NOTE: Since I have been routinely obstructed by the court
from speaking in my defense in my last seven appearances in this case now
before the State of Oregon Circuit Court for Josephine County, I have decided
to post the contents of this address publicly on the Internet prior to
the hearing. Only with full disclosure of facts which otherwise would
be narrowly controlled by the court, may a slumbering populace awaken to
the power of
Truth, which no Judicial body acting beyond the scope of the United
States of America Constitution, may stifle.
Sir,
The name of the defendant listed on the complaint is not this living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person who is speaking to you. The name on the complaint, spelled in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS, is my private property, my common-law-copyrighted trade-name/trademark.
I am the Secured Party and holder of that common-law-copyrighted property.
I AM NOT THAT JURISTIC PERSON, that legal fiction. Yet this court and the Josephine County Sheriff's Department has seen fit to arrest, imprison and hold me hostage for 341/2 days in the Josephine County Jail for "crimes" they allege were committed by the Defendant.
The unauthorized use of that copyrighted trade-name/trademark continues to carry with it a fee of $500,000.00 each and every time its unauthorized use is recorded in these proceedings. For purposes of this hearing, you may address me as SECURED PARTY.
I, this private, living, breathing, flesh-and-blood natural person DO NOT CONSENT TO DOING BUSINESS WITH THIS COURT.
From my first appearance on September 12th, 2002, to my seventh appearance on October 15th, 2002, I have repeatedly, specifically and unequivocally asserted that I DID NOT CONSENT TO DOING BUSINESS WITH THIS COURT.
Nothing has changed. I reserve all of my Rights at all times, and waive none of my Rights at any time. My appearance here today, as in the other appearances, is special. I am not here voluntarily. I am appearing here against my will.
The agreement made with the court on Oct 15th for my return to the court on this date, Nov. 12th, 2002, can be seen by any reasonable men as an unconscionable contract.
It was imposed upon me by you, sir (Judge Coon),
in an atmosphere of extreme duress. My physical condition on that
day was markedly affected by my 33-day hunger strike in protest over my
false arrest and lengthy imprisonment by the Josephine County Courts and
Sheriff's Department. I was given neither time nor means to prepare
for a Jury Trial scheduled by you, sir (Judge COON), for that date,
October 15, 2002, after only a one-
day notice.
The agreement made for a postponement could well be likened to a "kidnap victim" or a hostage being told by his captors that he would be released from their *unlawful custody* if only he promises to "voluntarily" return and place himself back into their *unlawful custody* at a future date and time.
No reasonable person would accept such unconscionable terms as a "voluntary agreement" and therefore constitute a valid contract. As such, the unconscionable contract foisted upon me on Oct. 15, 2002, by you, sir (Judge Coon), has no force of law behind it and is NULL AND VOID.
At that appearance I asked for the postponement in order to look at my options in seeking counsel. I had not, at any time, engaged, ratified or accepted Mr. Peter Smith of the Josephine County Public Defenders Office to represent me and act as my attorney in these matters. Mr. Smith was appointed to represent me against my will and my wishes by you, sir (Judge Coon). Mr.Smith will attest to that fact. Mr Smith added that since he was appointed by you to represent me in this case, so must he be discharged by you. Let it be so.
I have since learned that no ATTORNEY can represent this living, breathing, flesh-and-blood natural person in his private capacity in any action brought before the court. Since that is the very core of the issue -- that of a sovereign who refuses to waive his Rights by accepting the services of an attorney which would diminish his capacity to represent himself -- I have therefore ruled out the option of securing legal counsel to represent me.
On seven prior occasions I was brought to face this court against my will. I have repeatedly challenged the court publicly to prove its jurisdiction *in writing* over this private, living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, natural person. The court has repeatedly evaded the issue and refused to follow the law. The law states that, when jurisdiction is challenged, all proceedings must come to a halt until the court is able to prove jurisdiction.
On Friday, Nov. 8, 2002, I presented District Attorney CLAY E. JOHNSON with the document "CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE -- REQUEST FOR PROOF OF CLAIM." I did so in an effort to expedite the administration of justice and bring closure to this matter.
Neither District Attorney CLAY E. JOHNSON nor his Deputy NEIL C. MOREY, acting in their private capacity, have as yet responded to the issues enumerated as "Proof of Claims" over this private, living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, natural person.
If Deputy District Attorney NEIL C. MOREY is prepared to address these Proof of Claims issues at this time, this matter before the court may be resolved here and now.
If Deputy District Attorney NEIL C. MOREY, in his private capacity as claimant, is not prepared to respond to the PROOF OF CLAIMS as enumerated, and/or establish clear jurisdiction over this PRIVATE, living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person, then I ask this court for a week's continuance to afford Mr. MOREY the opportunity to establish such proof of claims/jurisdiction.
If no such proof of claims can be established within the 10-day period extended District Attorney CLAY E. JOHNSON, Deputy District Attorney NEIL C. MOREY, and/or other members of his staff who have been involved in the prosecution of this case, the prosecution will be found in dishonor and will have admitted damage and injury to this living, breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient, natural person, this private man.
Without the Prosecutor's establishment of such Proof
of Claims, this case must be dismissed.
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Common Law Copyright Autograph