rick@okelley.org IP: 12.14.232.44 wrote:

posted 06-29-2001 03:40 PM

Traffic courts are for the most part the vehicle local government uses to extract forced tax revenue from citizens. The deck is stacked against a defendant, police rarely have to do anything other than show up and testify to obtain a conviction and a order to pay and the city becomes just that much richer. In many cities, the funds that pay the judge and the officer come from those fees so there is no incentative for justice, it is a corrupting process.

If money were removed from this equation and the local government courts were not permitted to enter judgements that required the payment of money then we would see these courts dry up and blow away and a great number of small police departments would be shutdown and their duties once again the responsibility of the local sheriff.

We need to return to the old days, when a person committed a minor offense the were put in the stocks on the court house lawn for a day. It would have two effects, one there would be great respect for the law and we would probably see a great number of laws repealed as a result, and two, we would see city governments having to look elsewhere for the revenue they now take from those who commit minor infractions, many infractions which shouldn't be illegal infractions at all.

We have too many laws, too many police officers, and to many courts.

AllanHampton IP: 208.180.184.148 wrote:

posted 06-29-2001 03:30 PM

Ray, I agree with you but feel you will lose because the cards are stacked against you.

"The proceedings in Judge Roberts' Justice Court were less that of a Judicial Court and more that of a bureaucratically run collection agency."

Admiralty Courts are the Kings courts to rob the people and was well understood by our Founding Fathers. The King in your case is government. By any stretch of the imagination a traffic court being an Admiralty Court is unconstitutional. But, who pays any attention to the Constitution today? Not the citizenry, and especially not those elected to public office.

If it ain't already too late we best try to get some help to vote third, fourth, fifth party come November 2002. In the meantime help ratify TC2K.

Me: IP: 206.11.234.102 wrote:

posted 06-29-2001 03:24 PM

You wasted your time trying to prove a point. You should have just moved to dismiss on the grounds that the state had no witness(6th Amendment defense) and not submitted the weak jurisdictional defense. As it was, you admitted guilt in your "defense", thus waiving your fifth and sixth amendment rights, so if your jurisdictional argument was dismissed (and it should have been - it is VERY weak) you were still on the record as admitting guilt. Therefore, the presence of the officer was no longer necessary.

As far as your "defense" goes, admiralty law applies only on the navigable waterways, and has NEVER applied to land travel.

Second, the Judge does not have to prove anything under the rules of procedure in any US court system. He/She is responsible for ruling on points of law, and on the evidence if no jury is present. By stating that she believed she had jurisdiction, she was ruling that, by stare decis (and probably statute), the issue was settled and that jurisdiction over these types of offenses belonged in her court. Pretty much anyone else would agree, hence all you managed to do was alienate the judge and ensure that she would note that you had voluntarily, in your "defense", incriminated yourself.

Reply

"Me": IP: 206.11.234.102 wrote:

Raymond Karczewski (arkent@arkenterprises.com) wrote:

posted 06-29-2001 03:24 PM

m: You wasted your time trying to prove a point.

rk: You are inferring that I, as a law abiding citizen, had a choice? Does not being summoned to court under threat of arrest to answer trumped-up (unconstitutional) charges require the "proving" of point(s)?

m: You should have just moved to dismiss on the grounds that the state had no witness(6th Amendment defense) and not submitted the weak jurisdictional defense.

rk: Why would any freedom loving American choose to weasel out of their responsibility in holding an errant government responsible for its departure from the U.S. Constitution? Ignorance? Fear? Apathy? No sir.

rk: The real issue at the core of this matter -- which must be examined and adjudicated, even taken to the US Supreme Court if necessary -- is the growing body of "criminal, unconstitutional, color of office" regulations which have been incrementally imposed upon a populace through "unauthorized custom" via an extended "mind control, politically correct conditioning campaign," thereby creating and establishing a pseudo-jurisdiction capable of exploiting an unwary public.

rk: It is merely one example of the TRANSFERENCE (Redistribution) OF WEALTH -- a process which *takes from* those who are ignorant of their own sovereignty as human beings, who have put their blind trust in others they have placed into positions of power/authority and *gives to* those who make and enforce the rules. It is this fundamental flaw in the fragmented consciousness of a Satanically-ruled Intellect of civilized man that has made this planet a HELL ON EARTH.

rk: Admiralty-Maritime law is civil law. It has NO JURISDICTION in the realm of Common Law/Constitutional Law.

rk: That is the issue now before the court.

m: As it was, you admitted guilt in your "defense", thus waiving your fifth and sixth amendment rights, so if your jurisdictional argument was dismissed (and it should have been - it is VERY weak) you were still on the record as admitting guilt. Therefore, the presence of the officer was no longer necessary.

rk: If Admiralty-Maritime law courts are bound by any of the Constitutional Amendments (as in the example you give of one's waiving their fifth and sixth amendment rights), they are bound to ALL of the tenets of the US Constitution, are they not? It, the Maritime Court, cannot pick and choose which Constitutional Rights will be recognized and which will not.

rk: As such, the issue before the Canyonville Justice Court and Douglas County Law Enforcement officials who unlawfully and Unconstitutionally exercise their "police powers" against *free and natural persons* who assert their "unalienable Right to Liberty," guaranteed US Citizens by the US Constitution, remains one of JURISDICTION, JURISDICTION, JURISDICTION.

rk: The Douglas County Court System, through its Satellite traffic court of Canyonville, a civil law court bound by the rules of Admiralty-Maritime law, has no JURISDICTION over matters of COMMON LAW, UNALIENABLE AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

m: As far as your "defense" goes, admiralty law applies only on the navigable waterways, and has NEVER applied to land travel.

rk: The courts disagree with you. They have previously stated Admiralty-Maritime courts have jurisdiction over contracts, torts, and other special cases. Waring v. Clark, 5 HOW 441m 454-464: Genesse Chief v. Fitzhugh, 12 HOW. 443. 454, United States v Flores, 289 U.S. 137, 154. (1933)

rk; The simple fact is that no contract existed between myself and the State of Oregon for a Driver's License. Neither can the State compel a citizen to waive his Unalienable/Constitutional Rights and cause him to enter into a contract which allows such Rights to be converted into Privilege. The State does not have the power to convert the individual's right to travel upon the public roads into a "privilege."

rk: I had challenged the Admiralty-Maritime law-based traffic court's jurisdiction which violates my Unalienable Right to Liberty which includes the right to travel in the "normal and usual conveyance of the day"; i.e., the private automobile, to wit:

rk: "Personal liberty largely consists of the Right of locomotion -- to go where and when one pleases - - only so far restrained as the Rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but the common Right which he has under his Right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this Constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's Rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct." [emphasis added] II Am.Jur. (1st) Constitutional Law, Sect.329, p.1135.

rk: Unalienable Rights are inarguable. These God-given rights cannot be abridged, infringed upon, surrendered, transferred, converted, or legislated out of existence, nor can they be converted into privilege, as in the issue now before the court.

m: Second, the Judge does not have to prove anything under the rules of procedure in any US court system.

rk: That seems to fly in the face of HAGENS vs LAVINE, 15 US. 533m N-3, which states that "once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven."

m: He/She is responsible for ruling on points of law, and on the evidence if no jury is present. By stating that she believed she had jurisdiction, she was ruling that, by stare decis (and probably statute), the issue was settled and that jurisdiction over these types of offenses belonged in her court.

rk: Legal Definition: "stare decisis" ['ster-e-di-'si-sis, 'stär-e-; 'stä-ra-da-'ke-ses] New Latin, to stand by things that have been settled: the doctrine under which courts adhere to precedent on questions of law in order to insure certainty, consistency, and stability in the administration of justice with departure from precedent permitted for compelling reasons (as to prevent the perpetuation of injustice)

rk: See above comments about "unauthorized custom"

m: Pretty much anyone else would agree, hence all you managed to do was alienate the judge and ensure that she would note that you had voluntarily, in your "defense", incriminated yourself.

rk: Alienate the judge by questioning the unlawful procedures unfolding in our court system? To do less is no more than fearful capitulation to those who make the rules as they go along and hence, win the game. It is that mindset of a conditioned populace that allows for tyranny to grow in a land once free.

rk: What is interesting are the comments which arise to this issue. Take the time to read them. You will see the "broken spirit" of cowards who must rationalize their cowardice in the face of Tyranny.

rk: I care less what others may do in the circumstances I now find myself. To me the "way" is clear and unobstructed. I am 63 years old. I cannot, and could not improve upon my life, for throughout it I have been guided by the holistic Spirit (holy) of Divine Intelligence (not to be confused with intellectualism). Such intelligence can only function in the nondualistic realm of consciousness which resonates in Freedom and Liberty.

rk: We shall see what the future holds for a country made up of such diverse levels of Intelligence, won't we?

The following libelous attacks arise from the keyboards of assorted anonymous government/media disinformation agents who, through disruption, intimidation, and character assassination control the flow of information on public Usenet Newsgroups/Forums

Your thrashing around desperately is painful to watch

Re: A Rush to Judgment: Citizens, US Constitution and Justice (Raymond Karczewski)

Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:10:48 GMT

From: It's your arrogance stupid (unknown)

Your own utterly ignorance and arrogance did you in, and even now once the proper strategy is explained to you, you cannot understand it because you're so blinded by your own mental illness. No lawyer can help someone like you. If you want top change the law, go back to harrassing Gordon Smith and Ron Wyden.

O wait: they have already made clear enough the fact they too consider you a joke.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You despicable narcissist: yes, you had a choice

Re: A Rush to Judgment: Citizens, US Constitution and Justice (Raymond Karczewski)

Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:42:25 GMT

From: You always have a choice you old fool (unknown)

You could have simply acted like a minimally intelligent, adult human being, briefly demonstrated you could be trusted driving a motor vehicle, and received the necessary licence. All this would have been avoided if you had done the socially responsible, right thing. Instead you let your narcissism run away with you -- again -- and now you'll have to pay $700 dollars because you tried to get away with acting like a spoiled child. Why does this very simple fact so elude your...what shall I call your lack of critical skills? This is not rocket science. Grow up you old fool.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You won't be taking a traffic ticket to theSupremeCourt

Re: A Rush to Judgment: Citizens, US Constitution and Justice (Raymond Karczewski)

Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:48:34 GMT

From: Out of your mind or really good drugs? (unknown)

rk: The real issue at the core of this matter -- which must be examined and adjudicated, even taken to the US Supreme Court if necessary

Ray you really are waaaaaay too self-absorbed. Where did you get the idea the Supreme Court would ever take a traffic ticket dispute on cert? Are you out of your mind or on really, really good drugs?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The man's right.

Re: A Rush to Judgment: Citizens, US Constitution and Justice (Raymond Karczewski)

Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:52:11 GMT

From: Your own character flaws undid you here (unknown)

Arguing the court's jurisdiction is the weakest thing you could have possibly done. If you had done any research at all, even in laymen's terms, you would have understood this and abandoned the doomed tactic. It's your own strange, short-circuiting inability to accept the simple fact you're wrong that will undo you in the end. As is right I suppose. Justice works in mysterious ways.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This has nothing to do with Christ

Re: Travelers and Cops: An Oregon Story (Raymond Karczewski)

Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 16:09:08 GMT

From: Your arrogance and violence are evil (unknown)

This is the unmitigated mental illness of someone eaten away by hatred for humanity. I am sorry for you Raymond that your life has turned out to be such a waste, and your only response to that waste of a human life is to hate people who are more intelligent, loved, and wise than you could ever hope to be. Work on fixing your own diseased soul before reflexively attacking those who disagree with your appraisal of yourself as God. Sickness such as you suffer can only he healed from within. You will die the desperate, wretched little man you are unless you find the moral character to recognize how evil your arrogant and violent behavior towards other has been for so many years.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Pseudo-legal claptrap

Re: A Rush to Judgment: Citizens, Constitution, and Justice (RaymondKarczewski)

Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 10:16:21 GMT

From: Shut up you babbling psychotic kook (unknown)

You're just irate that you killed your own case because you don't know that first thing about the law. Screaming like a three-year-old child having a tantrum only shows your absolute lack of character and intelligence. Take responsibility for yourself and your own wrong actions. And above all, shove your disgusting screeds and threats. You're lucky you got away with your history of domestic violence. You should have been thrown in jail decades ago. You can't go around endangering lives on the road, period you psycho.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The right to travel is NOT the right to drive

Re: Pseudo-legal claptrap (Shut up you babbling psychotic kook)

Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 10:21:39 GMT

From: Get basically informed before you attack (unknown)

Take a basic course in Constitutional law why don't you? The right to travel refers to the right to relocate to other states and live there. This is what sunk Oregon in your case. Without this right, disease like you and Anita could not have come here to leech off taxpayers in Oregon, but would have had to stay in California to leech off them instead. It has nothing to do with driving. Get minimally informed before you attack more. You are a real, ignorant a**hole Ray.

Reply

Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:18:15 -0400 (EDT)

Raymond Karczewski (arkent@arkenterprises.com) wrote:

"\"george\" <"(me@here.com) wrote:

g: You stated that you were a retired police officer.....if that is true, I wonder how many innocent people you stepped on the ground your heels into....

g: When I lived in Oregon, I was hit in the rear while wating at a red light by a drunk plain clothed police officer...He then got out of his car , drew his gun and was going to "Blow us away,(my passenger and I). Luckily there was another police officer close by when the incedent occured and was able to stop him.

g: To make a long story short, after the police finished their "investigation", I lost my car, my driving licence, and was fined $500.00 for having the pleasure of being ran into by a drunken cop.......

g: I dared to try and bring the truth out, but, you know how police are...guilty untill the cops can frame you....then there is the harrassment that occurs after one tries to defend them selves from a crooked cop...All the so-called good cops line up behind the worthless cop and lie to protect him.......

g: I have no sympathy for you...If your a bad cop, you have probably screwed many people over....if your a "good" cop, you have in all likelyhood supported the bad cops and continued to do so.....

g: This is one of the major reasons that most of the people I know do not care for cops, even though they talk to them as friends, they are wishing the self-aborbed, egotistical, SOB would get lost................

rk: George, I agree with you. There is nothing worse than a drunken bully cop, in or out of uniform.

rk: I'm sorry you had to endure what you did. It is this type of lawless government behavior, preying upon citizens, that is behind my present challenge to an errant government which no longer hides behind glossy PR images, but has now ratcheted up its tyrannical policies to an unprecedented "IN YOUR FACE" level of intimidation and provocation. We WILL LOSE our country if the American People do not wake up soon and assert their power as Sovereign Human Beings.

rk: We live in a Country of some 280-plus million people. That, my friend (for you are not my enemy), is the power that no aspiring world-governing elitists, no cadre of International bankers, no Federal, State, County or Local government can stand up to.

rk: The power to change our society does not lie in organized numbers. That has been proven over and over again throughout history -- but the spiritually sightless still remain blind to that simple fact.

rk: The power to change comes from within. Change yourself first, and the world will change with you. That, George, is not a glib empty assertion. THAT IS TRUTH. The actions of a sovereign citizen standing alone in the light of Truth have more power than all the governments on this earth that carry out their Machiavellian power agendas behind the secrecy of closed doors.

rk: As you may have noticed, I publish, in detail, all of my personal government interactions on the Internet for all the world to see. That type of openness places ALL participants equally in a state of accountability. It is the only equalizer capable of disarming corrupt bureaucrats. The power of the bureaucrat is an illusion. When brought out from behind the closed doors of the rigidly controlled environment bureaucrat policy makers have constructed for themselves, power disintegrates when exposed by the Light of Truth.

rk: If the people only understood this, our world would change in an eternal "blink of an eye."

rk: All have power over their own destiny. Few understand it. The multitudes do not. Through mind control/conditioning, they have been reduced to codependent slaves in search of security and peace. Few find the security and peace they seek, for they are conditioned to look for it in the wrong place.

rk: My presence on the Internet over the last 6 years has been to demonstrate to slave-minded individuals what a "sovereign" human being looks like. See for yourself the Hell that has been raised when one such person is observed in contrast to his hellish civilized environment.

rk: Do you want peace in your life? Do you want the security that understanding brings? Then ponder this: BE WHOLE, BE COMPLETE. From this moment forward, LIVE IN THE LIGHT OF TRUTH.

rk: Do not lie, cheat, steal, exploit, or INITIATE harm to another -- then SCREW THE RULES!! Do that and you will see for yourself the difference of energy between the HOLISTIC essence of GOD'S LAW and of man's Satanically directed, intellectual, letter-of-the-word-based law.

rk: Do that, George, and you will understand the meaning of the CHRIST STATE of conciousness. It has never been the purview of just one Man. It is the True Estate of ALL MEN.

rk: It is time for us to change our country.

rk: It is time for us to return it to its Constitutional foundation.

rk: It is time for us to send the United Nations packing from American soil.

rk: It is time for us to say HELL NO WE WON'T GO to the New World Order.

rk: It does not take organization to do it. It only takes individuals who have the "courage" to stand up for their Unalienable Rights.

rk: Do that, George, and your chances of having some bully cop threatening to blow you away is slim to none!

Reply

AllanHampton IP: 208.180.184.148 wrote:

posted 07-01-2001 05:47 AM

Raymond Karczewski (arkent@arkenterprises.com) wrote:

ah: Ray, in your ranting a raving you are posting conflicting and opposite views in the same post.

rk: What rant? What rave? Did my comments override your conditioned "comfort zone?"

ah: You are making a sad misleading mistake, as most supposedly Christians do, in trying to mix religious, spirituality, or superstition into our duties of citizenship.

rk: That, Allan, is the conditioned mind set ("if you want to have friends, do not discuss politics or religion or mix the two together") which has successfully kept people fragmented, divided, and ignorant since the dawn of civilization and thereby renders them controllable by the "few" who rule the "many." It blocks the human being from going beyond the conditioned limitation of his Satanically (Opposer) ruled, programmable intellect, which is necessary for technical problem solving but absolutely destructive when used to solve problems arising in the non-technical areas; i.e., LIFE ITSELF.

rk: I am not a Christian. I am a Christ (not to be confused with the myth arising from Christian Conditioning).

ah: We, the People, have only three "powers" with which to control the elected (government) and they are: the Vote, Jury Duty, and the Gun.

rk: The "vote, jury duty and gun, eh? Such narrowness! What about using the power of BOYCOTT? How about withholding one's symbol of energy, one's money, from parasitical manipulators who exploit the energies of the producers and "use it against them"? When dutiful citizens look at the world through such "blinders," is it any wonder the world is in the shape that it's in? Rather narrow and inappropriate parameters to employ for non-technical problem solving, wouldn't you say?

rk: For example, we already know that the Vote system is a fraud.

rk: The Jury System doesn't work. It is a mind control experiment conducted in a controlled psychological environment wherein the same facts are twisted, turned and obfuscated by clever wordtwisters until confusion and/or boredom reigns supreme in the confused intellects of 12 gullible, suggestible men/women. The confusion is complete when it is ultimately capped off with legal mumbo-jumbo instructions they do not understand from a black robed man. That, Allan, is the essence of man's law. Life, death, freedom and power hang in the balance of such a flawed system. Nuts, isn't it?

ah: Religion, spirituality, superstition, God(s) nor angels will perform our duties of citizenship for us.

rk: Allan, in expressing the conditioned views you have in this post, you only reveal your present narrow level of consciousness (as do many, many others who are equally as ignorant of their true selves.) You take such pride in announcing the conditioned fragment which rules the intellect of the entity named Allan. That, sir, is what is understood by the "spiritually sighted" as an "unhealthy ego."

rk: First understand what it is to be a *whole* human being. Allow the Spirit of intelligence to unlock its prison cell of Intellect and take its rightful estate as the essence of the Infinite. Then you will come to see the narrowness of belief which accompanies that of being a "dutiful citizen."

Reply

Sun Jul 1 10:07:59 2001

Grugyn Silverbristle writes:

Ray,

It is a sad commentary, nonetheless true, that there is no justice in law, only legal outcomes. When one confronts the Beast in its Court, his eye must be on the outcome. Was it your objective to reveal the evil nature of the Beast? In that you have succeeded. I learned, too, the hard way. But if you were seeking a favorable legal outcome, you know as well as I, that the case needs to be "fixed" before it is docketed for Court. This should serve as a notice to all Patriots who contemplate legal confrontations ... such things are best staged by first placing friendly judges on the bench -- which takes us back to the political coup. That is how our enemies have done it. The stage must be set before we act upon it.

Your stand was a noble attempt, Ray, and your posting is exceptional because, uncharacteristically, it is intelligible. Good work. Best I've seen from you. Hope the penalties are not too severe and that you can get a new drivers' license without having to kiss the judge's arse. If Mexicans can do it, hopefully, so can you.

God bless you and keep you strong. "Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil." Remember to wear your seat belts, too; and in New York, be careful about using your cell phone while driving. Amen.

Reply

"Me"IP: 206.11.234.102 wrote:

Raymond Karczewski (arkent@arkenterprises.com) wrote:

posted 07-01-2001 12:20 PM

m: > Your argument reminds me of a kid, accused of copying a homework assignment off of another, protests that the assignment was too hard for a fifth grader to do without cheating, instead of pointing out that the answers are different on his paper as compared to the student he was accused of copying off of. It was dumb, pure and simple.

rk: That's quite a left field misdirection. If you think not, how about supporting such an irrelevant generality with some substantive evidence to back up that obfuscation? If you are talking about the cut and pasting of actual legal citations to support the argument, is this not what lawyers do when filing a legal brief? Is this not the basis of the legal tradition based on Stare Decisis?

"rk: >> The Douglas County Court System, through its Satellite traffic court of Canyonville, a civil law court bound by the rules of Admiralty-Maritime law, has no JURISDICTION over matters of COMMON LAW, UNALIENABLE AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS."

m: > It does have jurisdiction over traffic violations

rk: Indeed it does. Under the State's Police Powers, such jurisdiction does exist over those who drive and use their "motor vehicles" on the public roadways for *commercial or business* purposes. Such jurisdiction also applies to the gullible, hoodwinked, and ignorant (for 46 years, I was one of them) who waive their Rights when such terms are accepted and agreed to in contracting with the State for the privilege of securing a Driver's License.

rk: Common Law states that unless there is actual damage, harm, or infringement upon another's rights when a citizen exercising his Unalienable Right to Liberty is travelling in his/her private automobile for private purposes, his/her right to travel in a lawful (note: infractions are not laws), orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's Rights, HE WILL BE PROTECTED, NOT ONLY IN HIS PERSON, BUT IN HIS SAFE CONDUCT" to wit:

"Personal liberty largely consists of the Right of locomotion -- to go where and when one pleases -- only so far restrained as the Rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horsedrawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but the common Right which he has under his Right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this Constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's Rights, HE WILL BE PROTECTED, NOT ONLY IN HIS PERSON, BUT IN HIS SAFE CONDUCT." (My emphasis rk) II Am.Jur. (1st) Constitutional Law, Sect.329, p.1135.

m: > and other such matters delegated by the Constitution and statutes of Oregon, under the general police powers of the state. A traffic court is merely a court of limited jurisdiction,

rk: Yes indeed! Once again I agree with the statement you make, but not to the conclusion you derive from it; i.e., " A traffic court is merely a court of limited jurisdiction. . ." Such limitedness excludes and therefore has no jurisdiction over the person who asserts such all encompassing Unalienable and Constitutional Rights unless they are waived.

rk: Unalienable Rights are inarguable. These God-given rights cannot be abridged, infringed upon, surrendered, transferred, converted, or legislated out of existence; nor can they be converted into privilege.

rk: I repeat: UNALIENABLE RIGHTS ARE INARGUABLE. THESE GOD-GIVEN RIGHTS CANNOT BE ABRIDGED, INFRINGED UPON, SURRENDERED, TRANSFERRED, CONVERTED, OR LEGISLATED OUT OF EXISTENCE; NOR CAN THEY BE CONVERTED INTO PRIVILEGE!!

rk: Do you GET IT NOW?!!

m: > analagous to the Article I courts , allowed under the last paragraph of Section 8. I would hazard to guess that Oregon specifically allows jurisdiction over such offenses as you clearly admitted to to be heard in such a court, rendering your jurisdictional argument moot.

rk: Ah! but ONLY if I had entered into a contract with the State of Oregon, thereby waiving my Unalienable/Constitutional Rights.

m: > BTW, since the Federal Constitution does not specifically delegate jurisdiction over licensing drivers to the Federal government, I suppose under AllanHampton's definition, this is a purely state matter, anyway.

rk: The State cannot supercede the U.S. Constitution in this matter unless it comes under the Police Powers clause which regulates motor vehicles using the public roadways while engaging in Commercial/Business activities and/or those who have waived their Unalienable/Constitutional Rights via entering into a contract with the State.

rk: >> The courts disagree with you. They have previously stated Admiralty-Maritime courts have jurisdiction over contracts, torts, and other special cases. Waring v. Clark, 5 HOW 441m 454-464: Genesse Chief v. Fitzhugh, 12 HOW. 443. 454, United States v Flores, 289 U.S. 137, 154. (1933) "

m: > I notice this case isn't a contract or tort case, btw.

rk: Of course it is a matter of contract law! Try to get a Driver's license without first affixing your signature to the "dotted line on the application." With that deft and swift motion of the pen, one enters into a binding contract with the State and agrees to waive his Unalienable/Constitutional Rights in the process.

rk: By the way "me" you sound like a typical, obfuscating, misdirecting lawyer. Are you, in fact, a lawyer, or do you only play one on the Internet? Are you one of "them thar" government/media disinformation agents who prowl these USENET newsgroups/forums? Never mind, you needn't answer the question. Most already understand that Truth plays a very small part indeed in a slick-talking lawyer's bag of tricks and almost no part in the bag of tricks of professional disinformation agents.

m: > You are trying to make a clearly invalid argument, for which there is ample statutory and case law precedent to support the state, merely to make a statement that you don't like state regulation of driver's liceenses.

rk: Sorry, that dog won't hunt!! Do you not tire of such misdirections?

m: As a result of your stubborn thick-headedness, you threw away a chance to win on a valid point of law (no witness),

rk: Once again, I repeat, it is not my intention to use such petty lawyer tricks in order to get the charges dismissed. My intention is to bring out into the Light of Truth the corruptness of a government which would perpetrate such a "massive construction fraud" upon the American public by witholding information from the Contractee that "...they have a perfect right to use the roads without any permission..."

rk: "The following exerpt was taken from a legal brief used in at least three states (Pennsylvania, Ohio, and West Virginia) to support a demand for dismissal of charges of "driving without a license." It is the argument that was the reason for charges being dropped, or for a "win" in court against the argument that free people can have their right to travel regulated by their servants."

rk: Beginning of excerpt: "Since no notice is given to people applying for driver's (or other) licenses that they have a perfect right to use the roads without any permission, and that they surrender valuable rights by taking on the regulation system of licensure, the state has committed a massive construction fraud. This occurs when any person is told that they must have a license in order to use the public roads and highways."

rk: "The license, being a legal contract under which the state is empowered with policing powers is only valid when the licensee takes on the burdens of the contract and bargains away his or her rights knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily."

rk: "Few know that the driver's license is a contract without which the police are powerless to regulate the people's actions or activities."

rk: "Few if any licensees intentionally surrender valuable rights. They are told that they must have the license. As we have seen, this is not the case."

rk: "No one in their right mind voluntarily surrenders complete liberty and accepts in its place a set of regulations."

rk: "The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion. Edmund Burke, 1784." End of excerpt.

rk: Amen!!

m: and pissed the judge off in such a manner that you cannot expect to gain the benefit of leniency from discretion. You have basically been "cutting off your nose to spite your face", and it is hard to sympathize with you.

rk: Or else one has not sought to grovel, nor bow and scrape before an illusory "master," but has instead stood up as a Sovereign Human Being shielded by the full protection of his TRUTH and Unalienable/Constitutional Rights.

rk: It points to the difference between a sovereign freeman and a capitulating slave, doesn't it?

Reply

Raymond Karczewski (arkent@arkenterprises.com) wrote:

John wrote:

Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 19:54:37

rk: Following is a brief dialogue I had with another several years ago. Why repost it? Because if you look deeply into this very human issue of relationship, you will recognize the seeds of of fear, codependence. and conflict implanted in the consciousness of the gullible and the psychologically malleable now responsible for this country's present unrest.

rk: It is time to Americans to wake up, discover their backbone, and question, question, question!!!

j: > Dear Folks:

j: > Good evening. Here is a couple of issues that I need your help on. Please reply with any suggestions or "solutions":

j: > 1. How does one deal with dogmas and traditions with other fellow friends and family members?

rk: Open, loving, and Truthfully!

rk: Let the mirror of truth function without the interpretive intellect getting in the way. You'll find it quite efficient when you allow the energy of the moment to tell the story, rather than utilizing memory based intellects to respond to living moments with dead solutions.

j: > For a example there is a person X and his wife Y (or vice versa). X always looks at things with a questioning mind even at things that are considered "sacred" by customs and family traditions. X does not mind following them to keep people around him satisfied but he is discontented that the people close to him (including Y) just follow the customs blindly. When X wants to understand the root of this and discusses with Y(his wife) Y would always answer as follows: " Well we have to respect the elders. They had respected their elders. Why think about so many issues. It would be a simple matter if we just followed the ancient customs. Everthing has been thought about by the ancestors." X says "Well we do not even make an attempt to read the original scriptures, where the logic behind the acts could have been laid down. Why do we have to follow some man made methods and procedures?". This sort of conversation goes on and on...

rk: Have you not by your delineation of the problem also given yourself the answer. Look at the quality of energy exhibited. X is alive, vibrant, moving, curious. Y is inert, dead, traditional, reactionary, fearful of disruption. Y manifests the energy of one highly subject to her conditionings.

rk: An holistic view of the fragmented question always supplies its solution if it is observed quietly. It would seem that such exagerrated energies (X and Y) are together for the express purpose of spiritual growth as tested by the crucible of relationship. j: > Please reply your thoughts on this.

J; > 2. The second issue is education of a child. Is it okay if the child that is born in a family that is established in a particular religion, that he/she be made to follow religious customs so that he/she does not go astray in moral path later in life? There is a lot of conflict here. How could one discipline a child or is it wrong to discipline the child? What is education?

rk: One must ask him/herself, what relationship does organized religion have with Truth. The question must be answered not at the superficial linear level of one intellect to another, but by each of us deeply through direct perception-- insight. After all, is not the organized dogma of religion the very vehicle responsible for "sins of the "conditioned" parents being passed onto their children."

Reply

Tue Jul 3 12:49:31 2001

Jill Wrote:

Raymond Karczewski (arkent@arkenterprises.com) wrote:

j: I was an 80's latch key kid. My parents were both divorced and my mother was a single mom raising four kids.

rk: Tell your mom there's at least one Christ who commends her. Single parenting with four kids, holding down a job and keeping a household, holding it altogether, is a mighty test of integrity for any single parent, especially a single woman managing to navigate life in a corrupt patriarchal society. You are a reflection of that integrity. Congratulations!!

j: We didn't have it easy at all. I helped to care for my three younger siblings as well as help my mother out with work and such.

rk: Life's circumstances do not dictate whether one lives in poverty. Attitude is the source of all impoverishment.

j: I am now a 21 year old college graduate working for IBM. As far as I am concerned the only people to blame for kids being ignorant these days is the kids themeselves.

rk: We are all responsible for OURSELVES, for we are the "cocreators" of our lives (you already know who the other Creator is).

rk: It is the God-given gift of AWARENESS which dictates whether one lives life on this planet in Intelligence or Ignorance. Psychological conditioning destroys Awareness and is the culprit responsible for the autoresponsiveness of automatons; i.e., the "Living Dead." It is that simple step away from awareness that is responsible for civilized men/women who have fallen from grace into the abyss of their own illusory, intellectually-constructed Hell.

j: I was raised in the worst possible situation in absolute poverty (can anyone say four sets of clothes to my name till I turned 16 and got a job!) The reason that things are as bad as they are now is that the current generations are giving up.

rk: One must not look at merely a fragment but at the whole of society if understanding is to manifest in consciousness. Our world is in crisis at the present time. I have been writing about it on and off the Internet for the last six years. Much talk about militias and revolutions abound and is accelerating in intensity. Such is the frustration and nature of the confused and impotent. Such talk is mere evidence of procrastination arising from those who CANNOT ACT NOW, in the moment.

rk: All solutions to problems are to be found in action, not in the *idea* of action to be taken at some future time. The solution is a shift of consciousness from the fragment to the whole. When the whole is observed, there is no problem.

rk: The intelligent are guided by the holistic (holy) Spirit of Divine Intelligence. Such holistic atonement with the Infinite energy of that which has been called "God" requires the disintegration of obstacles born of conditioning to die, to end, to lose their power over the consciousness held captive by a "politically/religiously correct thinking" consciousness. In that moment of silence the "Resurrection of the Spirit" born of holistic intelligence emerges. That is the return to the Christ State (infinite, unbounded state of Intelligence). All men/women who live their lives in the fragmented Hell of their own making are IGNORANT of that simple Truth.

j: They are giving up on everything. From being responsible for themselves and their actions to believing in God. These kids have had plenty of opportunities to turn themselves around, countless friends, teachers and other acquaintences along their paths of life have offered a helping hand only to have it bitten off and spit in their faces. The only people to blame for this is the people doing the biting.

rk: BEWARE of helping hands from conditioned ignoramuses. Is that not tantamount to the "blind leading the blind?" Has it not been said that "the road to hell is paved with good intentions?"

rk: Hypocrisy is the bottom-line dualistic state of consciousness which rules conditioned civilized beings. For one to see the Truth of that statement for themselves, one has only to look at the present state of the civilized world.

rk: The "inner" state of consciousness is always manifested as the "outer" state of society. Confusion inwardly = outward confusion. Violence inwardly = outward violence. Dualistic divisions inwardly = outward competition and exploitation leading to the redistribution of energy; i.e., wealth. Fragmentation inwardly = Master/Slave relationship outwardly. Is that not the state of our present day society?

rk: Most who while away their lives until death becomes their only release from their Hellish existence are unaware of their ACTUAL status as MINIONS of Hell. Regardless of the religious cloaks they don to fuel the hypocrisy which rages within their tortured dualistic consciousness, they are IGNORANT of the fact that they, in fact, worship the false "god" of Intellect, a peripheral level of partial consciousness which is ruled by SATAN (the Opposer), the petty god of dualism. Look at it simply. Do not rail at the words. See how the MANY have been ruled by the FEW since the earliest of societies. It's all done through the esoteric secrets of SATANIC mind control.

j: Somewhere, sometime along the way they decided it was easier to let let everyone else be responsible for them instead of taking control of thier own lives.

rk: Their holistic spirit has been broken, fragmented into multiple compartments. They remain trapped in the prison cell of intellect. They remain codependent children who dream of adulthood, but cannot transcend their limited compartment of consciousness. Physical age has no bearing on such consciousness. Most go to their graves as spiritual children, not ever learning the lesson life had to teach them. They have capitulated early in life to the pressures of an educational system which has a vested interest in creating and reinforcing the glitch of "self doubt" and subsequent capitulation to authority.

rk: Do not condemn them, Jill, for they have already condemned themselves. All one need do is speak the Truth, raise the Hell within them until the masks fall away, and let the "devil" take the hindmost.

j: I don't know who or what is exactly the contributing factor, but it seems to me that far too often we look for an outside force to blame and not at the kids themselves. THEY DO KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG. THEY DO KNOW THE RIGHT PATHS TO SALVATION FOR BOTH THEMSELVES AND THEIR OWN SOULS AND THEY CHOOSE TO IGNORE IT!

rk: Jill, I understand your intentions are well meant, but step beyond, transcend the limiting illusory boundaries of a judgmental, dualistic Intellect and then tell us -- WHERE IS RIGHT AND WRONG?

j: For that, there is nothing we can do, but stand by and wait for all this to be over and for the coming of Jesus Christ to whisk us away to that castle in the sky!

rk: Jill, I can only relegate that comment to "Almost, but NO CIGAR!!"

j: I get so tired of hearing that these kids don't know what they are doing and that it must be their parents, schools, tv, music, video games, etc causing all the trouble for them. Wake up.

rk: The "Blame Game" is a mind control defense mechanism. It prevents one from delving deeper into one's consciousness to the level necessary to remove the self-imposed blocks to the Truth waiting patiently to manifest itself in the consciousness of that entity.

j: This is the generation that the anti christ is going to use against us.

rk: Only in a Satanically (Opposer/Dualism) ruled conditioned intellect which believes in the *idea* of Christ does the opposite *idea* of "anti christ" emerge. Jill, you have a great heart, good energy, yet you are not understanding the full impact of your comments. Contemplate upon the cautionary advice underlying the statement "Judge not lest Ye be Judged!"

j: I am a member of that generation, and so are countless other people my age. We had all the same games, music, etc. We all went to the same types of schools. Most of our parents are divorced. We never succumbed.

rk: All that can be said about that is "Some don't, Most Do." Yet the fly in the ointment remains to be that most ignorantly believe that they have not succumbed; yet, have in fact succumbed to the flowery, positive imaged seductions of a Satanic Intellect.

rk: For most who fall prey to such Satanic Intellectual plateaus of consciousness, all that can be said to them is that it is time for them to go "BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD!!"

j: Pray for your children and be ever vigilante people. Someone out there somewhere is planting these thoughs. Me thinks it to be Satan and in that case, unless your child resists it, such as I and many others, there is nothing you can do.

rk: Jill, here's a hint. RESIST NOT EVIL!!

rk: Resistance to anything always causes one to give up their own energy to support that which is resisted. BE quiet. Observe. Watch the reactions which arise within to the fragmentation (evil) you are observing outwardly. Understand a problem exists only because you are not able to observe the whole of it. When the whole is observed, UNDERSTANDING IS. Do not settle for counterfeit understanding which is based in CONDITIONED BELIEF. That is the Satanic seduction which rules the consciousness of Hell's minions.

God Bless you all!

Jill

rk: You are blessed!

Reply

realman69 wrote:

Raymond Karczewski (arkent@arkenterprises.com) wrote:

7/4/2001, 12:50 pm,

rm: Ray -

rm: Get real, demanding your employer to not withold taxes is asking him/her to commit a crime. What employer would go out of business for you sir?

rk: Perhaps you can come up with the law that says an employer must withhold taxes. You, sir, are subject to your own mind controlled psychological set insidiously and incrementally inculcated over a long period of time by government propaganda.Before you go off "half-cocked" again, you may want to read:

http://www.arrowplastics.com/withholding_statement.htm

and

http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/cafr1/CAFR.html

rm: You want a solution? Run for office. The local sheriff is a easy one to run for. You could simplify carry laws - a good beginning. Where I live - you can get a carry permit for a couple hundred dollars in fees so long as you hve a clean record. And, it's good for the entire state, once the county gives it to you. It's the sheriff that allows it.

rk: Ah! the slippery slope of government privilege, eh? You waive your Constitutional Right as guaranteed you by the Second Amendment when you "choose" to voluntarily enter into a contract with the State to secure a carry permit. You are then no longer under the protection of Constitution but have subjected yourself to the rule of Admiralty-Maritime Courts which have jurisdiction over contracts, torts, and other special cases. Waring v. Clark, 5 HOW 441m 454-464: Genesse Chief v. Fitzhugh, 12 HOW. 443. 454, United States v Flores, 289 U.S. 137, 154. (1933)

rk: Next time you enter a court, check to see whether the American Flag has yellow fringe. If it does,unless you are in the Military, you know you have just stepped into an Admiralty-Maritime court, and your US Constitution protections have just gone bye-bye!!!

rk: I wonder how many Citizens of the United States of America are aware of this fact of incremental encroachment upon their Constitutional Rights.

rk: Contract for a gun carry permit, and you will discover that you just had your *Rights* converted into a *Privilege.* Such privilege can then be revoked at any time with no recourse. Then where you? WATCH OUT FOR THAT SLIPPERY SLOPE you are about to step onto!!!!

rk: For more info on rights v. privilege, I invite you to read my current experiences with the State of Oregon over Unalienable Rights vs. Privilege (driver's licensing).

See http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialchst.htm

rm: Another solution - white your elected officials, city, county, state, and federal. If you want to feds to change their views - you've got to get the locals to change theirs first. And, the locals are the easiest to get changed. Anyone else got some reasonable ideas that a single person can work on?

rk: A better solution and one government is helpless to defend against is found my original post of this thread.

rk: The simple and most effective way for we as citizens to take back control of our country and our lives is to BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT, BOYCOTT!

rk: Without your tax money to use against you, how long do you think our errant government would be able to function in the way they now do?

rk: The simple answer is --THEY CAN'T!

rk: Another question worth asking is why are millions and millions of inert, fearful citizens posturing and boasting of their readiness to engage in a bloody revolution (when the time comes sometime in the future) instead of solving the problem NOW, in a bloodless way?

rk: I'll not give you the answer. It's too simple. To do so would only anger you by your believing your intelligence has been insulted.

rk: Americans are like the entranced "Munchkins" in the Wizard of Oz. When the spell of mind control was broken when the Wicked Witch of Mind Control disintegrated, they ALL WOKE UP to a New world.

rk: MUNCHKINS, ARISE!! AWAKEN FROM YOUR HYPNOTIC SLEEP. Only in a trance are you enslaved as dutiful MUNCHKINS. Wake up to the realization that you are and always have been United States of America citizens living in a nation once known as the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave!!!

Reply

Posted by realman69

Raymond Karczewski (arkent@arkenterprises.com) wrote:

7/4/2001, 12:57 pm,

rm: in reply to Ray -

rm: A short explaination of what the heck you're posting would be helpful.

rk: Sorry realman69, it's time Americans got serious and stopped relying upon slogans and soundbytes. (That's how you got conditioned in the first place.) Your request for a soundbyte of an issue that cuts to the very freedoms guaranteed us by our US Constitution will not be honored, at least not by me. GET SERIOUS OR GET ENSLAVED!!

rk: To grasp of what I am referring to you can read the following:

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch25.htm#Horse

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch23.htm#Highwaymen

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch24.htm#FBI

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch24.htm#CONFISCATION

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch24.htm#Oregon

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch25.htm#Privileges

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch25.htm#Dismiss

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch25.htm#Anatomy

rk: No one's gonna hand you back your Unalieanable/Constitutional on a silver platter. Pat answers don't bring understanding, they only "recondition" autoresponding automatons.

rm: I read through this post and still don't know where it came from, who it's about, when it happened, etc.....

rk: Its first hand, personal experience of yours truly.

rm: Please don't leave your readers in the dark.

rk: I just handed to you and others, the lantern which will light America's way back to freedom and sovereignty. Its up to you and the other to "ACTIVATE THE LANTERN" for yourselves.

The following libelous attacks arise from the keyboards of assorted anonymous government/media disinformation agents who, through disruption, misdirection, intimidation, and character assassination control the flow of information on public UsenetNewsgroups/Forums

Why Raymond Karczewski's the most sacred person ever born

Re: Town Square (New Admin)

Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 21:54:59 GMT

From: (unknown)

Got you again, you self-serving meglomaniac.

God damn, you fall for it every time, don't you you whackjob? Get a life Ray.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Of course. This is about Ray's delusions he's God

Re: Take it from a retired lawyer, (Mr. K's argument is utter nonsense.)

Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:09:19 GMT

From: Good news for the state of Oregon (unknown)

Of course the law doesn't bear him out. Problem is Ray really thinks he's God, and as such, no law pertains to him. It's high time he learned his true place in life, and answered for his abusive, irresponsible behavior in court. The $700 is likely only the beginning since I really think Ray is retarded and cannot learn anything the first several times around. Eventually either he'll learn he's simply another human being subject to laws all members of society are subject to, or his money will be taken from him until he flees the state like he did when he had these problems in California. Either way, this is a good thing for Oregon.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Why doesn't it occur to you

Re: The Awakening of Some, The Slumber of Others (Raymond Karczewski)

Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 22:57:13 GMT

From: Your only human relations are virtual (unknown)

that there is something deeply wrong with a man who has no relations with anyone expect in cyberspace. So here you are pontificating to some child who doesn't even begin to know you, or your history of family abuse, fraud, violence, and threats. Why do you think the only people who will have anything to do with you have never even laid eyes on you, and are obviously too young, sick, inexperienced, and/or unthinking as to strike up relations with a violent kook on the Internet. Have you ever thought why you are incapable of anything except virtual human relationships? Why do you think you are incapable of anything authentically human and real? Have you ever given this a moment's thought? Or is even that beyond what you can understand?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Not only wasn't the poster here talking to Ray

Re: This was not a response to Ray. (The poster is talking to Anne Morrow)

Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 17:40:38 GMT

From: He killed the thread off with thisscreed (unknown)

He killed the thread off with this screed. There were several people discussing latchkey kids among themselves, and Ray's vicious remarks here made everyone else move quickly on away from him. This isn't the only forum where Ray is considered a sick joke, and the funny thing is that place he's cross-posted this from is a kooky militia-style board. Even the lunatic-fringe paranoids will have nothing to do with him!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Again with the flag fringe?? It's DECORATION you ass

Re: Restoring Our Constitutional Government -- SOLUTIONS! (Raymond Karczewski)

Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 20:22:13 GMT

From: Paranoid a**hole (unknown)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

OOOOOO. Fringe. RUN EVERYBODY!! FRINGE!!

Re: Again with the flag fringe?? It's DECORATION you ass (Paranoid a**hole)

Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 21:30:24 GMT

From: Ray "I'm so scared of Fringe" Karczewski (unknown)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Millions are not threatening bloody revolution. Only you

Re: Restoring Our Constitutional Government -- SOLUTIONS! (Raymond Karczewski)

Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 20:25:38 GMT

From: And you're nothing but a forum kook (unknown)

Reply

Re: I'm still wondering about all this b**ching about lawyers (Your own daughter is an attorney)

Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 22:02:05 GMT

From: His abusive behavior was well known (unknown)

and my kids went to school with his kids. He treated them like hell, scared them so bad with violent physical and verbal behavior that one of them would hide at my house with my daughter, and they all ended up leaving for good in their teens. Anita did nothing to protect them, which was surprising to me because she started out as a reasonably responsible mother, but ended up Ray's accomplice in abusing the kids. They never came back after that. If he's looking for free legal representation after all his abuse, I imagine he's out of luck. It's called karma Ray.

rk: So you lived near me in Pacifica -- like Hell you did! However, oh cowardly anonymous one, you wouldn't think of affixing your true name to back up that libel, would you?

rk: I didn't think so!!.

rk: No matter. I think you'll find this issue of government/media sponsored/supported Anonymous Mind Control/Disinformation Agents who are employed to control the flow of information on these Internet newsgroups/forums through disruption, misdirection, libel, intimidation, and character assassination ISN'T OVER YET!!

rk: After I am finished with the Douglas County Sheriff's Office in this Constitutional matter of Rights vs. Privilege --YOU'RE NEXT!!

rk: The FBI is an organization driven by Politics. They respond to pressure by the public; that is, of course, only if the numbers are great enough. The STONE WALL of SILENCE they (the FBI) and various Congressmen/Senators have erected will only crumble when outraged citizens discover they've been had by those in whom they have placed their trust, find their backbones, and restore grassroots control over their government. When the public finally wakes up to how they have been controlled, deceived, and manipulated by their own government/media, the only writing you shall be doing in the future will be in Federal Prison. rk: However, the choice is up to the American People. They can take back control over their errant government NOW and remain citizens of a Sovereign Nation, or they can become fitted for their chains of slavery in servitude to the NEW WORLD ORDER.

rk: For the past six years on and off the Internet, I have done my part to wake up the American public. If you don't think it's been effective, ask yourself -- why is such a tremendous and sustained effort being expended to shut me down by those who hide in anonymity?

rk: WAKE UP, AMERICA!!

The following libelous attacks arise from the keyboards of assorted anonymous government/media disinformation agents who, through disruption, misdirection, intimidation, and character assassination control the flow of information on public UsenetNewsgroups/Forums

unk: This is 100% true Ray and you know it

Re: I Lived Near Ray in Pacifica... (Raymond Karczewski)

Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 10:32:00 GMT

From: Thr Truth is hell, isn't it??????? (unknown)

unk: You may try and you like to rewrite history, but we still remember the truth of what you did to your children. You were vicious Ray, absolute vicious, and no amount of bluster or threat will change your history of child abuse and malice. Attack me any further man and you have a real problem on your hands, you malignant child abuser. If you think your reputation is s**t now, people know NOTHING about what real filth you and Anita are. NOTHING. Just try it Ray: and try producing your own kids to back up what you say! If you can find them and make them even speak to you and Anita again that is. THE TRUTH IS HELL, ISN'T IT????????

rk: What I DO NOTE is that you are still too cowardly to back up your libelous statements with your TRUE NAME.

rk: Exactly what is it that you mean when you say "we still remember the truth of what you did to your children"? Be specific. Such vicious libels only mark you as the "hired gun" government/media sponsored/supported Disinformation Agent you are.

rk: Another thing, just where and when was it exactly that I attacked you?

rk: Certainly it is no attack to say that when this matter is brought to closure, you and your cohorts will be doing your writing from your Federal prison cells.

rk: Yes, indeed, THE TRUTH DOES RAISE HELL, DOESN'T IT?

Reply

Raymond Karczewski (arkent@arkenterprises.com) wrote:

You have heard the axiom, "Those who make the rules win the game." Can one expect justice in America's Judicial System? Let us put it to the test, shall we? Let us see if America's present day Court System is bound by the U.S. Constitution, or whether there is one law for those who come before the bench and another law for those who sit on the bench.

Much material has already been submitted to the Canyonville Justice Court and may be read on the following links:

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch25.htm#Horse

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch23.htm#Highwaymen

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch24.htm#FBI

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch24.htm#CONFISCATION

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch24.htm#Oregon

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch25.htm#Privileges

http://www.arkenterprises.com/dialch25.htm#Dismiss

The following is my final communication with Justice of the Peace Carol Roberts.

One may ask why I have chosen to publicly expose that which is normally confined to the highly controlled atmosphere of a Courtroom.

If justice cannot be found there (at this time, I am thoroughly convinced that it cannot), then perhaps justice and the restoration of our US Constitution in the courtrooms of America may best be served by sharing the experiences of one man standing up for his Unalienable Right and risking that such behavior be declared a crime.

I rest my case!!

Judge Carol Roberts

Justice of the Peace

Justice Court

209 N. Main

Canyonville OR 97417

Madam,

When I stopped at your office on June 18th, 2001, to secure information on Douglas County Court protocol to follow in the preparation of a "Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction," you stated during our brief, informal conversation in the outer receptionist's office that your "normal" course of action would be to read the motion, enter a default guilty plea, and reschedule the matter for a jury trial in another court. Your course of action appeared to be already determined even before testimony was heard in the matter.

I have already stated my position clearly at the scheduled hearing on the citation, June 27th 2001.

I appeared, as summoned, and was prepared to proceed in the matter on June 27th, 2001, the date and time affixed on the citation by Douglas County Sheriff's Deputy Poe, # 112.

Deputy Poe, the arresting officer, was not present. The motion was summarily denied. My experience in court matters, gleaned through my career as a Police Sergeant in a California Police Department, called for a dismissal under such circumstances.

I have made two trips to Roseburg and Canyonville, Oregon from my home in Cave Junction, Oregon in response to this issue, a clear violation of my Unalienable and Constitutional Rights. Along with the inconvenience, loss of time, and expenses for the approximately 420 miles travelled to resolve this issue of jurisdiction, the court now requires another trip which incurs further hardship and expense.

The court's position has changed in that the case was not heard at the date and time I was originally summoned to appear. The matter was not, as you have stated on the 18th of June, being rescheduled out of your court of *no record* into a court *of record* and jury trial; but instead, I am now being required to return to your court for a hearing without a jury.

My Unalienable Right to Liberty and my Constitutional Rights according to the 4th, 5th, and 14th Amendments have already been violated by Deputy Poe and your court.

"The right to travel is part of the Liberty of which a citizen cannot deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. This Right was emerging as early as the Magna Carta." Kent vs. Dulles, 357 US 116 (1958).

The focal point of this question of police power and due process must balance upon the point of making the public highways a safe place for the public to travel. If a man travels in a manner that creates actual damage, an action would lie (civilly) for recovery of damages. The state could then also proceed against the individual to deprive him of his Right to use the public highways, for cause. This process would fulfill the due process requirements of the Fifth Amendment while at the same time insuring that Rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and the state constitutions would be protected.

But unless or until harm or damage (a crime) is committed, there is no cause for interference in the private affairs or actions of a Citizen.

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.

There was no one else on the road to signal to. Hence no harm, damage or infringment upon another's rights in the use of the roadway was committed in my travel.

Deputy Poe violated my Unalienable and Constitutional Rights by stopping me in my travel in my private automobile. In addition, Deputy Poe's unlawful action of stopping me without having probable cause for doing so places all evidence gathered subsequent to the stop subject to the exclusionary rule as per the Miranda Rule vs. Arizona.

Case law states that "The courts are not bound by mere form, nor are they to be misled by PRETENSES. They are at liberty--indeed are under a SOLEMN DUTY--to look at the substance of things whenever they enter upon the inquiry whether the legislature has transcended the limit of it's authority. If therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect... the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, OR IS A PALPABLE INVASION OF RIGHTS SECURED BY THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW, it is the DUTY of the courts to so adjudge, and thereby give effect to the Constitution." (emph. added)MUGLER v KANSAS, 123, US 623, 661.

and;

Although the Fourteenth Amendment does not interfere with the proper exercise of the police power, in accordance with the general principle that the power must be exercised so as not to invade UNREASONABLY the rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, and the inhibitions there imposed. SOUTHERN R. CO. v VIRGINIA, 290 US 190. Moreover, the ultimate test of the propriety of police regulations must be found in the Fourteenth Amendment, since it operates to limit the field of police power to the extent of PREVENTING THE ENFORCEMENT OF STATUTES IN DENIAL OF RIGHTS that the Amendment protects. PARKS v STATE, 64 NE 862.

and;

With particular regard to the U.S. Constitution, it is elementary that a RIGHT secured by or protected by that document CANNOT BE OVERTHROWN OR IMPAIRED by any state police authority. CONNOLLY v UNION SEWER PIPE CO., 184 US 540, 22 S.Ct.431; LEFARIER v GRAND TRUNK R. CO., 24 A. 848, 17 LRA 111; O'NIEL v PROVIDENCE AMUSEMENT CO., 108 A. 887, 8 ALR 1590. The police power of the state must be exercised IN SUBORDINATION to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution. PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPELINE CO. v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, 294 US 613, 79 L.Ed 1090, 55 S.Ct. 563; BUCHANAN V WARLEY, 245 US 60, 62 L.Ed 149, 38 S.Ct.16.

and;

Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any state or territory, subjects or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. (Civil Rights) 42 U.S.C. 1963.

and;

"IT IS THE DUTY OF THE COURTS TO BE WATCHFUL FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE CITIZENS, AND AGAINST ANY STEALTHY ENCROACHMENTS THEREON." (emph. added) BOYD v US, 116 US 616 (1886).

At the time of my scheduled hearing, I challenged the court's jurisdiction in this matter citing the case HAGENS vs LAVINE, 15 U.S. 533m N-3 which states "Once jurisdiction is challenged, it must be proven."

The court offered no proof of jurisdiction in the instant case other than the statement that you "believed" you had jurisdiction in the matter. I noted an exception to your ruling.

When a judge exceeds his jurisdiction and grants or denies that beyond his lawful authority to grant or deny, he has perpetrated a "non-judicial" action. (Civil Rights) Yates v. Hoffman Estates (1962, DC Ill.) 209 F. Supp. 757

The US Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid: one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:

The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no powers or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it...

"A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supercede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superceded thereby.

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. Sixteenth American Jurisprudence Second Edition, Section 177

Admiralty-Maritime courts have jurisdiction over contracts, torts, and other special cases. Waring v. Clark, 5 HOW 441m 454-464: Genesse Chief v. Fitzhugh, 12 HOW. 443. 454, United States v Flores, 289 U.S. 137, 154. (1933)

Since your court gains its authority and finds its purpose in the adjudication of Admiralty-Maritime law

and;

since no contract existed between myself and the State of Oregon which would cause me to waive my Unalienable and Constitutional Rights and accept in its stead, the privilege of State Licensing,

and;

Unalienable Rights are inarguable. These God-given rights cannot be abridged, infringed upon, surrendered, transferred, converted, or legislated out of existence; nor can they be converted into privilege.

and;

this court has failed to prove its jurisdiction when challenged,

and;

This court has deprived me of my Constitutional Right to a trial by jury and violated the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.

One of the most famous and perhaps the most quoted definitions of due process of law, is that of Daniel Webster in his Dartmouth College Case (4 Wheat 518), in which he declared that by due process is meant "a law which hears before it condemns, which proceeds upon inquiry, and renders judgment only after trial." (See also State vs. Strasburg, 110 P. 1020; Dennis vs. Moses, 52 P. 333.)

I assert therefore that lacking proof of jurisidiction, the rulings of this court are in violation of the U.S. Constitution. As such, actions taken by this court have no force of law and impose no duty upon a citizen to accede to its ruling.

The court has ample case law contained in the motions submitted to bring closure to this matter.

Reply

The Few are able to rule the many only through the medium of Mind Control. Mind control is Satanic in origin.

Through force, fear, threat, and the ability to engender self-doubt in the minds of the many, the few continue to rule over the many with impunity.

Has anyone seriously delved deeply into the insanity of civilized life on this earth? Has anybody asked the question of themselves (for only in themselves do the answers exist) of how and why civilized men throughout the ages have been so easily controllable by their leaders?

It's all done through the medium of self-doubt, is it not? Through pressure, physical or psychological, consciousness is reduced/seduced from its infinite state of awareness -- an holistic energy which resonates with the unmistakable, nondualistic energy of Truth -- and is transmuted into a conflicted, fragmented, pseudo-reality ruled by dualistic thought.

At its fundamental base of existence, dualistic thought is partial, fragmented, broken down into warring opposites.

SATAN (the OPPOSER) is the very essence of Intellectualism. SATAN is merely a symbol, a word which reflects the breakdown of the whole into the fragmented essence of the partial. A distinct vibratory shift of consciousness occurs, creating the illusion in which the partial is deluded into believing it is the whole.

That is how man can be deluded into thinking that "he," the petty self, can be "a god in his own right." In that subtle but monumental shift of consciousness, an intellect based in words and symbols creates a reflective image of the undefinable perceived Truth and identifies with that partial reflection thereby mistaking it for the whole; i.e., GOD, the essence it seeks to reflect.

Create an illusory, dualistic thought-based reality, mistake it for the nondualistic energy of Truth (the whole), identify with it -- believe it to be the whole -- and you have just replicated the insanity of the world occupied by civilized men.

This is the devolution of man's consciousness, his "Fall from Grace." It is the Satanic seduction which eternally promises man that "he can be a god in his own right," but instead brings only misery and suffering to the ignorant and the unaware by creating contradiction in the instrument of a dualistic intellect. It is the Intellect which stimulates reactions of doubt, confusion, and violence.

Create a doubt in the mind of another, reinforce that doubt until it becomes habitual and damn near any man can be transformed from a Sovereign Citizen into an obedient, dutiful Slave. That is the nature of mind control. Its origin is found at the fragmented, dualistic Intellectual level of "right and wrong," "good and evil," "my belief vs. your belief," "my God vs your god," and ultimately "YOU and ME."

Now that a Sovereign human being has lost his balance, his integrity, his wholeness, a system of control is necessary to manage the emergence of neverending "unsolvable problems."

Enter MAN'S LAW: the Legal Profession!

Just what has the legal system with its lawyers, judges, and politicians brought mankind with its intellectual solutions based in laws, rules, and regulations designed to adjudicate and manage these "unsolvable problems"? Wars? Exploitation? Redistribution of Wealth? Endless divisions? -- YOU BET!!

How does such power emerge?

First one sells their Sovereignty as a human being for the promise of wealth, power and prestige. Their first step is to strike a bargain with the *Devil*; i.e., their own SATANICALLY ruled intellect, an instrument *absolutely* necessary for use in technical problem solving and communication with other intellects, but *absolutely* destructive when used for *nontechnical* problem solving. One must relinquish their wholeness (humanity) in return for the *dangled* earthly rewards of power, status, wealth, and prestige.

It is all done with words. The flawed medium of language is codified in *legal jargon* known only to an inner circle of Satanic manipulators. That is the first step to power. Create a system of thought which has one meaning to the initiated, and quite another to the uninitiated.

Declare the uninitiated as incompetent. Thus is created the status of *expert.* Require that one of their own *inner circle initiated* represent the dependent and unaware *uninitiated* ignorant in the Machiavellian ways used by wordtwisting, manipulative, mind controlling legal minds and the exploitation may then begin.

By ruling that the "uninitated" are incompetent to penetrate, to fathom the mysteries of Law, lawyers can then safely begin the process of Redistribution of Wealth; i.e., of exploiting the "uninitiated" by syphoning off their accumulated energy symbolized by the medium of money.

From there on, the lines of power are drawn. The boundaries have been established, The divisions have been created. The relationship of the "Haves and the Have nots" is now a pseudo-reality which may be exploited as often as is necessary, or until the mind control subject awakens from his hypnotic trance state and reclaims his lost awareness.

The solution which threatens such SATANIC legal/political system responsible for creating and sustaining this mind controlled Hell on Earth is quite simple.

It is a secret hidden in plain sight. Few are sensitive enough to recognize it when they see it, for they are "normally" subject to the influences of the incessant misdirections of their mind control handlers. As such, they are habitually looking for it in the wrong place.

Break the momentum of reinforced conditioning. Be silent. Allow the Intellect to come to an end, to die. Then just OBSERVE.

In that fleeting moment one may experience the nondualistic essence of TRUTH. Pay attention to its distinct and unmistakable vibration. Don't interpret it through dualistic thought. Let the Truth NOW manifesting in consciousness guide you in your every word and action. In that moment of surrender, the Resurrection of the Infinite Spirit of Truth manifests in one's consciousness.

Let the Spirit of Infinite Intelligence guide you in all *nontechnical* matters of life.

Break the *habit* of *habitual living.* Live in the moment. Be atone with Truth. You will become sensitive to the subtle changes of vibration revealing itself to your consciousness. Let the Spirit of Truth be your guide.

In that moment and every moment hence, do not lie, cheat, steal, exploit, or *initiate* harm to another -- THEN SCREW THE RULES!! Do that, and you will find that you are atone with God's Law, not merely blindly conforming to the fiction of man's law.

Do that, and our present world will change in an *eternal blink of an eye. *

Do that and the elitist few -- the lawyers, judges, politicians, bankers, the corporate leaders who make up the "HAVES" in an unbalance world of HAVES and HAVE NOTS -- shall come to understand the true meaning of the "equality of man."

Reply

Sat, 07 Jul 2001 18:09:27 -0100

pumpkin@freedom.net wrote:

Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com

Ray:

p: Nicely written--you just covered all this worlds problems, its cause and its solution.

Raymond Karczewski wrote:

Man's Law: Satanic in Origin

p: Yes! but not for much longer, due to the work that you and others have done in showing us the nature of the real enemy- soon we will come together and fight the forces of evil.

rk: > Through force, fear, threat, and the ability to engender self-doubt in the minds of the many, the few continue to rule over the many with impunity.

p: No longer will I accept them as my master---it is us who will reshape this world. No longer will we, their slaves, continue to fight with each other- we need to understand it is not each other that is our enemy but they who have controlled us for so long.

rk: > Has anyone seriously delved deeply into the insanity of civilized life on this earth?

p: Yes we have been conditioned as a means to control and enslave us- first physical bondage and now mental enslavement.

rk: > Has anybody asked the question of themselves (for only in themselves do the answers exist) of how and why civilized men throughout the ages have been so easily controllable by their leaders?

p: They use our emotions to control and condition our behavior. They have taught us to hate one another--its called divide and conquer---they keep their stupid slaves (us) fighting among ourselves so as not to see that we are being controlled by them. Ray- we do not except any man as our leader! We only follow a spirit of truth that guides us. But with mental awareness, comes a spirit of truth, which shows us the nature of all things.

rk: > Through pressure, physical or psychological, consciousness is reduced/seduced from its infinite state of awareness, an holistic energy which resonates with the unmistakable, nondualistic energy of Truth and is transmuted into a conflicted, fragmented, pseudo-reality ruled by dualistic thought. At its fundamental base of existence, dualistic thought is partial, fragmented, broken down into warring opposites.

p: Then simply never give in to pressure, always do what you feel in your heart is right. To give in to pressure is to relinquish our birthright of freedom.

rk: > SATAN, (the OPPOSER) is the very essence of Intellectualism. SATAN is merely a symbol, a word which reflects the breakdown of the whole into the fragmented essence of the partial. A distinct vibratory shift of consciousness occurs creating the illusion in which the partial is deluded into believing it is the whole.

p: Yes we always will have a master-----but we choice which one we will follow. The image of Satan or universal consciousness as demonstrated by Jesus and others like him.

rk: > That is how man can be deluded into thinking that "he" the petty self, can be a "god in his own right." In that subtle but monumental shift of consciousness, an intellect based in words and symbols creates a reflective image of the undefinable perceived Truth and identifies with that partial reflection thereby mistaking it for the whole, i.e., GOD, the essence it seeks to reflect.

rk: > Create an illusory, dualistic thought based reality, mistake it for the nondualistic energy of Truth (the whole), identify with it -- believe it to be the whole and you have just replicated the insanity of the world occupied by civilized men.

p: There is no civilization on this planet now nor has there ever been one--it is up to us to bring together those who want to design and start a system where everyone will live in a spirit of universal brotherhood where no one will think themselves better then another.

rk: > This is the devolution of man's consciousness, his "Fall from Grace." It is the Satanic seduction which eternally promises man that "he can be a god in his own right," but instead brings only misery and suffering to the ignorant and the unaware by creating contradiction in the instrument of a dualistic intellect. It is the Intellect which stimulates reactions of doubt, confusion, and violence.

rk: Create a doubt in the mind of another, reinforce that doubt until it become habitual, and damn near any man can be transformed from a Sovereign Citizen into an obediant, dutiful Slave. That is the nature of mind control. Its origin is found at the fragmented dualistic Intellectual level of "right and wrong," "good and evil." "my belief vs. your belief," "my God vs your god," and ultimately "YOU and ME."

rk: > Now that a Sovereign human being has lost his balance, his integrity, his wholeness, a system of control is necessary to manage the emergence of neverending "unsolvable problems."

rk: > Enter MAN'S LAW: the Legal Profession!

p: There is only one law-that which leads to freedom--all others are there to confine and enslave us.

rk: > Just what has the legal system with its lawyers, judges, and politicians brought mankind with its intellectual solutions based in laws, rules and regulations designed to adjudicate andmanage these "unsolvable problems"? Wars? Exploitation? Redistribution of Wealth? Endless divisions? -----YOU BET!!

rk: > How does such power emerge?

p: We fight only for our own rights, but never for the rights of others. When we finally come to see that injustice anywhere or done to anyone is not to be tolerated. When the human race stops fighting only for economic interests and begins fighting for the freedom and rights of others will planetary peace finally materialize.

rk: > First one sells their Sovereignty as a human being for the promise of wealth, power and prestige. Their first step is to strike a bargain with the *Devil* i.e., their own SATANICALLY ruled intellect, an instrument *absolutely* necessary for use in technical problem solving and communication with other intellects, but *absolutely* destructive when used for *nontechnical* problem solving. One must relinquish their wholeness (humanity) in return for the *dangled* earthly rewards of power, status, wealth, and prestige.

rk: > It is all done with words. The flawed medium of language is codified in *legal jargon* known only to an inner circle of Satanic manipulators. That is the first step to power. Create a system of thought which has one meaning to the initiated, and quite another to the uninitiated.

rk: > Declare the uninitiated as incompetent. Thus is created the status of *expert.* Require that one of their own *inner circled initiated* represent the dependant and unaware *uninitiated* ignorant in the Machiavellian ways used by wordtwisting, manipulative, mind controlling legal minds, and the exploitation may then begin.

rk: > By ruling that the "uninitated" are incompetent to penetrate, to fathom the mysteries of Law, lawyers can then safely begin the process of Redistribution of Wealth, i.e., of exploiting the "uninitiated" by syphoning off their accumulated energy symbolized by the medium of money.

rk: > From there on, the lines of power are drawn. The boundaries have been established, The divisions have been created. The relationship of the "Haves and the Have nots" is now a pseudo-reality which may be exploited as often as is necessary, or, until the mind control subject awakens from his hypnotic trance state and reclaims his lost awareness.

rk: > The solution which threatens such SATANIC legal/political system responsible for creating and sustaining this mind controlled Hell on Earth is quite simple.

rk: > It is a secret hidden in plain sight. Few are sensitive enough to recognize it when they see it, for they are "normally"subject to the influences of the incessant misdirections of their mind control handlers. As such, they are habitually looking for it in the wrong place.

rk: > Break the momentum of reinforced conditioning. Be silent. Allow the Intellect to come to an end, to die. Then just OBSERVE.

p: Here a great man speaks truth---and he offers to us the key to the kingdom-- He beacons to us to follow him- to come out of our minds and their delusions and enter into the world of experience (reality) where beauty and joy is to be found.

rk: > In that fleeting moment, one may experience the nondualistic essence of TRUTH. Pay attention to its distinct and unmistakable vibration. Don't interpret it through dualistic thought. Let the Truth NOW manifesting in consciousness guide you in your every word and action. In that moment of surrender the Resurrection of the Infinite Spirit of Truth manifests in one's consciousness.

rk: > Let the Spirit of Infinite Intelligence guide you in all *nontechnical* matters of life.

p: Albert Einstein said that god reveals himself to us thru the world of experience.

rk: > Break the *habit* of *habitual living.* Live in the moment. Be atone with Truth. You will become sensitive to the subtle changes of vibration revealing itself to your consciousness. Let the Spirit of Truth be your guide.

p: We can never be the truth, but it can express itself thru us if only we will let it.

rk: > In that moment and every moment hence, do not lie, cheat, steal, exploit, or *initiate* harm to another ---- THEN SCREW THE RULES!! Do that, and your will find that you are atone with God's Law, not merely blindly conforming to the fiction of man's law. Do that, and our present world will change in an *eternal blink of an eye. *

p: If enough people would listen to this advise this worlds system of exploitation and corruption would come crashing down.

rk: > Do that and the elitist few, the lawyers, judges, politicians, bankers, the corporate leaders who make up the "HAVES" in an unbalance world of HAVES and HAVE NOTS, shall come to understand the true meaning of the "equality of man,"

p: The universal law is quite clear on this point, no one is superior to another and all humans are born with the equal right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness---- We were all born with a birthright of freedom, which has been deigned; to all of us, and it is time that we demanded and took our birthright back.

Reply

Next Page

Return to Home Page