We two sentient, free-will man and woman as Edward-Lewis and Elaine-Alice of the clan Brown, with the most honorable intent, present this true, complete, correct Affidavit of Record of Torture, to the best of our knowledge and good character of our spiritual belief:
That in the year 1994, we had made a conscious decision to challenge the Internal Revenue Service re the income tax being applied to an American man or woman when we could not find the/a law that required said man or woman to contribute/pay a federal income tax. We spent the next two years communicating with the Internal Revenue Service trying to get them to comply with the question: Will you please show us where we are required to pay the federal income tax? The silence was palpable. The I.R.S. refused to answer any presentments we sent them or telephone calls we attempted.
The Beginning (first Assault)
On November 18, 2004, at 7:30am, twenty-eight armed local and state officers and federal agents raided Elaine-Alice’s dental office. A state police sniper along with three observers, under the orders of Christopher Aucoin was positioned on the hill behind the office, with his rifle pointed at the parking lot of the office, endangering passing traffic and people in the mall parking lot directly across the street. This was witnessed by two of our contractors who happened by there on an errand. Everyone inside the office was held, not allowed to make phone calls or leave until approximately noon, after each had been interrogated privately. No such order was on the search warrant. False imprisonment. All these armed agents did was download the office computer.
A couple of weeks later, we showed the search warrant to an attorney in Lebanon, and he told us that there was no probable cause listed on the warrant.
Tort suit
Some months later, we filed a tort claim in Grafton Superior court, Judge Jean Burling presided, against the following individuals who were involved in the office raid: James John, IRS CID investigator, John Hickey, postal inspector CID, Thomas Colantuono, U.S. Attorney, New Hampshire, and William Morse, Assistant U.S. Attorney, New Hampshire. The case was soon remanded to federal court, stating that as defendants were federal employees, it was federal jurisdiction, and that the names of the defendants had to be replaced by the United States. Judge McAuliffe dismissed the case when we stated that we could not enter into federal court due to lack of jurisdiction, and our case was a state tort case, not a federal case; the criminal action of the raid was committed on private property in the New Hampshire republic.
Grand Jury
We were notified by mail that a grand jury was convened, and we were invited to attend.
However, we realized that the U.S. attorneys, Colantuono and Morse, were the same individuals that we had filed the tort claim against. Also, through the paralegal course that I, Elaine, had taken, we knew that the grand jury is nothing more than a sham, being in the pocket of the prosecutor, totally controlled by him. We stated that we would be willing to appear, if the prosecutor remained out of the room. He refused, we declined. Why would we be so foolish as to attend a grand jury that was totally controlled by the very people we had filed a tort claim against?
Second Assault (Kidnapping)
On May 24, 2006 at 6:20am our home phone rang. The caller identified herself as a Lebanon police dispatcher, saying that there was a water leak at our office building; it was running into the street, we had best get right down there. I, Edward, knew that there was no leak possible because of the back-up system I had installed, this was something else. It took me approximately twenty minutes to get there, and when I did, I saw the water department truck parked near a storm drain, with “Lebanon water department personnel” that I had never seen before. I again suspected something else was up, especially when I saw two Lebanon police officers blocking the egresses on the east side of the building. I parked my truck on the west side of the building, removed my handgun from my waist, placed it in my console and began to walk over to the building but away from the “water department personnel.” One of them called me back toward the storm drain; I hesitated, and then went over to him. As I brushed past him, he and two others swarmed me, and threw me to the ground, yelling at the top of their lungs, ordering me to get up; I replied, “I can’t, I have a thousand pounds of men on top of me.” I got up, was handcuffed behind my back, put into a Lebanon police cruiser, and was taken to the Lebanon Police Department where I was also shackled. I was there for a short time, ten or fifteen minutes, brought back out, placed into a van; I asked where they were taking me, and I was going to Concord. No one identified themselves, so I did not know by whom I was being taken to Concord. I was put into a cold holding cell at the federal court building in Concord, and kept there until about 2:30pm, when I was taken into the courtroom for “arraignment.”
Elaine in Court (arraignment)
Meanwhile, I, Elaine, went to the office to go to work as usual, arriving there approximately 7:30am. Upon arrival there, I parked my car as usual in the parking lot on the east side of the building, and started walking toward the building. There was a van parked parallel to the street in front of the storm drain, and a man standing there looking into the drain. I thought it was strange that I did not see Ed’s vehicle there, and knew something was wrong. As I approached the man, he said good morning, took my purse and my water bottle from me, as a woman stepped out from the alcove, pulled my hands behind my back and began to handcuff me. One of my employees drove into the parking lot at this time, and was stopped by a Lebanon police officer. She exited her car while the police officer was telling her to leave, and she shouted to me, “I love you.” I was immediately driven to the federal court building in Concord, at over ninety miles an hour down route 89. I was placed in a holding cell until my arraignment at 1:30.
In Shock in Court
I was taken to the hallway outside the courtroom where I met the court-appointed attorney, Bjorn Lange, and where I was first given a copy of the indictment. At the arraignment, Magistrate Muirhead allowed me to leave on personal recognizance. One condition of this was that all weapons be removed from our house, not because he felt we were a danger to society, but because he routinely does that to “protect his officers.” He stated that Ed would be held at the courthouse until the court received a phone call from the probation officer that all weapons had been removed from the house. I agreed, and left the arraignment.
At Our Home
I was driven to my home by a driver and the probation officer, Dan Gildea, who absolutely assured me that no one would be in the house or office until he arrived there to supervise. We arrived at the house at approximately 4:00pm, after stopping by the office to retrieve my vehicle. Upon arriving, I saw several agents and one or two vehicles at the end of my driveway. We drove down the driveway to the house, where I saw several agents, in and out of the house.
We entered the house, and the agents began to search for guns, and I was asked to tell them where weapons most likely were. I had to open our safe to allow them to take the guns that were in there. I was asked to leave that closet, but I refused, as there were personal papers and other items in it, and I insisted on being present while the safe was open. It took them two hours to go through the house. Unknown to me at the time, they went through the house, opened doors and drawers, photographed and video taped everything, even personal clothing in bedroom drawers, kitchen items, and more. We later discovered they had been there in the house since 11:00 that morning. There were contractors working in the house, and they were told to leave the building, and were interrogated by the agents.
When all the weapons were removed, Dan Gildea phoned the U.S. Marshals and reported that they had all been removed, and so they could release my husband. During that conversation, Mr. Gildea told the marshal that this was not a “fortress” that the marshals and the U.S. Attorney’s office had been publicly stating, but was a “lovely luxury home.”
At about 5:30 I phoned a friend, Curt Wyman, and asked him if would drive me to Concord to pick up my husband, as he had been simply removed from the courthouse and left in the street. Curt came by at 6:00, was asked by the agents if he was armed, then allowed to stay there until they all left. Curt and I then drove in Curt’s truck to Concord and picked up Ed across the street from the courthouse, getting there about 7:30
Edward Stunned In Court (Arraignment)
I, Edward, was arraigned at 2:30, with the court appointed attorney, Michael Iacapino. I was brought into the courtroom and was handed some paperwork to sign. The woman that handed me the paperwork, stating it was routine paperwork. In my confusion, not knowing procedure, and being in shock, I signed them. Mr. Muirhead asked me if I understood the charges, I answered I wasn’t sure. He asked if there was a pleading, Mr. Iacapino pled “not guilty.” I said “no,” and Mr. Muirhead took the plea anyway, as I said that Mr. Iacapino pled not guilty, I didn’t. Mr. Muirhead said something, after which I said “He (the attorney) is fired.” I didn’t know I had hired him.
The assistant U.S. attorney, William Morse, was arguing against releasing me, as I have guns, because I was associated with militia. Mr. Muirhead said that the first and second amendments are still alive, and “besides, we have F16’s.” By so saying “we,” Mr. Muirhead aligned the court with the prosecutor. Mr. Muirhead, attempting to make a contract with me, spoke to having the guns removed from the house and brought to Riley’s Gun Shop in Hooksett, for safe keeping for the duration of the trial. I agreed only with the understanding that no one would be in the house until after my wife returned home to recover the guns. Mr. Muirhead agreed, and said that no one would be in the house until that time.
However, Mr. Muirhead flat-out lied, as did Dan Gildea, as they both knew, prior to any agreement with us in the courtroom, that the U.S. Marshals had already been in the house since 11:00am that morning, photographing and video taping everything in the house. The contract was thus void before it was even signed, with knowledge by Mr. Muirhead, who by these actions by him, committed fraud, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution.
Mr. Muirhead then went on about the guns in the house, telling him that he would release me when the guns were removed as he was concerned for the safety of his officers. I frankly didn’t know why; I always considered law enforcement to be my friends.
The Trial January 6, 2007
Between this time and the start of the trial, we filed forty-two motions, about half of them challenging jurisdiction. All but one was denied, most with no objection from the prosecutor. It appears that Judge McAuliffe was objecting for the prosecutor. “Collusion?” It is the law that when jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proved before any further business can proceed. The matter of jurisdiction was never addressed by the court.
That on January 6 in the year of our Lord, 2007 in the p.m., Steven McAuliffe, adjudicating over Case # 06-CR-00071-SM, at the federal district court in Concord, New Hampshire, did in fact cause one to leave the trial that was desired by us to go to a lawful completion.
At the end of the second day of the trial, Steven McAuliffe cleared the court with the exception of the court stenographer, bailiff, himself, and us. On the record, Steven McAuliffe leaned over his pulpit and said, “Mr. and Mrs. Brown, I am going to disallow all of your evidence. I have already reviewed this material, and I’ve seen all this before.” He also allowed only one of our witnesses.
We believes that Edward told him that he, Mr. McAuliffe, could not do that, as he knows that each case has to stand on its own merits. Edward objected again, and believes Mr. McAuliffe noted the objection.
The following day, Thursday, January 8, Steven McAuliffe, about 3p.m., addressed the jury, telling them that they will find on the facts of the case, that our testimony was our opinion of the law, but that he, Mr. McAuliffe, will tell them what the law is.
At the end of that day, Mr. McAuliffe handed to us a copy of his, Mr. McAuliffe’s charge to the jury for our inspection. In the body of this document was the phrase that read that everyone is required to pay the income tax. This is not true.
As our entire case rested on the lack of a law that requires one to pay such income tax, we knew immediately that Mr. McAuliffe was attempting to sway the jury, and that this was jury tampering, and that fact that he was not going to allow evidence or witnesses, showed collusion with the U.S. Attorney’s Office with malfeasance aforethought against us.
After listening to Assistant U.S. Attorney, William Edward Morse present twenty seven witnesses and all his evidence, we realized that a level playing field was impossible to acquire in this court.
We now, thoroughly disenchanted, realizing that the court was violating the entire integrity of judicial conduct, was put in a situation of having to retreat from the field of the court, and withdraw to a safe haven, thus went home, knowing we would never receive lawful due process in that courtroom. We did not abandon case, but we were forced to retreat to a safe corner.
Our day in court regarding this tax case, which was wanted by us, was destroyed in a flash by Mr. McAuliffe. Mr. McAuliffe and Mr. Morse are, so claimed by us, to have conducted themselves in a dishonorable fashion by the action barratry, willful misconduct, affirmative misconduct, and wanton misconduct, abuse of process, malicious prosecution, vexatious suit created by the U.S. Attorney’s office, in the face of ignoring the vex question asked by us, show me the law.
(A maxim of law states that all crimes must have two components to be a crime: the act and the intent; one must do the crime, one must know one is committing a crime, and must intend to commit a crime. The structuring law states that to be convicted of this crime, it is not necessary for one to know he is committing a crime, and one need not intend to commit a crime. This is profoundly absurd. Law cannot contradict itself, and where there is a question, the decision must favor the accused. In this particular case, Mr. McAuliffe, absolutely of record, buried all moral cannons, as he told the jury that he would tell them the law.) The jury must be a fully informed jury and decide both law and fact. The judge is merely a referee.
Barratry
Barratry: vexatious incitement to litigation. We were incited to retreat from the arena thus creating further litigation that has destroyed our lives.
This entire case was only created because we, in 1994, began to question the Internal Revenue Service about the applicability of the federal income tax to Americans of the fifty union States. Note: We are aware that the IRS Code and Income Tax is applicable to citizens of the United States, Washington, DC and the insular territories known as American Samoa, American Virgin Islands, Guam, and others, corporations, certain foreign income, alcohol and tobacco businesses, and all who voluntarily sign the tax form.
Steven McAuliffe, having reviewed the evidence knew that we had won the case, which appears was his motivation to assist the Asst. U.S. Attorney, William Edward Morse, in his endeavors, to win another case, or to seek retribution against us, because we had filed a tort suit against William E. Morse, Thomas P. Colantuono, John Hickey of the U.S. Postal Service, and James John of the IRS, which case was cast off to the federal court, unlawfully.
Our claim of wanton misconduct by Mr. McAuliffe due to failure in his duty to protect our absolute rights, coupled with the knowledge that extraordinary injury would and did result. Due to his actions, and due to our having become fearful and losing all faith and confidence in the court, we did retreat; not knowing what else to do, stayed home and attempted, in our naivety, to get our case heard anyway we could find. (It has never been heard by a proper court to this day and we are still waiting).
For the next several days, we did discuss our options with our council. It was decided that Edward would remain in the home, while Elaine, out of fear, would return to court to conclude the case. Upon Elaine entering the court on the following business day, Mr. McAuliffe ordered Elaine away from my home and husband, or I would be incarcerated as of that day. I chose, again from fear, to stay with my son, and did not return home. After more than a month away from home and husband, I could no longer bear said separation, to the point I had to seek medical care for extreme stress and panic attacks (never had before), and knew that separation of husband and wife is against Biblical teaching, returned to home and husband. Upon reaching home, I removed the ankle bracelet placed on me by U.S. Probation Office on January 13. Later that day Dan Gildea phoned me, and attempted to talk me into returning to my son’s home, telling me that if I did, I might get only a ten-month sentence; this is after telling me earlier that I might get only three years, or perhaps two years. Do they lie? Judge McAuliffe issued an arrest warrant for me. I remained at home with Ed until forcibly removed, kidnapped, by U.S. Marshals on October 4, 2007, at approximately 8:00p.m.
April, 2007, “Sentencing”.
April 24, 2007 was the sentencing date. Obviously we chose not to attend the hearing. We were both sentenced to 63 months, the maximum sentence.
Following the sentencing, the theater of oppression from the government increased. The marshals cut off the electricity, Internet, television satellite, telephone, and mail. Patrols between Lebanon and Plainfield increased, as did aerial surveillance with state police fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, global hawk surveillance aircraft flying at 30,000 feet, U.S. Marshal Steve Moinier stated on the record that it flew at 50,000 feet. The fixed-wing state police aircraft flew over the house for hours at a time; circling and circling to the point to the point that I, Edward, actually called the West Lebanon airport to ask the control tower to have the aircraft retire from my airspace, as it was extremely irritating. Control tower refused, stating that he cannot comply.
Town police were also on patrol up and down the road, Chief Gordon Gillens and Officer Larry Dorr. There were individuals patrolling in the woods around the house from time to time.
Many people had been coming and going to our home since January, bringing well wishes, food, prayer meetings, etc. After the sentencing this increased tremendously. People came from all over the country, as far away as California, Florida, and Texas. Press personnel from Germany, Italy, and Scotland came to interview us. Packages from as far away as Australia. We were so happy these good folks coming to us, because this was the only way we were going to be able to get the truth out to the public, as the U.S. Attorney’s office and the courts, to this day, continue to suppress the truth of this matter. We were doing a daily talk radio show on Internet and radio, Radio Broadcast Network, and we observed that the only truth that was getting out was in that venue. We also were able to speak on other networks, such as The Power Hour with Joyce Riley and Dave vonKleiss, Pastor Butch’s radio evening program, etc.
The main-stream media was not reporting accurately, but demonizing us constantly. Margo Sanger-Katz of the Concord Monitor, owned by George Wilson (also owns the Valley News in the Upper Valley) particularly did us harm. In her first article concerning us was after the arraignment in 2004, she wrote that we had half a million dollars in cash in our home, and all our weapons had been removed from the house. To say this is irresponsible journalism is an understatement; she set us up to be robbed or killed. Since that time she has gone out of her way to demonize us and print lies about us. She has also written that we were convicted of hiding income to avoid paying taxes, which is not true. This has been typical of all the main-stream media, which is the reason that, toward the end, we would no longer allow them onto our property.
June 7 – Shots Fired
Saturday morning, beautiful day, very early, the complex of the situation totally changes, suddenly gets very serious and very dangerous.
Danny, our house guest, makes himself a cup of coffee. He decides to take a walk along the driveway, Zoe, our German shepherd, goes with him. As he approaches the end of the driveway, he notices the bushes across the road have been evenly cut, like a hedge, and he sees someone in the woods behind them. He calls out, “Hey, are you hunting turkey?” Danny now notices the man is in camouflage, and has an automatic weapon, aiming it at him. Danny now turns, and starts to run back down the driveway toward the house. Two shots are fired, going just by his head as he runs. He now yells, “Don’t shoot, I’m unarmed!” (He is wearing shorts and a short-sleeve tee shirt and sneakers – clearly unarmed). At this time, twelve fully camouflaged soldiers, six in the woods on either side of the driveway, with full automatic weapons come at him and swarm him, shove him to the ground, and tazer him, yelling something about how he had spoiled their mission. One of the soldiers shouts into his radio, “Shots have been fired, shots have been fired!” (He does not specify who fired the shots), seemingly in an effort to give the impression that we had fired, because a helicopter, within a minute or so flew over the edge of the field once, then retreated.
I, Edward, come out of the house a couple of minutes after Danny goes for his walk. I am standing on the front steps enjoying the early morning sun, when I hear two shots – boom, boom- muffled through the trees. About thirty seconds Zoe comes tearing down the driveway toward me. Instead of coming up to me, she runs right past me and into the house. This is when I see the helicopter. Half a minute later the telephone rings; a friend is calling to tell me they saw three state troopers in front of a tank and three state troopers behind it, heading south in my direction. He also he had seen the same thing about an hour earlier.
Now we know they are coming to kill us. Visions of Ruby Ridge and Waco are clear in our minds. We had watched the live coverage and the videos of both these tragedies, and our situation has the earmarks of both. Until that moment, we could not envision our government killing us over a tax matter, the law for which had never been shown. Now we know they are going to. We only have in the house a shot gun that the marshals had missed when they took the guns in May of 2006, and a hand gun that was given to me by a dying friend.
Danny is now taken to St. Gauden’s National Park on Route 12A, south of Plainfield village, and interrogated. He is threatened with possible life in prison if he ever tells what actually happened. We have cell phones that had been given to us by many people, which we now use to begin calling out to let others know the situation. We are extremely frightened. Another phone call comes in notifying me that in the field on the corner of Stage Rd. and Route 12A in Plainfield, there are an ambulance, two tanks, a fire truck, a bomb truck, a helicopter, and over a dozen state police cruisers, and some thirty to forty personnel, consisting of U.S. Marshals, state police, town police, etc. Now we have an army poised to attack us. The marshals later stated that the reason they were there was to serve us papers about the Lebanon property being seized. Danny is ordered by the marshals to say nothing difference or else. As we make more phone calls, supporters start to come to us.
In late afternoon, Danny returns to the house. He informs us that the marshals dropped him off at the bottom of the hill, a two mile road, and he walked up to the house. Danny is terrified, he is a nervous wreck, as he had been interrogated by the marshals for several hours, was warned about speaking the truth about what happened, and told never to return Here. Danny gets into his car and leaves.
Now that we knew that they were intent on killing us, we began to accept the offers of munitions from various places, in order that we may be able to defend ourselves. We knew conflict was imminent. I refused a great deal of items that were highly volatile, because we did not wish to hurt anybody, only to protect ourselves. If the government uses two tanks, helicopter, fixed-wing aircraft, spy plane, an army of snipers and battle-ready soldiers, to attack two people who were merely trying to get an answer to a question of law, then what does the law state these two people are supposed to do to protect themselves when they know they did not break the law.
Under lethal force definitions under RSA’s, it states that if anyone whose life or property is being threatened, they are in absolute right to use equal or greater force. This is universal – International Law, Military Law, Law of Nations, Federal Law, all concur. The New Hampshire Constitution, and the Declaration of Independence state **We now believe that the government was insane and totally out of control. We also began to understand what Randy Weaver and his family, as well as Waco church experienced. We knew that Randy Weaver’s family was very spiritual with God, as well as was the Waco church, as well as we are. Could this possibly be a move against spiritual or God-loving people? It couldn’t possibly be because of the income tax question. We are still inclined to think that is the case, in addition to the fact that we dared to challenge them.
As frightened as we were, we could not submit to intimidation from anyone violating our absolute rights under both man and God. We are Americans, of God and country, in the purest sense of the word. We are even-handed, helpful, and composed under any circumstances, no matter how critical the situation. We were feeling at the time of this incident, that we were the only stable-minded people in the area. Even our neighbors were joining with the government and attacking us verbally, some in a vile manner. Mr. Copp, our close neighbor, in an FBI report, said that I, Edward, conducted homosexual acts, specifically that I “give blow-jobs.” Defamation of character? $$$$?
It must be kept in mind what Thomas Jefferson said, “All that is needed for evil to prevail is that good men do nothing.” Someone must stand.
This incident changed
June 2007 Concert
A concert at our home was announced by the radio networks we were broadcasting on: RBN, Genesis, WTPRN. Three rock bands contributed their time and talent for entertainment. Food was provided by the radio network. People came and went all day long, and into the night. Some brought sleeping bags, tents, and RV’s and stayed the weekend, brought their families, small children. Dave vonKleiss also provided much entertainment with his guitar, accompanying himself while he sang some of the songs he has written, all aimed at freedom and justice. He had even written one for us, and he named it “Show Me the Law.” It was a delightful day, with many good and fine people, including Randy Weaver, who drove in with the WTPRN radio crew from Texas. Randy spoke to the crowd, as did many of us, sadly recalling the day his wife and 14 year old son, Sammy, was murdered by the federal agents who shot him in the back as he was running away from them to the safety of his home. They even killed Sammy’s dog. Randy and the WTPRN crew stayed with us for about a week. Actually, many people stayed with us for extended periods of time during those months. We are so grateful to them, and honored that so many came to us out of love and support, in a time of official oppression in our once great country.
***
A Country at War With Itself
It appears we have a nation divided; we appears we have a nation attacking itself; it appears we have a government that is so far out of control, that they have lost the vision and sight of what America’s destiny is all about. As we observed our local police, county, state, and federal governments working in collusion to attack their own people who have supported them all their lives, and who are only working to bring the county to a higher quality and standard of living, having harmed no one or thing in any way, our question, then, is why? Why would they be so adamant in their actions in attempting to silence our question of ‘show me the law’ of these taxes, the answer to which we are guaranteed by their own laws and every other laws in the world? We still ask it today, “Show Me the Law.”
July Concert
The concert was repeated in mid-July, again with the same general format, but with an added factor: a Homeland Security helicopter that came in just over the tops of the trees, about 150 feet in the air, from about 1pm. They were close enough so you could be hit by the prop wash from the blades, clearly endangering everyone in the area. If something would have happened to it, such as mechanical failure, many people could have been injured or killed. They continuously harassed the entire festivities with their loud noise, and after dark, their immensely bright spot-lights, even aiming these lights into the windows of our house. They circled the perimeter of our opening continuously except for the two times they had to leave to refuel. Again we are reminded of how childish our government officials can be. What purpose did flying a circle over a picnic for eight hours serve to anyone except to attempt to frighten and intimidate little children and dogs? Early in the evening, I, Edward, phoned the Lebanon airport and asked the control tower to please have the helicopter retire at 9:30 to above 1,000 feet, as we were going to have fireworks, and did not want them in harm’s way. Promptly at 9:30 they flew over, flashed their lights, and left the area. We had our fireworks. That ended the festivities. Most people stayed for the night in their RV’s, tents, etc. until the following day.
More Shots Fired
Later in July, a Saturday night about 11pm, about thirty-six shots were fired from a semi-automatic rifle, in the northeast woods behind the house, about 1500 feet away, near our 10-acre beaver pond. Shortly afterwards people were heard moving through the woods on the west side of the property, behind the barn. We heart two more shots off in the distance to the northwest, probably from one of the roads near the power lines. It was an extremely foggy night, and anyone could sneak up quite close in that fog. Around 2am, Old Buck, sitting in his motor home, called down to us on his cell phone saying that someone was rocking his motor home and banging on the side of it. This occurred two or three times over the next hour or so.
In our home that night were Jason and Danny. With the first shots, Danny phoned WTPRN to report what was happening. WTPRN interrupted their regular broadcast, and put Danny on the air. They kept Danny on the air the entire night while this was happening, with Danny telling them what was happening while it was happening. It was later reported to us that so many people called 911 to protest the action, and demanding that local and county officials go in and protect the Browns that the emergency lines were totally overwhelmed to the point that the 911 personnel shut down the lines.
Later, Plainfield Police Chief Gordon Gillens publicly stated that the incident never happened, that we just made it all up to gain attention. ?????????
To this day we do not know who was doing the shooting and other harassing, if it was the marshals or just some local good ole boys whooping it up on a Saturday night after getting liquored up.
There were no further incidents after 4:30am as the sun was coming up.
Concert Interrupted – September
A third concert was scheduled for mid-September. On that morning, we started to notice that no one was coming in. As we soon learned, the marshals had blocked the road and were not allowing anyone to come to us. They were also taking people’s ID’s and registration numbers. They had set up a tent and were bringing some people into it for questioning. Lauren Canario, when she was prevented from driving to our home, she parked her transport, got out of it, and began to walk up the road. Marshals stopped her physically, cuffed and arrested here, took her in. We were later told that several people gathered at the bottom of the hill, and had a prayer meeting for us, until ordered to move by the Plainfield police. It appears every time some form of worship is conducted the police get upset and break it up.
Assaulted and Kidnapped!
Beginning of October, (we were alone in the house for the first time), around midnight, our friend, Shaun from Illinois, drove in with a man in his truck. Shaun introduced him as ‘Dutch,’ a supporter whom he had met. Dutch/Dan wished to help us in any way he could. Shaun did not stay, but left after about a half hour. This was suspicious; to drive from Illinois, arrive at midnight, then turn around and drive back? Makes no sense.
Dutch told us he was a bounty hunter and did property retrieval, with a few men whom he employed from time to time. I, Elaine, had told Dutch that there were some supplies at the office I would like to have, as I had set up a dental operatory in the house, and had been doing dentistry there. He offered to bring in some of his associates, to go get the supplies. He stated that he loved retrieving from the feds. He went to the office and checked it out, telling us he found that the marshals had put alarms on the doors, but he could get around them. When I asked him why he would do all this for people he had never met, his answer was, “Because I love you guys.”
I, Edward, went out for a walk one afternoon with the dog; Dutch offered to come along. As I was walking around the edge of the property, Dutch continuously moved in very close behind me, which forced me to move faster, jumping over stone walls and such to keep ahead of him. He acted very suspicious, as he continued to try to close the distance between us. Finally, when I got up near the solar panels, I kept myself always facing him from that time until we returned to the house. Something seemed wrong with this man.
Dutch was with us for about three days. During this time I filled two of his teeth that had decay in them; he paid me, then of course took the money back later.
He called in his men, four of them. The night of October 4, three of the men, including Dutch, went to the office, two stayed at the house. One was complaining that he didn’t want to do this. I, Edward, told him that he’ll be alright, just relax; no one is going to hurt him. He is the same one who later tazered me.
Edward’s Narrative
At approximately 5pm, I, phoned Joyce Riley at the Power Hour radio talk show, and our friend, Bernie Bastian, in Weare, N.H., notifying them that I believed we had federal agents on the property, meaning Dutch and his crew. Bernie asked me if I wanted him to come up. I said no, I want to see how this is going to play out. I didn’t want to get anyone else involved.
They were gone about an hour and a half. When they returned with several black plastic trash bags, I told them to place the bags on the ground outside the open garage door, which they did. I was inside the garage; two of them entered the garage as if they were going to pass through the house. I asked them to step back out and go around the other way, which they did. As I did not know who any of these men were, especially Dutch, I always had protection with me, as I did that night in the garage. As a rifle, shotgun, and pistol instructor for many years, first acquired through the NRA many years ago, and having full and complete clearance from the FBI a few months prior to all this, my history with firearms, including a Federal Firearms License, a previous license to sell, both state and federal, which I relinquished years ago, no long needing it, I was well versed in the safety of firearms. Dutch claimed that I pointed a gun at him at some point. He is in error. When you handle firearms as long as I have, and are as safety conscious as I am, anyone will tell you, it is instinctive that you never point at someone unless you are going to fire. I had no inclination, unless I was ever threatened in kind. The law is very clear on this.
The men then produced pizzas from their truck, which they had picked up in town on their way back to the house. We had the beer, and we then all sat on the front porch eating pizza and drinking beer. We were talking about everything and nothing. Ed sat by the open front door of the house, Elaine was off to the side a bit, the men were seated around, and in front of us. One of the agents got in between us, using Zoe as a reuse, luring her to a position between Ed and Elaine by feeding her bits of pizza. He was too close to me, Elaine, at which point I knew. Ed picked up on it at the same time. He turned, started in through the open door, and was immediately swarmed by two of the men, knocked to the floor, and tazered. At the same time, I, Elaine, was grabbed by Dutch, held immobile, and then tazered by the same agent who tazered Ed. What is it with tazering when one is immobilized? Danny, Edward, and Elaine all subdued, and tazered after, rather than the other way around.
We are now handcuffed and led outside into the yard. Ed was placed in a van, and left. There were two fully battle-dressed uniformed soldiers in the truck with automatic weapons. I, Edward, was taken to the Lebanon Police Department where I was strip-searched, bent over, forced to spread the cheeks of my buttocks, and raise my testicles. I was told to re-dress, forced to be finger-printed, and put into a holding cell. By this time I was shackled. Approximately an hour later, Elaine arrived, and was placed in another cell around the corner where we could not see each other. After about five minutes or so, the agent(?) who brought Elaine in, came to the door of my cell, and started asking me about the taxes, and yelling at me that I should have paid the taxes. I thought this rather odd; what business was it of his at this point? He suddenly noticed something on his left leg. It was excrement, smeared along his leg, which made me suspect that he had his leg in a place where he should not have. My thoughts perhaps were a little wild at the time; however, he is the one who arrested my wife, and either he or someone else tazered my wife, and the last vision I had of my wife, was where he had her bent over at the bottom of the steps, handcuffing her behind her back, before I was taken away, when she said “Honey you were right”. She meant we knew that they were agents.
Elaine’s Narrative
I, Elaine was held there at the house for an hour or more. Several full-battle dressed soldiers, with automatic weapons now descended on the house in several vehicles. They dispersed around the property, ‘securing’ the outbuildings, kicking open the porta-potty door, the door to the generator house, opening the barn, the shed. One stood beside the front steps with his weapon. The agents were trying to get Zoe to come off the steps; she was standing there, apparently in stress and confusion, could not move. I told the agent to back off with his weapon which was in Zoe’s sight, as she is gun-shy. He did so, but Zoe still would not come, not even to me. Eventually one of the agents was able to grab her, and leash her.
The agent who cuffed me held on to me the entire time. At one point he was screaming in my ear about paying taxes, doing the right thing, and such. I told him to stop yelling in my ear, as I wouldn’t listen to him. He said he will yell at me all he wants, and I would listen to him. At other times, he was saying how glad he was that they had been able to capture us without harming us. I wondered if he was perhaps bi-polar, as he seemed to vacillate between good guy and bad guy – extreme behavior swings.
He asked me if anyone else was in the house, I told him only the cat. I asked him for my glasses and asthma medications which were on the kitchen counter. He would not allow me to have them. He said no one could go into the house at this time. I said that Dutch could go in, as he had been in there and knew where my things were. He told me that Dutch had already left.
Eventually I was placed in a van and driven directly to Wyatt Detention Center in Central Falls, R.I. Incarceration to follow in next installment.
NOTE: Elaine and I sensed that this had to be over. Being confined to our home, depending on others for all our needs, sleeping always with one ear open, wondering when we would be attacked and probably killed, created an unbelievable stress factor. We were always tired, always watching, wondering if they were in the woods around the house, hearing and seeing the demonizing of us by the media, calling our home a “compound,” (in the 1960’s, when the Kennedy compound was referred to, it was a positive term), a fortress because we had the addition of concrete, which is extremely energy efficient, and which Florida has mandated for new home construction in some areas), with an upper deck for relaxation and views, which they called a ‘watch tower,’ meaning a military installation.
All this because we asked them to “Show Us the Law.” We hurt no one, no property, in any way, shape or form. The only damaged parties were us, and we were destroyed by U.S. Attorney’s Office gone mad, using official oppression and in collusion with the courts, to get another notch in its political gun. The only thing we are guilty of, and I, Edward, say this as a United States Constitution Ranger of the Second Continental Congress of 1777, so filed in the Library of Congress, under number TXu 42-453. Our mission as Rangers is “to protect and serve the constitutions for the several States, Republics, and the Constitution for the united States of America, a Republic, and the people thereof under God.”
As a man and woman who love God, country, and each other, we will not tolerate a government gone so far out of control, that it turns on the very people who are sworn to protect and uphold truth, justice and the American way.
Anatomy
of a Government Setup: Is the spirit of Elaine Brown speaking
candidly to the Court Imposed Federal Public Defender that of a
Criminal, or Victim of Tyranny?
Bjorn Lange
Asst. Federal Public Defender
22 Bridge St.
Concord, N.H. [03301]
June 10, 2009
Dear Bjorn:
Today Ed and I received the copy of your motion to the court. Some points I must clarify, on and for the record.
You are the court appointed full counsel for defendant, ELAINE BROWN, not for Elaine Brown as written in the first line of the motion. Remember, we maintain and preserve our position of being separate from the legal fiction of ELAINE BROWN and EDWARD BROWN. Also, we are not “defendants,” we are the Secured Party Creditors for the defendants, EDWARD BROWN and ELAINE BROWN.
Page 2, we have the right under God, Laws of Nations, and all laws, including the law of common sense, not just under the 6th Amendment, to have and present all evidence, and all witnesses, favorable to us.
Constant reminder, we are not felons; we never had a proper initial trial, no law was shown that we violated, and again the defendants were EDWARD BROWN and ELAINE BROWN, not us. We were forced into a position of impossibility.
The entire first trial was because we asked the government a question they refused to answer. As they are required by law, even in their own 1040 Instruction Manual that they will answer any question, they broke their own laws. We are instructed into civil disobedience in the Declaration of Independence and also in Article 10 of the New Hampshire Constitution.
On page 5, and further, you state we were convicted of money laundering. We were never convicted or charged with money laundering. Even Judge McAuliffe stated to the jury during the trial that there was no money laundering in this case. We were convicted of structuring, which was instituted to track money laundering, so as there was no such money laundering, how did we get convicted of structuring, let alone charged with it? As we knew we had violated no laws, we could not voluntarily walk into prison. The first trial showed us we could expect nothing different from the appellate court, especially in light of Justice Wright’s statement that the appellate court is there to shoot the survivors of the lower courts.
Also, page 5, you state that I returned to my home at Ed’s urging. This is false. He did not know I was coming home; this was entirely my decision after an entire night of prayer, asking for guidance to know what I should do. It is wrong for a husband and wife to be separated, I could not bear to be away from my husband, so I packed up and went home. No one knew I was going until I got there. Ed was totally surprised, as he had not attempted to talk me into doing so. Confirming the false concept that I am under the control of my husband does neither of us any good; it makes me appear stupid, and Ed domineering.
Page 5, the statement that I have “sufficient colorable claims,” I do not understand, as “colorable” is defined as not true, intended to deceive, counterfeit, in Black’s Law Dictionary. This is offensive, and I do not understand why you would say this claim is colorable. Our claims were placed by affidavit, not rebutted, just ignored, denied by the court as frivolous. Black’s goes on to say that said claims are often false. Again I do not understand why you wrote colorable.
Page 5, top of page, numbers 1 through 5, we thank you for putting that in, as it describes exactly our position.
On page 6, is the statement that much of the telephone conversation with the marshals was with Ed; there were no conversations with the marshals and me except to say hello when answering the phone before handing it to Ed. Contrary to Moinier’s statement, there was never any conversation with him be either of us.
Also, page 6, if memory serves, communication with the marshals ceased well before June 7, and the marshals stopped our mail, phone, Internet, television, electric service right after the sentencing date April 23 or 24. They phoned 2 to 3 times a week at first, gradually tapered off to once a week, then once every two or three weeks. Ed constantly informed Gary DiMartino that we had committed no crimes, thus how could we submit to surrendering to an unlawful prison term.
The case number in 2007 was 06-CR-00071-01/02-SM.
Page 7, thank you for the Garner quote. Please note that contrary to statements by the press and the marshals, we never threatened anyone. We stated publicly that we would never go on the offensive, but would act only in self defense.
Page 8, all motions were denied by the court, except the one for extension of time for the trial. As you saw when you reviewed that docket, these were good and valid motions, not involving anything to do with UCC, but rather according to the procedures accepted by and acceptable to the court.
Page 9 – there were 14 different agencies? MJTF – Multi-jurisdictional Task Force. We notice there was listed no presence by the Sullivan County Sheriff’s Department. It is the sheriff’s duty to protect the inhabitants of the county from unlawful action and invasion. Sheriff Prozo seemed to be always “out of town” each time an occurrence happened. We need to know why, we would want him in court as a witness. He and Ed had several conversations in the past about the sheriff’s duty. Prozo told Ed that he would do whatever the state told him to do. The state has no authority over the sheriff; he is the highest law enforcement officer in the country in his own county. See Ney (?) County in Nevada, Sheriff Mack, who threw he feds out of his county as having no jurisdiction, upheld in court.
Does the presence of the National Guard as part of the MJTF on June 7 violate the posse comitatus doctrine – can’t use the military against the citizens?
We have wanted a trial on the income tax matter from day one, but the government is making sure it does not happen. This is malicious prosecution beyond doubt. Recall the officer’s statement to Ed in prison, that Ed was being so mistreated because he “pissed off a lot of people.” The government is supposed to be above such actions and motivations, insuring fairness, and freedom from prosecution for exercising one’s rights of protest.
Note: you, Michael, and the court have been avoiding the issue of the names; our claims are sincere and definitive, yet they are continuously denied by the court as frivolous. Yet the government has NEVER come forward with a point by point response or rebuttal to our claims. Just like in the first case, would it not be easier for the government to show us the law that disclaims our position? They can’t! We understand that, as there is no response, except fabrication by the government against people such as us, to try to silence the truth and facts. There is no law obligating us to pay an income tax; there is nothing disputing our position in commerce and law. More and more, people will turn and are turning to this position. There is just too much evidence attesting to its truth.
Final note: we are not felons, we have violated no law.
In your previous motion regarding my competence, it appears that the court appointed counsel for the defense doubts his client’s mental state. Does this not hurt us? It was all over the media that you said I show signs of being delusional and under the undue influence of my husband. I was truly shocked when I read it. Perhaps you had a reason for doing this. So this is what goes out to public, with no avenue for us to contradict it. How prejudicial is this! How biased and unfair is this! How can we not think there is collusion among the court, the media, the US Attorney? There appears to be no attorney who believes our position or is even willing to study it. A reversal or a major change in one’s beliefs is most difficult for us to come to. It infers that we have been wrong in our beliefs and resultant actions, that we have perhaps been duped, not smart enough to have figured out the deception or falsehood on our own. But we must get past the emotion of it all, and come to the intellectual, common sense and reason. The introduction to Thomas Paine’s “Common Sense” addresses this; I wrote an article on it in a letter to the editor of the Valley News some time ago.
The government has to make us appear incompetent or delusional, because the truth is so damaging to them. …………….. I find myself speechless that treason being conducted by all these players is almost unfathomable to us. ……… Many of them will end up in prison themselves, as the people come to realize how they have been hoodwinked. It takes a lot for the majority to revolt against tyranny and oppression, but the day is coming, and when they do, it will be wonderful and fearsome.
We will see you next Wednesday.
God’s blessings.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
June 4, 2009
Dear Michael and Bjorn,
Here are some thoughts we have.
Government has placed us in a position of impossibility from the first day November 18, 2004, by coming at us at the office with a small army of 28 armed personnel, which included snipers, just to download a computer.
We have harmed no one; we are the victims.
We took the search warrant to a local attorney, he claimed there was no probable cause on the search warrant.
I and all my employees were held incommunicado, not allowed to leave or make a phone call, this was not listed on the search warrant; each was questioned individually and in private.
Not Mirandized, words were later used in court.
This resulted in our action of filing a tort claim in Grafton County Superior Court against Colantuono, James John, Muirhead, John Hickey (may be more, can’t recall).
New Hampshire Judge Jean Burling moved the case to federal court upon order from the attorneys for the defendants.
We had no ability to enter into the federal jurisdiction on a state tort claim, so we denied their invitation to hear the case there.
Some time later we received invitation to appear before the grand jury; we said we would if the U.S. attorney was not present in the room influencing the grand jury; Morse declined to stand out, we declined to enter.
We are the victims.
On May 24, 2006 we were violently arrested by a sting operation by feds and local Lebanon police, shackled, handcuffed, taken into custody without any word why.
At arraignment, Muirhead aligned the court with the U.S. by his statement, when Morse was arguing against our release until trial, arguing that we had guns, “So what, we have F16’s.”
Muirhead also had us sign a contract known as the release conditions that all guns at our home would be released to the marshals by Elaine before Edward would be allowed to be released, and we were assured by him and by Probation Officer Dan Gildea that no one would be allowed to enter our home until Elaine arrived with the probation officer. Officers had been in the house and all around our property since 11:00 that morning, before the contracts were signed. (Arraignments were in the afternoon.) They both lied.
Edward did not plead, did not accept an attorney, the attorney present pled not guilty for me, I refused the plea. (Rule 10 of FRCrP states that Rule 5 provides that a magistrate cannot call for a plea from a defendant in a case where the magistrate cannot try the case.)
We submitted 40+ motions to the court (good motions), done by a professional legal service, all were denied, many without objections from the prosecutor. About half of them challenged jurisdiction, jurisdiction was never addressed, although the law states that jurisdiction, when challenged, must be proved.
We are the victims.
Since 1992 we had been communicating with the IRS, asking them to show us he law requiring us to pay the income tax; our letters were never answered, we sent them court decisions and other information supporting our claim, no answer, although they are required by law to answer. Eg, supreme court decision that the 16th Amendment conferred no new taxing powers on Congress, that what was not taxable before the 16th Amendment remains untaxable after it.
In 1996 we sent the IRS a notice that until they answered our question, and showed us the law obligating us to pay the tax, proving our liability to do so, we would not contribute into their coffers.
Why did we do this? So many Americans have had their lives shattered, families, businesses, homes destroyed because of the absolute misapplication of the income tax, that someone had to stand up and seriously challenge it. Also, we had seen the horrors and injustice perpetrated at Ruby Ridge and Waco, where the U.S. Attorney/DOJ sent in an army and committed murder and were never held accountable for it. As a pro-American government couple, we were and still are concerned about the very dangerous course our country is sailing into. We wanted to know who was at the helm, and why they were sailing us into such dangerous waters. We found out. and that triggered these events.
We have been wrongly labeled “anti-government.” we are not; we are anti-abuse of government, against criminal element in government (CEG).
We have harmed no one; we are the victims.
The Declaration of Independence and the New Hampshire Constitution direct the people to civil disobedience when the government no longer serves the needs of the people. “All that is needed for evil to abound is that good men do nothing.”- Thomas Jefferson.
We are giving you all the above information because the current case stems from this set of circumstances that was orchestrated to escalate us into a negative scenario by the U.S. Attorney/DOJ office.
Additional notes:
N.H. RSA 6-627:3-8 that I sent you, Bjorn re lethal force. also section 5
Structuring charges: conflict of law, as all crime has 2 elements, act and intent, but the structuring law states that neither the intent to commit a crime nor the knowledge that the action IS a crime are not necessary, law cannot contradict itself. Also, it was instituted to track money laundering, no money laundering involved as so stated by McAuliffe. Violates Cheek v. US (this was in some of our motions) entrapment? Impossibility – do we all check all the laws before doing anything?
Because we know we committed no crime, and were not ‘felons’ we would not voluntarily walk into prison. We had to bring the public’s attention to the unlawful activity of the IRS, and now of the court/US Attorney/DOJ.
We are the victims.
Agents/officers lie; Moinier stated re June 7, 2007 that no shots were fired, then changed his statement to only non-lethal bullets were fired, then changed it again to they were not aiming to hit him. Plainfield Police Chief Gordon Gillens lied about the night in July when 30 or so shots were fired around our house that the incident never happened, we were only looking for attention. He was nowhere near there.
The U.S. Attorney will most likely try to bring up “militia” connection to taint us. Suppress? The militia is actually for defense of the country, and is not what today’s popular opinion of it is. Who fought in the Revolutionary War? The Militia.
Regarding Old Buck. His first name is Jim, can’t remember his last name. I have asked for his phone number from a friend, hopefully he still has it. I have it in my address book, which is back in Carswell. I asked to have it sent, it never was. If it is possible to do so, someone at Carswell can get it from my property and look it up under “J”, entry “Jim” or send it overnight to me or to you. The day he came to our house, in May? he was stopped by the Lebanon police on route 12A in West Lebanon near Friendly’s Restaurant, because he had signs all over his RV to “Free Ed and Elaine Brown,” things to that effect. Also, the U.S. Marshals often followed him around when he would go into town. So both Lebanon Police Dept. and the U.S. Marshals should know his info.
We will send more as we think of it, or you need it.
Open letter from Edward-Lewis: and Elaine-Alice;Brown
April 12, 2009
We sit here in Strafford Cty. Jail, pondering the issue of utilizing attorneys in this onslaught of persecution from the federal government. No matter how we look at it, after researching attorneys’ functions, the definitions of attorneys and whom they represent or present, it all comes down to all attorneys operate in legal fiction as foreign agents, dealing in private corporate law (61 million of them) that is understood only the courts and attorneys can understand. Or do they – how can anyone understand 61 million laws?
We live under God’s Laws, approximately 100 laws (?), and commercial law, which has about 1,000 laws. These are easily understood and can be learned by anyone. These laws are based on time-tested contract for over 6,000 years. See Shetar Law of the Jews, contract law based on the Laws of God and honest business dealings with their fellow man. These rules are time-tested and true substantial law. \The Koran, in the Second Surah, tells us, “Men need laws to lead orderly lives, but these laws must be based on the eternal principles of righteousness and fair-dealing.” The Bible orders us to love our neighbor as ourselves along with the Ten Commandments, for living righteous lives.
The court has appointed two stand-by attorneys – one a ‘public’ defender, the other a private attorney. We thought stand-by attorneys were to stand by us as private man and woman, not the ‘public’? We have informed the court that we do not consent to their attorney appointments, and we do not consent to participate in any proceedings in this matter.
Edward’s court-appointed attorney told him some weeks ago that “they intend to bury you, and if they feel you are putting together a viable defense, they will separate you and not allow you to further consult together.” What madness is this? Given this statement, why would we or any sane or competent man or woman walk into their arena and attempt to play by their rules? This is why we walked out the first time.
When asked a few days ago what he thought our chances are of winning this case, the attorneys alluded there was no chance of winning this case. Like in the first case, we were denied virtually all evidence and witnesses; we are again told by these attorneys that the judge would only allow what “he deems pertinent.” The law has stipulated for several hundred years that we are absolutely allowed to bring forth any and all evidence or witnesses that favors our position. The U.S. Attorney’s office is allowed thousands of pieces of evidence, unlimited resources of money, manpower, investigative means, means of keeping their information secret until they wish to disclose (see enclosed notice to court, “Notice and Response to U.S. Attorney’s Statements of Benefits to “Defendants”).
Today we received a letter in the mail from the public defender stating that they are having a difficult time being able to aid in this case because we are not following “their” prescribed procedures and methods. They seem to need a ruling from the court as to how to proceed.
Everyone make note, if we follow the court/government procedures, we will now be relying on them to state our case or position. That would mean that we are incompetent, insane, or a child, when if fact the only reason that we would need or could use an attorney for is to interpret the legal fiction private law that they operate under. They have told us that they cannot help us in the manner in which we are proceeding, the very lawful Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), under which the court, the entire government, state, federal, county, city, town, all corporations in the world, operate. We are trying to apply the same law that they are using in that courtroom right now, yet the court has denied all our Notices as being “frivolous.” So, if the court is telling us that everything we are doing is frivolous, standing on our own as man and woman of God, then the confusion comes from the fact that the court/government operates under legal law (form and style of law), , v. lawful law (substance of law, God’s law, if you will) , which we operate under.
Going into their courtroom which operates as a fiction, would require us, flesh-and-blood man and woman created by God, to present ourselves as legal fictions, known as the “strawman” .This would be a dishonor to God. A fiction cannot interact with the real, a corporation (the government is a corporation since 1871) can only interact with another corporation, as corporations are fictions, existing only on paper. The all capital letter name by which the government address us, is a fiction. Look up “strawman” on the Internet for in-depth explanation of this, and of the fraud perpetrated on us by the government.
So you can see just a small part of the paradox of what the court/government is placing us in, and how and why they win 99% of their cases. The court, working in collusion with the Department of Justice U.S. Attorney’s Office, is protecting the information of the bankruptcy of the United States of June 5, 1933, at any and all costs.
Every single case, criminal as well as civil, state as well as federal, is operating to keep the fact that all of us in America were declared slaves, pledged as surety for the bankruptcy of the United States, as of that date. There is no lawful law, only Law of Necessity (War Law). The United States Corporation government declared all Americans “enemies” under the Amendatory Act (48 Stat.1) of March 9, 1933 to the Trading With the Enemies Act of 1917.
How can anyone use attorneys when they are all pledged to protecting the bankruptcy with a set of laws no one can understand? We all must stand under God’s Laws and commercial law, all of which date back to the beginning of civilization. It is the obligation of everyone to hold the course in righteousness and fairness, in order that we may benefit equally, and with justice for all mankind.
Letter to the Editor
Death of America - Courts
The Department of Homeland Security has recently issued a pronouncement adding more Americans to its hit list of “enemies of the state.” Now included as said “enemies” are 2nd Amendment activists, people in favor of tighter immigration laws, people who complain about Obama, people in opposition to free trade, anyone in defense of marriage, anti-communists, anti-globalists, and people who are upset that manufacturing jobs are moving to China.
Interesting note: the head of the Department of Homeland Security is a former communist KGB agent. Does this not fit in with anti-communists now being “enemies of the state?” Could this mean that DHS is a communist organization, inside our government, meant to protect our country against those who would seek to destroy it? Does our government now do the exact opposite of what it says?
The death of America is now; it is not sometime in the future, it is not a figment of the imagination of the “conspiracy theorists.” How can so much wrong be done by so many differing agencies, if they are not working together for a common goal?
Example, the courts work in collusion with the U.S. Attorneys/DOJ to keep the prisons full by operating as a full fledged turn-style industry generating millions of dollars each day. Note a quote by an assistant (third in command) city of Los Angeles attorney under Gil Garcetti in 1999, stating that his primary duty was “generating new business for attorneys.”
The prisons then make billions of dollars off the prisoners each year, with no accountability. Each prison receives $4800 per month for each prisoner, yet the cost is $3000 per month to maintain. Some prisons takes in about $10,000 per day in commissary purchases by prisoners (45 cents for a 44 cent stamp, 35 cents for a tea bag. $1.20 for one sleeve of Ritz crackers).
Every prisoner has a monetary value to the government – local, county, state, federal. Bonds are written based on the person’s name and social security number and sold through brokerage firms such as AG Edwards, who have contracts to sell all the prison bonds. Half of these bonds are purchased in Japan or China.
At the courthouse, each alleged crime has a monetary value attached to it; bonds (Blake bonds) are posted, factored by a factor of ten and more, and sold as bank securities – prisoners for profit. Could this be the reason there are more prisoners in America than in any other country? It’s all about the money, folks. Go to “Owners of the Prison System in America.”
In conclusion for this writing, there are no longer any courts of justice in America. It is nothing but a business enterprise for the U.S. Attorneys/DOJ/courts/prison system. The courts operate in contractual/admiralty law, which is in direct violation of what was guaranteed to us under the organic constitution. If you look for justice in the world today, you will not find it in the court system. We had discovered this in January, 2007 in the U.S. District Court in New Hampshire under magistrate James Muirhead, and judge Steven McAuliffe, realizing that all due process was thrown out the door by these two men, we were forced to retreat to our home, and disallowed a trial that we wanted. THERE ARE NO COURTS IN AMERICA TODAY. Pray for America’s future; in God we trust, there is no one else.
Edward-Lewis:Brown©
Elaine-Alice:Brown©
May 21, 2009
Re: What Remedy Is Left to the Sovereign People Of America
When Its Government Sanctions Piracy On the Highway
"paris" <paris_1000@verizon.net> wrote:
"Raymond Karczewski" <arkent3@earthlink.net> wrote:
p: > it sounds like with your last statement that you are condemning your own thought processes that you used to construct your argument.. with that in mind I suppose you must be using that "Satanic Weapon" ... else wise with out intellectual thought you would simply be a vegetable.. assuming your not a vegetable then you are very obviously unaware of the contradiction that you posing ..
p: > it truly is a sad thing to condemn the only thing that separates man from the beasts and vegetables.. I feel truly sorry for you .. how you actually function in society it almost beyond my comprehension..
rk: There is no question that I actually function in society beyond your limited comprehension. Isn't that a natural outcome of a relationship between the spiritually sighted and the spiritually blind?
rk: You're feeling sorry for the wrong guy. It is you who remain blind to the Truth which lies right under your nose. You evidence such by your emotional reaction. You just need to blow off steam because your remain blind to the Truth expressed in my writing.
rk: I suspect you have not read much of my admittedly voluminous writings on my Website http://www.arkenterprises.com . It is there where I reveal the rightful place for the use of the Intellect in this Satanically ruled world.
rk: It seems that you, just as thousands of others who are thoroughly confused to the core of their being and live their conflicted lives as the satanically conditioned Legion of "Living Dead", react to and are stopped cold at the manipulation of the superficial level of the "Satanic" LETTER of words,
rk: Modern day Pharisees, (judges and lawyers) are expert at deception and manipulation of the Letter of the Word in the minds of undiscerning Jurors who've been conditioned to doubt themselves and worship authority.
rk: What is missing in them, and in you, is their/your God-given ability to access their deeply buried Divine Awareness of the SPIRIT of the word which remains, overburdened with satanically-conditioned thought.
rk: Its called IGNORANCE. It is the nature of an enslaved populace. Take a good look at yourself and the others with whom you relate. Your collective, conditioned consciousness is not unlike the enslaved reactionary munchkins in the Wizard of Oz.
rk: Hell, isn't It??
rk: Sorry to be so abrupt, but the ever-advancing Martial Law and Destruction of our Constitutional Republic does now allow for any more pussyfooting around.
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Letter to the Editor Comments
Illinois Valley News
The War on Drugs is a joke. It is a "make do" effort on the part of the Justice/Police/Prison System to frighten the public and create busy work and more jobs for the Enforcement Industry..
The rhetoric hasn't changed a bit since I was a Police Sergeant in the San Francisco Bay Area in the 1960's, the days of "Haight-Ashbury."
There is a sickness in our land. It is not due to drugs, but to public ignorance. The average man/woman/child has been inundated with drug propaganda by government/media sources for a lifetime, the problem grows. Ever ask yourselves why?
The answers are all around you. Your public servant government has donned the mantle of master over "bought and paid for" slaves/human resources. They have stolen your birthright. They have made a joke of our Unalienable Rights. They have made many of you "criminals" merely by attending to that class of people who are unable to stand up to the stresses and problems of manufactured government problems.
In the process, Americans have been dehumanized. They have lost their grip on their own God-given Sovereignty and are now floundering about, like a ship without a rudder, wondering what happened to their lives, their homes, their jobs, their children, their money, their freedom.
All the evidence of the shift in consciousness was there for all to see as our culture began to shift and reshapen itself to the present illusion. We are now at the nadir of the cycle and are about to lose it all. Why? Because of the average individual's blindness does not allow them to see the disastrous unfoldment of events happening before their very eyes.
I don't want to lecture you. I doubt that it would do any good anyway. I doubt if most of you could even admit to yourselves that you are so blind to how the state of the world, your world got that way. It got that way by your silence, by your doubts, by your fears. by your capitulation to the illusion of authority.
Ponder this: The government works for you, not you for them. You are the Sovereign, Government is the servant. If you want to glimpse what one man can do standing up to a Josephine County tyrannical court and Justice system, I invite you to visit my website political page at http://www.arkenterprises.com/index11.html
After reading it, and comprehending the significance of it, then I suggest you locate your backbone and act by demanding your government respond to the word of the Sovereign People. Otherwise you can kiss your lives goodbye.
Raymond Ronald Karczewski ©