rk:  I needn't expand on that, the Google archives are loaded with articles of my demand that an FBI investigation be made into the ongoing government/media, sponsored/supported mind control/disinformation campaign thrust upon the computer using American Public.  See my petition to Congress at: http://www.petitiononline.com/RayNita1/petition.html
See how that petition has been trashed by these same disinformation specialists.

rk:  Well dummies, its happening to you!!! How do you think you've lost your freedoms, your country?!!  You do-nothing wimps deserve what you get coming down on you.  YOU'VE EAARRNED ITTTT!!

                                    Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
                                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
07/11/04 15:57:58 IP block 127.0.0.1
Trying 127.0.0.1 at ARIN
Trying 127.0.0 at ARIN

OrgName:    Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
OrgID:      IANA
Address:    4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
City:       Marina del Rey
StateProv:  CA
PostalCode: 90292-6695
Country:    US

Oct 2, 1998 by Robert Burris
Jun 30, 2004 by Henry Weems Jr


     



Another Phoney, Another Deception!! IS IT LUNCHTIME YET?!!!   

Jul 12, 04 - 1:44 PM

Marcus T. Shelby wrote:
(Note no responsible address given by disinformation agent "shelby")

Raymond Karczewski (arkent3@earthlink.net) wrote:

mts: >    Raymond is lying! I work on the abuse desk of a large ISP and he has contacted us many times, sending the same tired tirades of legal threats if we did not TOS subscribers who criticize him.

rk:  Now I suggest you prove your identity and the ISP you work(ed) for.  Then provide tangible evidence that such complaint(s) actually originated from my computer and were not one of the many forgeries in my name which have cluttered the internet newsgroups/forums, past and present.

rk:  You see, you shadow-slinking, cowardly disinformation agents traffic in deception.  You understand talk is cheap on the internet and you disinformation yahoos revel in such verbal deceptions plastering newsgroups and forums with such rubbish without offering a scintilla of proof. You count on the unawareness and gullibility of the average reader to pull off that shabby trick.

rk:  Now if you want to put your preemptive twist on the matter and play the game of demanding that I prove that I didn't make such complaints, to that I can only point out to the nonperceptive reader that one cannot prove a negative. 

rk:  Since I have never made such a complaint, no such proof exists. If you present such documents, then let it be fully examined as to its authenticity and not a mere forgery.

rk:  Now marcus t. shelby (or whatever the hell your real name is) prove your assertions.  Betcha can't and won't do it. 

rk:  I just called you on your deception. I have just called you a liar.  After all, "Res ispa Loquitor"  Your words speak for themselves.

rk:  You may now shamefully slink back into the shadows from whence you came and return sometime in the future with a new alias.  Don't you silly yahoos ever tire of being exposed?
I'm beginning to wonder if the general public is not tired of this 8-year-long failed attack upon my reputation/credibility?

rk:  In all that time, you pack of predatory jackals have not been able to produce actual evidence of a single contradiction in essence in anything that I have written on the Internet (discounting forgeries bent on manufacturing such deceptions). Even the dullest of consciousness ought to accept such 8 year failed attack as proof that a simple man of Truth, a Living Christ is who and what he says he is. 

mts: >  Raymond, NOBODY buys your bilgewater, and it was only a matter of statistics until you were caught lying by a person who works an abuse desk.

rk:  So break out the stats and the proof.

mts: > Stop being a hypocrite and accept that your moral and intellectual superiors will always call you on your lies and hypocrisy.

rk:  Again, mr. self-professed moral and intellectually superior government/media disinformation agent, have the backbone to back up your words by first laying a proper foundation to establish your credibility. 

rk: Prove your identity, your occupation, the government agency/media outlet, the ISP you claim to work for and repeat the same statements you have made in this post accompanied by a sworn affidavit.

rk:  If you should chance to be so foolish as to think you could get away with such a massive deception, go right ahead and I'LL EAT YOUR LUNCH!!

rk:  Go ahead "marcus t. shelby" --MAKE MY DAY!!!

Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

     




BEWARE of Patriot Judas Goats, It's not a Garden Path You're being Led Down.    

   By Raymond Karczewski

Apparently Truth is not welcome by those who proudly don the mask of Patriot, yet when they sense Truth to be too close for comfort, they panic and reveal their true colors.

Much talk abounds on these groups about the growing tyranny in our country, but little action comes of it. 

While patriots go on endlessly quibbling and arguing over the mote in their brother's eye, they obediently and blindly carry out the agenda of power which utilizes the strategy of "Divide and Conquer."

A simple man, a man of Truth, an outsider to the hidden-in-plain-sight agenda of quisling patriots enters the group in good faith.  His simplicity changes the comfortable quibbling and gossip which permeates the group discussion, exposing the hypocrisy of masked participants and thereby causing an angered flurry of reaction.  Threatened by the simple, inarguable Truth, an energy foreign to their ignorantly conditioned Intellect, TRUTH and its messenger becomes the enemy. Hypocrites, in their codependent illusion of petty politicking soon learn the lesson that THEY CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!

There's an old saying -- "All that glitters is not gold." That adage bears out when a closer examination is made of the so-called Patriot leadership which sponsors the numerous groups, forums, and bulletin boards on the Internet and on International  broadcast media.

How many of these patriot platforms are genuine, are real?  How many are merely platforms for dispensing Disinformation to a conditioned, addicted populace?  How many of the owners/operators of these boards are "JUDAS GOATS" whose purpose is to flush out  closet government dissenters?  How many exist for the express purpose of inveigling the unaware and the trusting into a Government Sting Operation?  How many are indeed manned and infiltrated by paid government provocateurs who, in the best light possible, are able to cloak themselves with the mantle of "Loyal Opposition?"

Here is a comment I made to the moderator of one such site in my first post to the group. "It is not my intention to redirect attention away from your case but to focus public attention upon the routine corruption that governs the Josephine County Courthouse."

I entered to group to help, not to hinder, but I also came to speak only TRUTH!!

The result of such open and unabated Truth was met with attack, libel, and endless assault upon my character, the character of my family members, my reputation and my mental competency.  All without without a scintilla of proof.  When actual words of libel and attack were mirrored, exposing the source of the libels, I was banned from the group, not allowed to rebut the continuing smears which persisted long after I left the group. 

When I posted on my website, the actual sound file comments and tape recording of a phone call I made to the moderator of the group, whatever credibility she may have had prior to her libelous characterizations WAS DESTROYED in an instant.  She was exposed in her deception. She had come face to face with the Truth. It left her with no place to go to save face.  

I posted her direct words (as any seasoned police investigator knows to do) to establish direct evidence of the commission of the crime of "Conspiracy to Libel." As a result, the moderator complained to my ISP that her words (evidence of libel and character assassination) were copyrighted and demanded that I remove all evidence pertaining to her self-damning statements from my website.  (keep in mind, I was already banned and yet the smears continued on her bulletin board almost on a daily basis.) 

I had the foresight to archive all articles of my interaction on that bulletin board.  The board was subsequently swept clean of the interactions, destroying existing evidence.  The moderator claimed she did not remove the evidence, that somebody else (she wouldn't say who) did. 

I was told by jaye mathisen, CEO of InternetCDS, my ISP, that I would have to remove all evidence of the moderator's statements from my website, or InternetCDS  would clear them away and charge me for it.  I demanded that InternetCDS at least conduct a preliminary investigation into the charges that the copyright of words (which may be offered into evidence as the fruit of a crime) is protected by copyright.  He refused to do any preliminary inquiry into the matter.  I told mathisen that I was witholding my monthly payment until a reasonable look into the charges were made.  He said that my site would be shut down the following day for noncompliance.

As you can see if you go to http://www.arkenterprises.com, I have been censored, shut down, and am in the process of seeking a new ISP. 

The lesson that I share with all is "WATCH OUT FOR THOSE JUDAS GOATS"!! It's not a garden path, you're being led down!!

Ah! AMERICA, formerly "the Land of the Free and Home of the Brave" -- I knew you when!!!

                  Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

 Here are some of the forums/groups/bulletin boards from which you will get banned if you dare to speak TRUTH!

# USENET newsgroups
# Google Archives http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search
# MSNBC Religion & Ethics Forum http://bbs.msnbc.com/bbs/msnbc-faith/index.asp
# MSNBC Political Forum http://bbs.msnbc.com/bbs/msnbc-politics/index.asp
# NEO-TECH Forums http://www.neo-tech.com/front/
# Medford Oregon Mail Tribune Newspaper Forum http://www.mailtribune.com/
# Oregonian Newspaper Town Square Forum; http://www.oregonlive.com/forums/townsquare/
# **Bendnet Electronic Community Forum http://www.bend.com/bendnet/index.php
# *** Friends of Liberty International Discussion Board (Patriot Movement) http://www.friendsofliberty.com
# The POWER HOUR http://www.gulfwarvets.com/cgi-bin/forumdisplay.cgi?action=topics&forum=The+Power+Hour&number=5
# progun1's Freedom Board, http://members3.boardhost.com/progun1/
# Klamath Basin Discussion Forum http://disc.server.com/Indices/153941.html
# Ken Hoek's Truth Talk Forum (Truth On The Web Ministries) http://pub31.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=2579584272
# Propaganda Press Forum http://pub32.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=2670682617
# PatriotVOCALS Freedom Sound Off!  http://pub2.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=87749165
# The Alex Jones National Patriot Show!
# Free Republic Forum Admin Moderator drstevej "http://www.freerepublic.com" censored my  first and only article posted on their forum  " . . . .And We Call Ourselves Sane?!!!" See  http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch89.html#Sane then stated "I predict you will be toast soon." and subsequently  pulled the article thread  from forum stating "Your posting privilege has been revoked."  So much for Free Speech in America, Eh?  rk
# ACopsView Web Forum, http://pub8.bravenet.com/forum/show.php?usernum=673603257&cp=American Patriot Friends Network, http://disc.server.com/Indices/149495.html (Read what the Administrator had to say:)
# The Floyd Report  http://www.floydreport.com/board.php You have been banned from this forum Please contact the webmaster or board administrator for more information
# Catholic Site  DeoOmnisGloria.com   (CATHOLIC SITE BANS CHRIST) http://www.deoomnisgloria.com/
# Josephine County Sheriff's Office Bulletin Board Interactive Web Site  http://www.cyberhouse.org/public/phpbb2/index.php You have been banned from this forum Please contact the webmaster or board administrator for more
information