After experiencing a False Arrest, False Imprisonment, 33-day Hunger Strike and continual, unabated abuse by a U.S. Constitution-avoiding Josephine County, Oregon Justice System/Government bent on trampling upon the Unalienable Rights of its Sovereign People, the following is the second such Request for Proof of Claim submitted to Josephine County District Attorney Clay Johnson.

It must be noted that DA Johnson is currently "in dishonor" by not responding to or providing the necessary proofs of claim called for on November 8, 2002.  DA Johnson followed up his prior nonresponse by referring the matter to the Oregon Department of Justice for investigation of this private man for the crime of "simulation of a legal process" (Paper Terrorism).

Read carefully the content deeply inherent within the stated Proofs of Claim 1 through 23 and keep watching for the answers/nonanswers to come.  Therein shall lie the answer as to whether we as Americans now live in a free, Constitutional Republic or are enslaved within a New World Order Big Brother Police State.

The Line in the Sand has been drawn.  Let us see if Justice or Tyranny prevails.

                    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
U.S.P.O Registered Mail Article No RR463804155 US

DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLAY E. JOHNSON
STATE OF OREGON JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
FOR JOSEPHINE COUNTY
JOSEPHINE COUNTY COURTHOUSE
500 NW 6th Street
GRANTS PASS, OR  97526
 
January 20,  2003

Holding Government Accountable
 

Re: CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE -- REQUEST FOR PROOF OF
CLAIM Reference No: 02-CR-0617

MR. CLAY EDWARD JOHNSON,

This Revised Affidavit concerning conditional acceptance and request for proof of claim is to clarify any confusion which you may be experiencing regarding the previous CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE -- REQUEST FOR PROOF OF CLAIM served you on November 8, 2002 via your agent/receptionist "Sue", by my wife Anita Karczewski and witnessed by Mr. Peter Sparacino and Mr. John Taft.

It arises from a telephone contact received on December 10th, 2002 from Investigator GRIFF HOLLAND of the Oregon State Police assigned to the Oregon Attorney General's office.  Although I did not acknowledge the appellation of my copyrighted trademark/trade name, and refused to talk to HOLLAND on the phone or elsewhere, he persisted in the conversation, specifically stating that such "paperwork" was sent to him via the Oregon DOJ from the Josephine County District Attorney's office, as the Josephine County District Attorney's office claimed it didn't make any sense to them.  HOLLAND repeatedly asked whether this private man was familiar with the legal term "simulation of a legal process."

I draw your attention to Articles of the Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition which states:

                      ARTICLE I   BILL OF RIGHTS

Section 1. Natural rights inherent in people. We declare that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: that all power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their peace, safety, and happiness; and they have at all times a right to alter, reform, or abolish the government in such manner as they may think proper.

Section 9. Unreasonable searches or seizures. No law shall violate the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search, or seizure; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath, or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or thing to be seized.

Section 10. Administration of justice. No court shall be secret, but justice shall be administered, openly and without purchase, completely and without delay, and every man shall have remedy by due course of law for injury done him in his person, property, or reputation.–

Section 33. Enumeration of rights not exclusive. This enumeration of rights, and privileges shall not be construed to impair or  deny others retained by the people.–

ARTICLE VII (Original)   JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

Section 7. Oath of office of Judges of Supreme Court. Every judge of the supreme court, before entering upon the duties of his office, shall take and subscribe, and transmit to the secretary of state, the following oath:

"I, ____________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of Oregon, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge the duties of a judge of the supreme court of this state, according to the best of my ability, and that I will not accept any other office, except judicial offices, during the term for which I have been elected." [Created through initiative petition filed July 7, 1910, and adopted by the people Nov. 8, 1910]

Section 10. Supreme and circuit judges; election in classes. When the white population of the State shall amount to Two Hundred Thousand the Legislative Assembly, may provide for the election of Supreme, and Circuit Judges, in distinct classes, one of which classes shall consist of three Justices of the Supreme Court, who shall not perform Circuit duty, and the other class shall consist of the necessary number of Circuit Judges, who shall hold full terms without allotment, and who shall take the same oath as the Supreme Judges.

ARTICLE XV   MISCELLANEOUS  3. Oaths of office

Section 3. Oaths of office. Every person elected or appointed to any office under this Constitution, shall, before entering on the duties thereof, take an oath or affirmation to support the Constitution of the United States, and of this State, and also an oath of office.:B1ART

The Oregon Constitution clearly states that Members of the Judiciary and Sheriff's Deputies have sworn an oath to support the U.S. Constitution and the Oregon Constitution.  Article 1, Section 1. states "Natural rights inherent in people. We declare that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: that all power is inherent in the people, and all free  governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their peace, safety, and happiness;. . . "

For the sake of clarification, the previous "CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE -- REQUEST FOR PROOF OF CLAIM" served you on November 8, 2002 is hereby amended to read as follows:

I, the Secured Party, a living, breathing, flesh-and-blood,  private man want to resolve this matter. I find it necessary to exhaust  my administrative remedy as your presentment/offer has left me somewhat confused. I realize that my past experience is urging me to argue every point, but now realize that I want to accept for value your offer/charges and I promise to pay the fine and even go to jail in behalf of the debtor that you have brought the charges against, but I can only do so conditioned upon ‘proof of claim,' and as such, the necessary Proof(s) of Claim are enumerated below:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1.  PROOF OF CLAIM on how the Oregon Constitution operates upon me, Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person, the private man.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2.  PROOF OF CLAIM on how the State statutes by and through the Oregon Legislature and the DMV operate upon me, Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient,  natural person, the private man.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3.  PROOF OF CLAIM that the name appearing on the charging instrument, in capital letters; RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI, is not a corporate fiction, but is the name of the living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person, the private man in his private capacity.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4.  PROOF OF CLAIM that the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) describe any other class of license other than for commerce or for commercial trade, occupation or profession.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition  Article 1, Section 1
5.  PROOF OF CLAIM  that this private man is specifically named in the Oregon State Statutes and more specifically ORS cites as applied in this matter.  (See the PEOPLE v. HERKIMER, 15 Am Dec 379, 4 Cowen (N.Y. 345, 348 (1825)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition  Article 1, Section 1
6.   PROOF OF CLAIM that the STATE OF OREGON, in its Corporate capacity, has Jurisdiction over this living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person/private man, the Secured Party, Raymond Ronald Karczewski© in his private capacity unless consented to, and/or contracted for, by that natural person/private man.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition  Article 1, Section 1
7.  PROOF OF CLAIM that the COUNTY OF JOSEPHINE, in its Corporate capacity, has Jurisdiction over this living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person/private man, the Secured Party, Raymond Ronald Karczewski© in his private capacity unless consented to, and/or contracted for, by that natural person/private man.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Constitution of Oregon -- ARTICLE XV   MISCELLANEOUS  3. Oaths of office
8.   PROOF OF CLAIM that all "Officers of the Court," which include members of the JOSEPHINE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S staff, are under oath of office to support and defend both U.S.  and OREGON Constitutions.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Constitution of Oregon -- ARTICLE XV   MISCELLANEOUS  3. Oaths of office
9.   PROOF OF CLAIM that Deputies and/or Jail Staff, in their capacity as Agents for the CORPORATE JOSEPHINE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, are bound by their oath of office to support and defend, both U.S. and OREGON Constitutions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition  Article 1, Section 1
10.   PROOF OF CLAIM that the CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR  JOSEPHINE COUNTY, in its Corporate capacity, has Jurisdiction over this living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person/private man, the Secured Party, Raymond Ronald Karczewski© in his private capacity unless consented to, and/or contracted for, by that natural person/private man.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition  Article 1, Section 1
11.   PROOF OF CLAIM of the existence of the liability and how it was created.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition  Article 1, Section 1
12.   PROOF OF CLAIM of what 'state' the liability came from, the de jure state ('The State') or the de-facto state ('This State'), a mere corporation.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
13.   PROOF OF CLAIM that the State of Oregon DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DMV, through its Administrative Drivers Licensing process, has Jurisdiction over this living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person/private man, the Secured Party, Raymond Ronald Karczewski© in his private capacity unless consented to, and/or contracted for, by that natural person/private man.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
14.  PROOF OF CLAIM that in my private capacity, that I, Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person, the private man is subject to Class A, B, and C commercial driver license. (see ORS 807.031)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
15. PROOF OF CLAIM that the State of Oregon via the DMV sells any other ‘driver' license.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
16.  PROOF OF CLAIM that the Motor Vehicle code does not operate upon all ‘drivers' of ‘all' vehicles owned or operated by ‘the United States,' ‘this state,' ‘or any county,' ‘city,'  ‘district,' ‘or any other political subdivision of this state' … and thus operates upon this private man. (see ORS 801.020)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
17.  PROOF OF CLAIM that my ‘private vehicle is not a ‘recreational' vehicle that is operated solely for personal (private) use. (see ORS 801.208)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
18.  PROOF OF CLAIM that my ‘private vehicle is used for the transportation of persons for compensation or profit, or designed or used primarily for the transportation of property (for hire). (see ORS 801.210)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
19. PROOF OF CLAIM that Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person, the private man was a licensee at the time of the ‘stop' to subject himself to the motor vehicle code by agreement and as a signatory. (see Vehicle Traffic Law, 1974 Rev Ed., page 238, 239)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
20. PROOF OF CLAIM that, "In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervision officials "may" exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis means that they "must" exempt them, generally applies in this matter (State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 60 C.J.S. section 94 pg 581)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
21. PROOF OF CLAIM that Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person, the private man does not have the right in light of ORS 801.305.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
22. PROOF OF CLAIM that the ‘entity' bringing forth this claim can testify on the witness- stand of the same and bring all relevant evidence.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
23. PROOF OF CLAIM that the prosecutor, as an agent of the State, has established a ‘liability bond' in this action to indemnify Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person, the private man in the event of any damnification.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  Please understand that I want to resolve this matter as soon as possible and see the need to exhaust my administrative  remedy/process, I now request the above ‘proofs of claim' that you rely upon to support your claim in this matter.

MR. JOHNSON, in your capacity as DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF JOSEPHINE, OREGON, having superior knowledge of the law and access to the 'proof,' you can provide such proof to the points raised herein and therefore establish validity of proof of claim.  Until then no controversy exists requiring adjudication by the court.

This Secured Party/Creditor must ask, "What is my remedy?"

 Per your failure or refusal to bring forth ‘proof of claim,' you will be found in dishonor and will have admitted a damage and injury to Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person,  this private man and will have stipulated to the facts that this private man herein is not subject to the Oregon Vehicle Code and that he has a right to travel in his private vehicle/conveyance in non-commercial use of same and as to any monetary fine, that the private man can only discharge the monetary penalty in behalf of the person/debtor named on the charging instrument.  Presumption is taken that you are giving permission for a lien to be filed against you, in the amount of Five Hundred Thousand United States Dollars ($500.000.00) for said admission, confession, dishonor by your silence and dishonor.  Said silence constitutes agreement.

The Secured Party/Creditor, Raymond Ronald Karczewski© respectfully asks that you reply to this matter within 10 days.  A non-response and/or failure to provide proof of claim will constitute agreement that charges brought against this living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person/private man, Secured Party, Raymond Ronald Karczewski© are unfounded in common law and the State of Oregon by and through Josephine County has no jurisdiction over the private man, has no claim and therefore no controversy exists.
 
This  CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE -- REQUEST FOR PROOF OF CLAIM is dated: the Nineteenth Day of the First Month in the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Three.

  Sincerely
  Without Prejudice
 
Signed:      Raymond Ronald Karczewski©

Autograph Common Law Copyright ª 2002   All rights reserved.  NO part of this Autograph Common Law Copyright may be used, nor may said copyrighted property be reproduced in any manner, without prior, express, written  consent and acknowledgment of Raymond Ronald Karczewski© as signified by Raymond Ronald Karczewski©'s signature in red ink.  Unauthorized use of "Raymond Ronald Karczewski" incurs same unauthorized-use fees as those associated with RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI©.

*************************************************************
Let man not Fall for a New World Order.
Let mankind Rise to a New World Consciousness!
Raymond Karczewski http://www.arkenterprises.com
**************************************************************