IN THE CIRCUIT COURT STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF JOSEPHINE
RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI© AFFIDAVIT / JUDICIAL
NOTICE
An Ens Legis
Defendant, BY
VISITATION REGARDING NOTICE OF
Vs.
DEFAULT
STATE OF OREGON
Josephine County corporation by
CLAY E. JOHNSON, Prosecutor
Plaintiff,
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Secured Party/Creditor
CASE NO. 02-CR-0617
3rd party Intervenor.
COMES NOW Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, the third party
intervenor as secured
party and authorized representative of the above debtor, RAYMOND
RONALD
KARCZEWSKI©, an ens legis, herein notices this Court of facts
known and unknown, to
wit:
1. THAT, third party intervenor accepted for value
the offer presented by DISTRICT
ATTORNEY CLAY E. JOHNSON and counter-offer was made upon agreement
to
perform to the original offer, pay said fine or go to jail, predicated
upon ‘proof of claim’
as presented to the prosecutor CLAY E. JOHNSON.
2. THAT, third party intervenor caused to be sent a private Conditional
Acceptance for
Value for Proof of Claim U.S.P.O Registered Mail Article No RR463804155
US on 21st
day of January, 2003, wherein the Plaintiff/Prosecutor was given
10 days to produce or
bring forward under good faith the requested Proof of
Claim. (attached hereto and
made a part hereof)
3. THAT, third party intervenor was required to take default
as against the
Plaintiff/Prosecutor by Affidavit of Notice of Default. (attached
hereto and made a part
hereof)
4. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM
on how the Oregon
Constitution operates upon me, Raymond Ronald Karczewski©,
a living breathing, flesh-and-
blood, sentient, natural person, the private man.
5. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM
on how the State statutes by
and through the Oregon Legislature and the DMV operate upon me,
Raymond Ronald
Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient,
natural person, the private man.
6. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM
that the name appearing on
the charging instrument, in capital letters; RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI,
is not a
corporate fiction, but is the name of the living, breathing, flesh-and-blood,
sentient, natural
person, the private man in his private capacity.
7. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM
that the Oregon Revised
Statutes (ORS) describe any other class of license other than for
commerce or for commercial
trade, occupation or profession.
Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition Article 1, Section 1
8. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM
that this private man is
specifically named in the Oregon State Statutes and more specifically
ORS cites as
applied in this matter. (See the PEOPLE v. HERKIMER, 15 Am
Dec 379, 4 Cowen
(N.Y. 345, 348 (1825)
Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition Article 1, Section 1
9. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF
CLAIM that the STATE OF
OREGON, in its Corporate capacity, has Jurisdiction over this living,
breathing, flesh-and-blood,
sentient, natural person/private man, the Secured Party, Raymond
Ronald Karczewski© in his
private capacity unless consented to, and/or contracted for, by
that natural person/private man.
Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition Article 1, Section 1
10. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM
that the COUNTY OF
JOSEPHINE, in its Corporate capacity, has Jurisdiction over this
living, breathing, flesh-and-
blood, sentient, natural person/private man, the Secured Party,
Raymond Ronald Karczewski© in
his private capacity unless consented to, and/or contracted for,
by that natural person/private man.
Constitution of Oregon -- ARTICLE XV MISCELLANEOUS
3. Oaths of office
11. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF
CLAIM that all "Officers of the
Court," which include members of the JOSEPHINE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S
staff,
are under oath of office to support and defend both U.S. and OREGON
Constitutions.
Constitution of Oregon -- ARTICLE XV MISCELLANEOUS
3. Oaths of office
12. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF
CLAIM that Deputies and/or Jail
Staff, in their capacity as Agents for the CORPORATE JOSEPHINE
COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT, are bound by their oath of office to support and defend,
both U.S. and
OREGON Constitutions
Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition Article 1, Section 1
13. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF
CLAIM that the CIRCUIT
COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR JOSEPHINE COUNTY, in its
Corporate
capacity, has Jurisdiction over this living, breathing, flesh-and-blood,
sentient, natural
person/private man, the Secured Party, Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
in his private capacity
unless consented to, and/or contracted for, by that natural person/private
man.
Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition Article 1, Section 1
14. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF
CLAIM of the existence of the
liability and how it was created.
Constitution of Oregon – 2001 Edition Article 1, Section 1
15. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF
CLAIM of what 'state' the liability
came from, the de jure state ('The State') or the de-facto state
('This State'), a mere corporation.
16. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF
CLAIM that the State of Oregon
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DMV, through its Administrative Drivers
Licensing
process, has Jurisdiction over this living, breathing, flesh-and-blood,
sentient, natural
person/private man, the Secured Party, Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
in his private capacity
unless consented to, and/or contracted for, by that natural person/private
man.
17. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM
that in my private
capacity, that I, Raymond Ronald Karczewski©, a living breathing,
flesh-and-blood, sentient,
natural person, the private man is subject to Class A, B, and C
commercial driver license. (see
ORS 807.031)
18. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM that
the State of Oregon
via the DMV sells any other ‘driver’ license.
19. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM
that the Motor Vehicle
code does not operate upon all ‘drivers’ of ‘all’ vehicles owned
or operated by ‘the United
States,’ ‘this state,’ ‘or any county,’ ‘city,’ ‘district,’ ‘or
any other political subdivision of this
state’ … and thus operates upon this private man. (see ORS 801.020)
20. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM
that my ‘private vehicle is
not a ‘recreational’ vehicle that is operated solely for personal
(private) use. (see ORS 801.208)
21. PROOF OF CLAIM that my ‘private vehicle is used for the
transportation of persons for
compensation or profit, or designed or used primarily for the transportation
of property (for hire).
(see ORS 801.210)
22. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM that
Raymond Ronald
Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient,
natural person, the private man was a
licensee at the time of the ‘stop’ to subject himself to the motor
vehicle code by agreement and as
a signatory. (see Vehicle Traffic Law, 1974 Rev Ed., page 238, 239)
23. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM that,
“In view of this rule a
statutory provision that the supervision officials “may” exempt
such persons when the
transportation is not on a commercial basis means that they “must”
exempt them, generally
applies in this matter (State v. Johnson, 243 P. 1073; 60 C.J.S.
section 94 pg 581)
24. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM that
Raymond Ronald
Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient,
natural person, the private man does
not have the right in light of ORS 801.305.
25. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM that
the ‘entity’ bringing
forth this claim can testify on the witness- stand of the same and
bring all relevant evidence.
26. THAT, Plaintiff was asked to bring forth PROOF OF CLAIM that
the prosecutor, as an
agent of the State, has established a ‘liability bond’ in this action
to indemnify Raymond Ronald
Karczewski©, a living breathing, flesh-and-blood, sentient,
natural person, the private man in the
event of any damnification.
Plaintiff CLAY E. JOHNSON was asked to bring forth FULL DISCLOSURE
as to all facts and
matters as to this complaint.
The Plaintiff and the Court and all its officers are bound
to the restriction of Article I,
Section X of the U.S. Constitution as it operates by and through
their ‘Oath’ of Office.
The Plaintiff/Prosecutor has privately failed and or refused to produce/provide
‘Proof of
Claim’ as requested with the time period stated.
The Plaintiff/Prosecutor has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
The Plaintiff/Prosecutor has stipulated to the facts, as they operate
in favor of the Third
Party Intervenor
The Plaintiff/Prosecutor has stipulated by his failure or refusal
that the
Plaintiff/prosecutor in ‘his’ private or public capacity has no
claim or controversy and
therefore there is nothing for the court in its ministerial capacity
to adjudicate.
This AFFIDAVIT JUDICIAL NOTICE BY SPECIAL VISITATION
REGARDING NOTICE OF
DEFAULT is dated: the Twentieth Day of the Second Month in the Year
of Our Lord Two
Thousand Three.
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
___________________________________
Secured Party/Creditor
Autograph Common Law Copyright ª 2002 by Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
All rights reserved. NO part of this Autograph Common Law Copyright
may be used, nor may said copyrighted property be reproduced in any manner,
without prior, express, written consent and acknowledgment of Raymond Ronald
Karczewski© as signified by Raymond Ronald Karczewski©'s signature
in red ink. Unauthorized use of "Raymond Ronald Karczewski" incurs
same unauthorized-use fees as those associated with RAYMOND RONALD KARCZEWSKI©.
Mail recipient and address for return correspondence:
Debra C. Buchanan, Notary Public
Post Office Box
Cave Junction, OR 97523
Affidavit and Notice
The undersigned affiant, solemnly states and declares:
That, any and all contracts, agreements, covenants, corporate
franchises, (XIVth
Amendment) franchises, hypothecations, promises, pledges, choses
in action, cessio
bonorum, bailment, transfers, use, cestui que use, cestui que trust,
trusts and
confidences (or presumptions emanating therefrom) and/or similar
transactions by and
between the undersigned affiant and the UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES
OF
AMERICA, STATE OF OREGON and any and all subdivisions thereof, including
its or
their representatives, are cancelled due to "non-disclosure" and
"failure of fair
consideration."
See: Article I, Section 10, Constitution for the United
States of America.
Any alleged (ens legis) privileges and/or benefits are rejected
and waived.
Effective Date: Common Era, September 23, 1937
Party Aggrieved; Without Recourse,
_______________________________
Raymond Ronald Karczewski©
Affiant-sui juris
In care of: P. O Box
1870, near
(97523) Cave Junction
Oregon
The United States
of America.
Attached Exhibits:
Exhibit 1: Copy: CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE -- REQUEST FOR
PROOF OF CLAIM,:
CASE NO. 02-CR- 0617, Dated January 20, 2003, sent U.S.P.O Registered
Mail Article No
RR463804155 US to DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLAY E. JOHNSON:
Exhibit 2: Copy: AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING, and Signed
Receipt U.S.P.O Registered Mail
Article No RR463804155 US, received and dated Jan 22, 2003 by "G
JOHNSON," agent for
JOSEPHINE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLAY E. JOHNSON.
Exhibit 3: Copy: CERTIFICATION OF NON-RESPONSE regarding CONDITIONAL
ACCEPTANCE -- REQUEST FOR PROOF OF CLAIM,: dated February 7, 2003,
signed by
DEBRA C. BUCHANAN, Notary Public.
Exhibit 4: Copy: AFFIDAVIT AND NOTICE OF DEFAULT, RRK
020703 CEJ, dated February 7, 2003, addressed to DISTRICT ATTORNEY
CLAY E. JOHNSON, sent U.S.P.O Registered
Mail Article No RR463804186 US
Exhibit 5: Copy: AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING, and Signed Receipt U.S.P.O
Registered Mail
Article No RR463804186 US received and dated Feb 10, 2003, by "G
JOHNSON," agent for
JOSEPHINE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY CLAY E. JOHNSON.
STATE OF OREGON
County of Josephine } ss.
BE IT REMEMBERED, That on this _______ day of ______________,
______,
Before me, the undersigned, A Notary Public in and for the State
of Oregon, personally
appeared the within named ______________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________
known to me to be the identical individual AS described
in and who executed the within
instrument and acknowledged to me that ___________ executed the
same freely
and voluntarily.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
My
hand And affixed my official seal the day
and Year last
above Written.
_________________________________________
Notary Public of Oregon
My Commission expires: _______________________