Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
In Care of: PO Box 1870
Cave Junction, 97523
Oregon
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR JOSEPHINE COUNTY
STATE OF OREGON
)
Plaintiff
)
NOTICE OF DEMAND FOR
vs.
)
DISCOVERY
)
RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI© )
Defendant
)
)
CASE NO 02-CR-0617
___________________________________)
Comes Now, Raymond Ronald Karczewski© an American Natural Born
citizen, Secured Party
and Creditor to the Debtor RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI©, Defendant named in
Criminal Case No: 02-CR-0617, who is a sovereign common man arising under the original
jurisdiction of the de jure Constitution of the United States of 1789 as amended by the qualified
electors of the several States of this American Union and the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 for the
territories of the de jure United States. And further, Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, gives or
grants no jurisdiction or venue to this unlawful court.
I, Raymond Ronald Karczewski© hereafter referred to as "Secured Party," protest, object and take
exception to these proceedings, to the unlawful, illegal and usurpers of public office known as
judges, magistrates, police, and clerks appearing to do justice. Secured Party also gives notice of a
special appearance, even though this is not a constitutional or legislatively created court. that
Secured Party is in fear for his life, liberty, and property from reprisals of Josephine County
Deputy Sheriffs and State Troopers of the Oregon State Police who seek to label Secured Party as
a "Paper Terrorist"
REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY
Secured Party, in order to expedite disposition of this case, and adequately prepare for motions,
demands and trial, as the case may be, requests the prosecutor and its agents, assigns or nominees
provide the following discovery at your earliest convenience. Please consider this a formal request
for discovery of the following:
1. Notice of prosecution's intention to use in case-in-chief at trial any evidence, which the
Secured Party maybe entitled to discover.
2. The Secured Party’s written or recorded statements;
3.Photographs, books, papers, documents and objects, etc., which are material to the preparation
of the defense;
4.Photographs, books, papers, documents, objects, etc., which prosecution intends to use in
their case-in-chief;
5 .Any evidence that the Secured Party was the subject or eavesdropping, wiretapping or any
other interception of communication, i.e., patrol car video or audio
tapes.
6. All evidence of sworn affidavits regarding the
establishment of Secured Party's liability to
the Oregon Statutes.
7. All evidence on how the Oregon Constitution operates
upon the Secured Party, Raymond
Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person, the private
man.
8. All evidence on how the State statutes by and through the Oregon Legislature and the DMV
operate upon the Secured Party, Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-
blood, sentient, natural person, the private man.
9. All evidence on how the name appearing
on the charging instrument, in capital letters;
RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI, is not a corporate fiction, but is the name of the living,
breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person, the private man conducting life in his private
capacity.
10. All evidence on how the Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) describe any other class of license
other than for commerce or for commercial trade, occupation or profession.
11. All evidence on how the STATE OF OREGON, in its Corporate capacity, has Jurisdiction
over the Secured Party, this living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person/private
man, Raymond Ronald Karczewski© in his private capacity unless consented to, and/or
contracted for, by that natural person/private man.
12. All evidence on how the COUNTY OF JOSEPHINE, in its Corporate capacity, has
Jurisdiction over this living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person/private man, the
Secured Party, Raymond Ronald Karczewski© in his private capacity unless consented to, and/or
contracted for, by that natural person/private man.
13. All evidence that "Officers of the Court," which include members of the JOSEPHINE
COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S staff, are under oath of office to support and defend both
U.S. and OREGON Constitutions.
14. All evidence that the Josephine County Sheriff, Deputies and/or Jail Staff, in their capacity
as Agents for the CORPORATE JOSEPHINE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, are
bound by their oath of office to support and defend, both U.S. and
OREGON Constitutions
15. All evidence that the CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR
JOSEPHINE COUNTY, in its Corporate capacity, has Jurisdiction over this living, breathing,
flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person/private man, the Secured Party, Raymond Ronald
Karczewski© in his private capacity unless consented to, and/or contracted for, by that natural
person/private man.
16. All evidence of the existence of the Secured
Party's liability and how it was created.
17 All evidence of which "state' the liability came from, the de jure state ('The State') or the de-
facto state ('This State'), a mere corporation.
18 All evidence that the State of Oregon DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DMV,
through its Administrative Drivers Licensing process, has Jurisdiction over the Secured Party, this
living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person/private man, the Secured Party,
Raymond Ronald Karczewski© in his private capacity unless consented to, and/or contracted for,
by that natural person/private man.
19. All evidence that the Secured Party Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing,
flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person, the private man is subject to Class A, B, and C
commercial driver license. (see ORS 807.031)
20. All evidence that the State of Oregon via the DMV sells any
other ‘driver’ license.
21. All evidence that the Oregon Motor Vehicle code does not operate upon all ‘drivers’ of ‘all’
vehicles owned or operated by ‘the United States,’ ‘this state,’ ‘or any county,’ ‘city,’ ‘district,’
‘or any other political subdivision of this state’ … and thus operates upon this private man. (see
ORS 801.020)
22. All evidence that Secured Party's ‘private vehicle is not a ‘recreational’ vehicle that is
operated solely for personal (private) use. (see ORS 801.208)
23. All evidence that Secured Party's ‘private automobile
is used for the transportation of
persons for compensation or profit, or designed or used primarily for the transportation of
property (for hire). (see ORS 801.210)
24. All evidence that Secured Party, Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-
and-blood, sentient, natural person, the private man was a licensee at the time of the ‘stop’ to
subject himself to the motor vehicle code by agreement and as a signatory. (see Vehicle Traffic
Law, 1974 Rev Ed., page 238, 239)
25. All evidence that, “In view of this rule a statutory provision that the supervision officials
“may” exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a commercial basis means that they
“must” exempt them, generally applies in this matter (State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 60 C.J.S.
section 94 pg 581)
26 . All evidence that the Secured Party, Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing,
flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person, the private man does not have the right in light of ORS
801.305.
27. All evidence that the ‘entity’ bringing forth this claim can testify on the witness- stand of the
same and bring all relevant evidence.
28. All evidence that the prosecutor, as an agent of the
State, has established a ‘liability bond’ in
this action to indemnify Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood,
sentient, natural person, the private man in the event of any damnification.
29. All rough notes of all statements made by arresting
officer(s) regarding arrest/incarceration
of Secured Party.
30. Any evidence that any prospective witness has ever made
any false statement to the
authorities whether or not, under oath or under penalty of perjury, or that any witness does not
have a good reputation in the community for honesty.
31. Any evidence that any prospective witness has made a contradictory or inconsistent statement
with regard to this case, or any statement showing bias or a motive
to fabricate.
32. Any evidence that any prospective government witness is biased or prejudiced against the
Secured Party, or has a motive to falsify, distort or overcompensate
his testimony.
33. Any evidence that any prospective witness has ever engaged in any activity involving deceit,
fraud, or false statements whether or not the activity resulted in an arrest or conviction.
34. Any evidence, including any medical or psychiatric
report or evaluation, tending to show
that any prospective witness’ ability to perceive, remember, communicate, or tell the truth is
impaired: any evidence that a witness has ever used narcotics or other
controlled substance.
35. The name and last known address of each prospective
government witness.
36. Any evidence, including any statement by any person, tending to exculpate the Accused in
whole or in part.
37. All prior written, recorded, or oral statements of each prospective witness relating to this case
to whomever made.
38. All notes or any other writings or documents, used by the witness before the grand jury.
39. Agents or prosecutors’ notes of interviews with prospective government witnesses. See
Goldberg v. United States, 425 U.S. 94 (1976).
40. A transcript of the grand jury testimony of each prospective witness, and all remarks
addressed to the grand jury by the prosecutor.
41. All evidence or documents of the Court’s creation, rules of court, jurisdiction and venue that
the Prosecution is using in this instant action.
42. All evidence or documents of the rules of court that are temporary or special acts that will be
used in this instant action.
43 .All evidence or documents of the rules of court that are public that will be used in this
instant action.
44. All documents or evidence of the law(s) authorizing the impoundment of Secured Party's
private automobile, i.e. beige Cadillac, in this instant criminal action.
45.All documents or evidence of the law(s) authorizing the search of said beige Cadillac against
my objections in this instant criminal case.
46 .All documents, private property or evidence removed from said beige Cadillac
against the objections of Secured Party, Raymond Ronald Karczewski© in this instant criminal
case.
If you refuse to disclose any of the above items, or if you have doubts as to the propriety of
disclosure, your duty is to submit the questioned material to the court for its review. United States
v. Lehman, 756 F.2d 725, 729 (9th Cir. 1985) (prosecution must either disclose the material or
submit it to the court).
Finally, please consider this request to be continuing discovery of
the above-mentioned items and
Accused request sufficient time for written interrogatories, depositions and admissions.
Dated March 6, 2003.
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
_____________________________________
Secured Party/Creditor, American citizen
STATE OF OREGON
County of Josephine } ss.
BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this _______ day of ______________,
______,
Before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State of
Oregon, personally
appeared the within named ______________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
known to me to be the identical individual AS described
in and who executed the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that ___________ executed the same freely
and voluntarily.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set My
hand And affixed my official seal the day
and Year last
above Written.
_________________________________________
Notary Public of Oregon
My Commission expires: _______________________